Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Now they are spying on you....

Now they are spying on you....

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - Now they are spying on you....

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 3 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

The Bush Administration has been secretly spying on you since 2002.

While many details about the program remain secret, officials familiar with it say the N.S.A. eavesdrops without warrants on up to 500 people in the United States at any given time. The list changes as some names are added and others dropped, so the number monitored in this country may have reached into the thousands since the program began, several officials said.

More Pentagon Spying

And I am watching a documentary on Hitler and his manuscript Mein Kampf and the second chapter.
How he admired the US for their techniques and methods of driving out the natives to near extinction and cordoning off in reservations which he believed them to be an inferior race. Totally thought provoking...

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Quote :

“Some people never learn,” he says. During the Vietnam War, Pyle blew the whistle on the Defense Department for monitoring and infiltrating anti-war and civil rights protests when he published an article in the Washington Monthly in January 1970.

The public was outraged and a lengthy congressional investigation followed that revealed that the military had conducted investigations on at least 100,000 American citizens. Pyle got more than 100 military agents to testify that they had been ordered to spy on U.S. citizens — many of them anti-war protestors and civil rights advocates. In the wake of the investigations, Pyle helped Congress write a law placing new limits on military spying inside the U.S.

But Pyle, now a professor at Mt. Holyoke College in Massachusetts, says some of the information in the database suggests the military may be dangerously close to repeating its past mistakes.

“The documents tell me that military intelligence is back conducting investigations and maintaining records on civilian political activity. The military made promises that it would not do this again,” he says.

Reply to RichPLS

Rich, sometimes you have to put things in perspective. What we have going on in the USA is nothing like they have in the UK. They have cameras EVERYWHERE! How do you think they got footage of the bus/tube bombers so fast?

It's risk vs reward rich.

Reply to dhlucke

eavesdropping with personal phone taps with no court order and public cameras are two separate directions.
It is abuse of power and protocol which will lead to abuse, if it already hasn't been abused. Given time, there is no limits to this invasion and no one will be safe.

Reply to RichPLS

I agree. This is something that was put over on us under a cloak of national security. Our rights were fought for and we should never submit to any of them being taken away. That would almost be like pissing on the ground at Arlington National Cemetery.

Reply to russell

time is ticking away along with our freedoms . . .

Reply to RichPLS

you're paranoid....the only one that's spying on you is me.....nice p.j.'s BTW.....

Reply to qoop

We are talking about a Person, who claims to do all this for our own good! This is the same Person, who told certain European Leaders that God told him to invade Iraq. When Sirhan- Sirhan killed Kenedy, He said the voices told him to do it. He got life in prison..A texan says it, he is elected to 2 terms as President. Go figure.

Reply to CHHunter

The only interceptions made where communications made overseas. I still don't understand why they didn't get permission from the secret court but I'm sure we'll find out.

Reply to dhlucke

So if you call your brother who is visiting in Afganganistan, you can expect they are listening?
What about to Paris?
Mexico?
Canada?
Brazile?

Reply to RichPLS

I might not have a problem with any of it if I knew what they were doing with the data they mine.

Reply to dhlucke

But you won't know till it is too late!

Reply to RichPLS

They allow the same CIA to spy on us that is now being called to the carpet on human rights issues. I must admit though the CIA should have certain liberties when the situation warrants them.

Reply to russell

$5000.00 will get you all the kit you need to intercept mobile/cell phones. It is a lot more common than people imagine.

Reply to Tom_Smart

I don't know about nowadays. Used to, you could listen in with just a scanner.

Reply to russell

Quote :

And I am watching a documentary on Hitler and his manuscript Mein Kampf and the second chapter.
How he admired the US for their techniques and methods of driving out the natives to near extinction and cordoning off in reservations which he believed them to be an inferior race. Totally thought provoking...



It is an inarguable fact that all indigenous landowners in colonialised countries have suffered horrendously - not least of all mine.

Rich, have you read Dee Armstrong's 'Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee'. Tremendous read.

2001 changed the world. Its an inarguable fact also. Home-grown bombers are the next worry. Keeping them out is not the issue as much as sussing them out - internally that is.

We've just charged fockers over here for it and they're, supposedly, Australians.

Reply to BomberBill

Most mobiles are digital now and use encryption. The problem is, encryption is only used between the phone and the base station. Base to base transmission is still relatively simple to intercept.

Reply to Tom_Smart

but as far as I know, most of base2base transmission is routed over wires...
but you're right in as far as the code they use for encrypting the wireless part of the call is possible to decrypt with today's hardware

Reply to stefan

First, Congress NEVER approved these wire taps.

Second, Congress had no right to approve said wire taps even if they had.

Third, Mr. Bush has no authority to authorize wire taps of US citizens in the USA.

Fourth, these are US citizens who have neither been accused or convicted of anything.

Fifth, if Mr. Bush thought he needed wire taps on these individuals, there are legal means for getting them.

There is no longer any debate about this spying program targeting US citizens here at home. Mr. Bush has admitted to his complicity publicly. He should now resign his office or face immediate impeachment. Unless of course you believe that the President is above the law and that the government is no longer to be bound by the Constitution. If this stands, the Constitution is completely dead insofar as it's power to restrain the government and ensure our rights a citizens.

Reply to RichPLS

"The object of terrorism is to try to force us to change our way of life, is to force us to retreat, is to force us to be what we're not. And that's -- they're going to fail. They're simply going to fail."
President Bush, October, 2001.

By his own words, they have already won.

Reply to RichPLS

Just a few of the concerns voiced by Democrat and Republican Congressmen of the Bush spying scandal taken from various Sunday morning news programs and summarized by the AP:

Quote :

Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record), R-Penn., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he intends to hold hearings. Specter said he wants Bush's advisers to cite their specific legal authority for bypassing the courts.

"The president has, I think, made up a law that we never passed," said Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis.

Harry Reid acknowledged he had been briefed on the four-year-old domestic spy program "a couple months ago" but insisted the administration bears full responsibility.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement Saturday that she had been told on several occasions about unspecified activities by the NSA. Pelosi said she expressed strong concerns at the time.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., called that troubling. If Bush is allowed to decide unilaterally who the potential terrorists are, he becomes the court," Graham said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

Reply to RichPLS

All that you cited are the left wing fringe kooks.... They have no plan of their own.... They are only driven by their hatred for Bush & nothing else.... They've lost power in all 3 branches of government & don't have a chance to get it back..... Thay all loved Clinton & he allowed us to be attacked several times on his watch & did nothing, hence their loss of power in all 3 branches.... Remember his bombing of Iraq to cover up his Monica fling... They were on the wrong side of the war then & they're on the wrong side now...

Bush is going to be President for another 3 years & the oppisition is going to loose even more in 06, before he's through.... They better get used to it....

Reply to RCPilot

RC, You know me, and you know I am conservative. I've voted for bush and have largely supported him. However on two occasions, the first being the oil companies ripping us off and the second being this so called patriot act I strongly disagree with him as my president.

Quite frankly, the patriot act itself worried me and now this business of spying on Americans without regard to the American system of checks and balances I consider totally unacceptable.

Because of terrorism we have had to endure some infringements on our liberties but a blatant disregard for our system of government that has worked for over 200 years should not be tolerated.

Lately president Bush's display of arrogance is scaring the heck out of me.

Reply to russell

Times of war, bring things to bear that normally wouldn't be.... We are at war, so things are different... There have been far harsher things done in the past during times of war as well.... Locking up the Japanese during WW2 comes to mind.... The oil co. rip off as you call it, is the law of supply & demand at work... Nothing more & nothing less.....

Reply to RCPilot

To each his own opinion. * Shrug *

Up early?

Reply to russell

Quote :

Times of war, bring things to bear that normally wouldn't be....



I agree 100%. But think about it. If they had a valid reason for spying on Americans don't you think the Justice Department would go along with it? So why was the normal procedures violated?

Reply to russell

Russ, I believe that would be because of the public's 'need to know' factor, eh? I mean, surely it would be a public relations nightmare to take it public like that and, of course, the chance of successfully gleaming the right info from those covert listen-ins would be greatly reduced.

Thats what I would have thought anyway.

I hope my government is doing it. Truly I do.

Reply to BomberBill

No, I'm not talking about taking it public. A wiretap against an American or any kind of clandestine operation such as that requires a judge's signature. At that level we're talking Justice Department and a leak from there isn't likely.

Reply to russell

Your knowlege on this is far superior to mine Russ.

How 'unlikely' is a leak though? Bush is certainly eating shite over it at the moment though, eh?

True, whats the point of law if it does not apply to the government of the day? Not much, I suspect.

Reply to BomberBill

I've been gaming, but I'm about done in tonight....

It doesn't bother me , because we haven't been attacked again since 9/11.... That's what's important to me...

The liberals want to relive there glory days of the Viet Nam war anti protesters.... They made it a mockery of the 59,000 lives that were lost.... Now they want to do the same thing in Iraq, which is too important for us & the world....

Nope, I hope they keep finding those cells here in this country, by whatever means.......

Reply to RCPilot

If they spied on me they'd just get bored and fall asleep...

Reply to TeeTewl

Quote :

If they spied on me they'd just get bored and fall asleep...



Not me. I talk dirty on the phone with my bitches! You like my use of the American vernacular there? Pretty 8) , eh?

Yep, me and my hoes, dirty styles on the phone just for the FBI Down Under Division.

Hey, look at that acronym: FBI DUD!!!!

[/Fock, I'm bored!] :cry:

Reply to BomberBill

I love you bombs...but I don't really like all the rapper references towards women...because when they NEED to be called a bitch or a ho it is not as effective. I only use that when I mean it, not as a generalization. I do not consider it "American vernacular" I consider it mental deficient vernacular...

Reply to TeeTewl

LMAO!!!!

Nice refinement, Tee! :lol:

I'll remember that when I'm done up to the nines in my 'bling bling'! cruising the 'boulevard' in my convertible with Fifty Cent thumping. :lol:

[/Jeez, I'm a shocker tonight].

White dudes trying to be black and cool etc. Its something I'll never understand. :P You're either black or not, no white dudes can do it.

Thats like comparing Miles Davis to some white dude player from today. There's just no comparison.

Reply to BomberBill

I'll never forget the Pat Boone white bread version of "Tutti Fruitti" after hearing Little Richard"s version. It was enough to make you vomit...Very few few white folks during my "coming of age" era could hold a candle to the black singers and musicians of the day. The young Elvis was one...no no not the Las Vegas Elvis the one before fame and Tom Parker ruined him...

Reply to TeeTewl

Quote :

I'll never forget the Pat Boone white bread version of "Tutti Fruitti" after hearing Little Richard"s version. It was enough to make you vomit...Very few few white folks during my "coming of age" era could hold a candle to the black singers and musicians of the day. The young Elvis was one...no no not the Las Vegas Elvis the one before fame and Tom Parker ruined him...



Oh man, aint that the truth, Tee.

Elvis was unique and the guy could do it all and do it damn fine too.

I dig jazz and I look at Miles and the dudes of his time and they're still fresh today. Top stuff!

John Lee Hooker is a personal fav of mine too. His blues are 'Carolina Smooth', baby! :D

Reply to BomberBill

The blues...love 'em...I still play a little blues with some of the locals around here...me and my ol' harmonica...

Reply to TeeTewl

Oh man, thats focking cool, thriceways you know.

Tomsmart plays the Balalaika [a focked up Russian version of the Mandolin], pansy that he is! [/totally unnecessary]. :P

Now the Harmonica is the real deal. True music, you know.

I wish I could have seen Miles D live. That would have been tops!

Reply to BomberBill

To keep the subject on the spying topic: Knowing the way our government is run now adays, how long do you think it would take to get a wiretap evertime they needed one. Way too long. The democrats, the ACLU, and all these other winers are making a big political game out of everything. The spying that is going on isnt on normal, everyday citzens. Its on communications going outside of this country to who knows where. If this spying is able to stop another attack, which it has, then I have no problem with it. We are at war with 'people' that care nothing about me or my country. We all are video taped, recorded, and 'spyed' on everyday: atm cameras, gas station cameras, department store camers, trafic cameras, phone cameras, video cameras, work email, etc...
When are people going to wake up and realize we are not living in the world of pre 9-11. Extraordinary measureas are going to have to be taken. If me losing some of my 'rights', and I use that loosly as I havent, keeps me, my family, and my country safe from these terrorists then so be.

Reply to sturm

I think ppl are too paranoid....I mean really, what are you doing that's so interesting and unique that your government is going to care that you're doing it and look in on your average life?
You're really not that interesting.....

Now if you were a celeb, maybe......but they're starting to put their lives on t.v. anyway, so I doubt that the government needs to use their high-tech equipment to spy on them anyway. They can just tune into MTV. lol.

Reply to qoop

It's all a matter of finding the balance between your security and your freedom. On one extreme we could have a 1982 style nation in which no terrorist acts happen, and on the other you have a totally "free" society that suffers major attacks like Japan suffers earthquakes.

Quite apart from this debate, the problem I see in this instance is that rather than change the law, the administration may have simply gone around (or even broken it), and that can set a dangerous precedent when government acts outside the limitations of the checks and balances in place in order to ensure you go to bed in a democracy and wake up in one.

As I say, the debate on where the line between liberty and security lies is perhaps separate to the one about the executives abilities to ignore the rule of law when it so pleases. There are already mechanisms in place for this in which, for example, a wire tapping can be ordered and then one goes to a judge after the fact, but here even that has been circumvented, so that the operation could perhaps become more of a routine, rubber stamp job.

It's the legal implications that perturb me here, rather than the debate about freedom vs security.

Reply to Aaron McKenna

I don't think I'd care if I had cameras all over my house and my phones tapped....I'm not that interesting anyway. I'm sure that there are WAY more interesting ppl other than me.

Reply to qoop

Good, then you won't mind the cameras I have in your bed and bath room!

Reply to RichPLS

lol...go for it....as long as it's not used for perverted purposes and you think it's for my personal safety! (which I doubt very much for either of them)

Reply to qoop

Oh, it is of national security and of great interest... National Security could not ever be perverted.

Reply to RichPLS

alright then.....cameras it is.

Reply to qoop

Quote :

how long do you think it would take to get a wiretap evertime they needed one.


Actually, they can set up an 'emergency' wiretap any time they need it. But they have only 36 or 48 hrs after it has been placed to make the request with the secret judge that approves them. Several thousand are approved annually that way, and ever since the wiretap legislation was passed in the '70s only 1 has been refused. Oh that several thousand was before 9/11. Currently there aren't very many made on an annual basis... wonder why? (I don't)

Mike.

Reply to fishmahn

hmm.....what do they consider an "emergency"?

Reply to qoop

Apparently, all it takes is suspician...
**glances suspicious look towards qoop!**

Reply to RichPLS

Quote :

hmm.....what do they consider an "emergency"?


Which brings me to the question of why they had to go around the law to get those wiretaps... :? :? :?

Mike.

Reply to fishmahn
Previous
1 2 3
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Now they are spying on you....
Go to:

There are 1220 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them