Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely (
More info?)
Be careful with 3-rd party GINA's and Remote Desktop... Some have
been known to be incompatible with RD...
Check to make sure that they support working over a Remote
Desktop/Terminal Services "session".
---
Jeffrey Randow (Windows Networking MVP)
jeffreyr-support@remotenetworktechnology.com
http://www.networkblog.net (My Networking Blog)
http://www.remotenetworktechnology.com (Support Site)
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 05:51:04 -0700, "cliffdi"
<cliffdi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Al, thanks again. Both solutions look pretty cool. Will experiment.
>
>For the hardware solution, I was thinking more along the lines of the
>Aladdin eToken. It's a USB dongle-type device that has to be physically
>present to log-in to Windows (with Aladdin's GINA installed). It's not
>completely secure though (mind you though, what is?)
>
>Cheers
>
>Cliff
>
>"Sooner Al [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Not by MAC address, but some firewalls permit rules to only allow certain IP
>> addresses access...
>>
>> Being a home user I can't speak to the issue of hardware based firewall
>> systems that may use private/public keys for authentication. Personally I
>> have used RDP through a SSH2 tunnel with a 2048-bit RSA private/public key
>> pair to access my home LAN. I am now experimenting with a free SSL-VPN
>> solution, which seems to be working very well...
>>
>>
http://3sp.com/showSslExplorer.do
>>
>>
http://theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/RemoteDesktop/SSH-RDP-VNC/RemoteDesktopVNCandSSH.html
>>
>> --
>>
>> Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking)
>>
>> Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual
>> benefit of all of us...
>> The MS-MVP Program -
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights...
>>
>>
>> "cliffdi" <cliffdi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:7B226F2D-37CE-4790-AF7C-2517BF910D38@microsoft.com...
>> >I have RDC working well now, but I'd like to lock down where it can be
>> > accessed from (e.g. by MAC address).
>> >
>> > Alternatively is anyone aware of a hardware solution that would provide
>> > stonger authentication using public/private key technology?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Cliff
>> >
>>
>>
>>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram