Well, I don't know what is the difference in those optical wire. I plan to run one from my computer sound card to my home theater receiver, and while some are cheap, other are pretty expensives.
What is the difference between the cheap one and the expensive ones?
I know that there must be quality, but how does that matter?
DAMN IT!!! I get paid to do this normally because i do this at work all day but here goes....
Buy a monster 400 optical one. They are roughtly 39.99 but they have a lifetime warranty so if the cable has any problems they will take care of it which is nice.
Bascially the difference is when the light is going through the wire you want the wire to be as clean and clear as possible. higher quality cables are more clear, so the light doesn't bend within the cable. honeslty its something i doubt you would notice with a cheap cable, but i still say go with the cheapest monster or cheapest god brand you can find.
No, I mean optical fiber wire for home theater. I need one to connect my sound card output to my receiver for dolby digital 5.1 sound. I don't have any coaxial connector left on my receiver.
So, do you think the cheapest one would do the same for a while if my computer is at 10 feet from my receiver? This will be the fartest the computer will be from the receiver.
Thats the bonus about optical....you can have it like 700ft from your reciever...the length almost desn't matter (over like a mile is starts to matter....i assume you will be closer then a mile...lol)
Also you dont have to worry about bending and createting sharp angles like you do with digital coax....you can run it in a tight spiral if you want....same quality.
Fibre Optical is my personal choice for all home seups over digital for those reasons above.
the 12ft fibre optical monster is like 49.99 at BestBuy i think.
i could look it up but i am lazy.
The black thing is actually a plug that..plug the hole for the fiber optic cable.
By the way, it is not that card that I have, but one that has the same thing. It use TOSLINK cable to send digital signal by optic fiber to the dolby receiver.
The black thing is actually a plug that..plug the hole for the fiber optic cable.
By the way, it is not that card that I have, but one that has the same thing. It use TOSLINK cable to send digital signal by optic fiber to the dolby receiver.
I'll be darn!
But isn't that overkill? I mean, do you really think that you could hear the difference between fiber optics and speaker wire?
I mean you could use a couple of phono Jack plugs and cheap wire . Would there be a noticeable difference?
Well, the use for that is not for music, but rather movies. This cable carry the signal to create the 5.1 dolby effect as seen in the cinema. With surround sound. You only have one cable that drives like 6 speakers, 1 left-rear, 1 right-rear, 1 front, 1 front-right, 1 front-left and the bass box. My PC is connected to my TVset and hometheater reciever, so I can wach movies, be it DVDs or Divx in their full sound effect when their are encoded with AC3. just like in theater.
Are you saying that he has a fiber optics out on his sound card????????????
COME ON
Yeah he said in his first post about it that he had a Fibre out on his SC....which i know a lot of cards now have....its no different then a card having a digital coax out. Same digital high quality....each has up's and down's but they are available.
And YES!! RCA jacks can only carry stereo sound....the fibre and D coax can carry a digital 5.1 signal. So would you notice between 5.1 and 2.1? I think you would.
Also its not optical TO the speakers....just the receiver. then you are using standard speaker wire to the speakers.
But now you know. So, if you ever get a new sound card and a home theater receiver, you'll know that you can connect them digitally to enjoy the best sound quality for your movies
The thought of optical didn't even enter my mind.
I was thinking about the pre made speaker wires with the gold plated plugs on them they sell to the gullible American consumer.
I used to use RG8 and RG58 ,coax all the time on my ham radio. I ran a thousand Watts on frequencies as high as 30 MHZ. We had VHS and UHF radios on much higher frequencies but we were not allowed to use that much power there. The higher the frequency the greater the risk for signal losses on Long runs of coax. Even at 220MHz gold plated connectors were not needed .
exactly digital coax quality depends on short wires......fibre optic wires dont have that problem and you can have sharp angles too...so wraping around a corner doesn't hurt anythig
Optical is used for tranfering digital sound between the source and the amplifier. It's major advantage over digital coaxial is that it can be run over longer distances.
LOL yeah the only way to get music onto my Minidisc player is via optical SPDIF.
my old Mobo used to have optical via an audio expansion bracket, it had 3 extra pin jacks a digital co-ax and an optical port.
my new mobo's (two of them that replaced my broken old one) don't have any optical. its a massive bummer.
AFAIK optical SPDIF was more common than coax in the early days of SPDIF. all the devices i ever saw with it were optical. i bought my MD about 5 years ago or more.
as for cables (to the original poster) darned if i would know, i have never had any issues and mine is the one that came with either the MD or the Mobo.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.