Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

Just a few simple questions

According to the specs off abit i can tell that this board supports
the Northwood chips and i am assuming the EE chips. Can anyone tell me
if it supports the Prescott as well? I am thinking about purchasing
one and i need to know what sort of compatibility i can have with this
processor line before buying one of them also.

TIA

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

Kinda along the same lines, I'm wondering if going Prescott is a good
idea (I have a 3.0c right now (running between 160 and 165f, with slightly
better than "stock" air cooling)) with Intel scrapping the Tejas and Jayhawk
in favor of a yet unnamed duel core chip. The "next generation" for me
would be Prescott, but I'm thinking I probably should hold out and hope my
P4c can keep me playing the latest games until Intel gets a plan together???

(-: FireFox :-)

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Sun, 9 May 2004 00:21:25 -0400, "FireFox" <firefox11@charter.net>
wrote:

> Kinda along the same lines, I'm wondering if going Prescott is a good
>idea (I have a 3.0c right now (running between 160 and 165f, with slightly
>better than "stock" air cooling)) with Intel scrapping the Tejas and Jayhawk
>in favor of a yet unnamed duel core chip. The "next generation" for me
>would be Prescott, but I'm thinking I probably should hold out and hope my
>P4c can keep me playing the latest games until Intel gets a plan together???
>
>(-: FireFox :-)
>


Well i already have an 845 chipset board with a 2.53 533mhz. The only
reason i am thinking about this is for the dual channel memory and a
little breathing room later if i want to put a 3.x processor in. I am
currently happy with my P4 but i would like to take advantage of the
performance increases dual ddr gives

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

current Prescott chips are running a tad warm and not real impressive in
terms of performance over a Northwood. I'd get a 2.6c or 2.8c myself... I
just finished buying a 2.8c for an upgrade over a 2.2/533 model and it made
a nice improvement in performance and the HT was recognized by XP without
problem.

--

Thomas Geery
Network+ certified

ftp://geerynet.d2g.com
ftp://68.98.180.8 Abit Mirror <----- Cable modem IP
This IP is dynamic so it *could* change!...
over 130,000 FTP users served!
^^^^^^^




"NoneOfBusiness" <NoneOfBusiness@nob.net> wrote in message
news:7h0r90h85qhahob8sklieqi3h5r5eil3mt@4ax.com...
> Just a few simple questions
>
> According to the specs off abit i can tell that this board supports
> the Northwood chips and i am assuming the EE chips. Can anyone tell me
> if it supports the Prescott as well? I am thinking about purchasing
> one and i need to know what sort of compatibility i can have with this
> processor line before buying one of them also.
>
> TIA

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Sun, 9 May 2004 16:29:22 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
wrote:

>current Prescott chips are running a tad warm and not real impressive in
>terms of performance over a Northwood. I'd get a 2.6c or 2.8c myself... I
>just finished buying a 2.8c for an upgrade over a 2.2/533 model and it made
>a nice improvement in performance and the HT was recognized by XP without
>problem.


Does anyone know if there are still issues with HT and SB
Audigy/Audigy 2 lines of cards or did creative finally address these
issues with driver upgrades?

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

"NoneOfBusiness" <NoneOfBusiness@nob.net> wrote in message..
> Does anyone know if there are still issues with HT and SB
> Audigy/Audigy 2 lines of cards or did creative finally address these
> issues with driver upgrades?

Jeesh, have you been hiding under a stone or something? Creative sorted that
out probably over a year ago.
--


Richard Hopkins
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
(replace .nospam with .com in reply address)

The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com
Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Mon, 10 May 2004 16:16:55 +0100, "Richard Hopkins"
<richh@dsl.nospam.co.uk> wrote:

>"NoneOfBusiness" <NoneOfBusiness@nob.net> wrote in message..
>> Does anyone know if there are still issues with HT and SB
>> Audigy/Audigy 2 lines of cards or did creative finally address these
>> issues with driver upgrades?
>
>Jeesh, have you been hiding under a stone or something? Creative sorted that
>out probably over a year ago.

no i have not been hiding under a stone, but i also do not primarily
use pentium systems either. I am much more familiar with Athlon
systems. And with creative you never know.

Do me a favor, if i ask something in this newsgroup again, just STFU
and do not reply at all. Your responses are useless and uncalled for
and there are many others who would be willing to help without being a
dick about it.

Cheerio mate. *Plonk*

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

no issues here with HT and an Audigy installed...

--

Thomas Geery
Network+ certified

ftp://geerynet.d2g.com
ftp://68.98.180.8 Abit Mirror <----- Cable modem IP
This IP is dynamic so it *could* change!...
over 130,000 FTP users served!
^^^^^^^




"NoneOfBusiness" <NoneOfBusiness@nob.net> wrote in message
newsant90lts5r7v9h093bturdnc0ls86s8h3@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 9 May 2004 16:29:22 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >current Prescott chips are running a tad warm and not real impressive in
> >terms of performance over a Northwood. I'd get a 2.6c or 2.8c myself...
I
> >just finished buying a 2.8c for an upgrade over a 2.2/533 model and it
made
> >a nice improvement in performance and the HT was recognized by XP without
> >problem.
>
>
> Does anyone know if there are still issues with HT and SB
> Audigy/Audigy 2 lines of cards or did creative finally address these
> issues with driver upgrades?

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Tue, 11 May 2004 06:51:22 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
wrote:

>no issues here with HT and an Audigy installed...

There are a few games that have isssues with HT. Some people disable
HT because it does little for them in real world useage.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Sun, 09 May 2004 21:39:06 -0400, NoneOfBusiness
<NoneOfBusiness@nob.net> wrote:


>I am not as worried about future compatibility as i am an increase in
>performance. The main reason i would consider this is for the dual
>channel ddr support. I would probably upgrade to a faster chip with
>the 800mhz FSB (Northwood or Prescott, if performance is better) in a
>few months but just use my current p4 until then. Then i could wait
>another year or two without upgrading processors again and by that
>point who knows how things are going to be ya know?

Dual channel doesn't give you all that much of a performance increase.
Personally, if I was building a new system today I would go with
AMD64. More bang for the buck.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

"Slug" <no@email.here> wrote in message
news:hfc4a0t1briqutqqdbcvdqm0l2o4qihf9a@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 06:51:22 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >no issues here with HT and an Audigy installed...
>
> There are a few games that have isssues with HT. Some people disable
> HT because it does little for them in real world useage.

Which games? I'm getting some bad fps in Startrek elite force 2 , using a
3.2GHz HT P4 and 9600Radeon.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Wed, 12 May 2004 07:20:24 -0700, Slug <no@email.here> wrote:

>On Sun, 09 May 2004 21:39:06 -0400, NoneOfBusiness
><NoneOfBusiness@nob.net> wrote:
>
>
>>I am not as worried about future compatibility as i am an increase in
>>performance. The main reason i would consider this is for the dual
>>channel ddr support. I would probably upgrade to a faster chip with
>>the 800mhz FSB (Northwood or Prescott, if performance is better) in a
>>few months but just use my current p4 until then. Then i could wait
>>another year or two without upgrading processors again and by that
>>point who knows how things are going to be ya know?
>
>Dual channel doesn't give you all that much of a performance increase.
>Personally, if I was building a new system today I would go with
>AMD64. More bang for the buck.


I have thought about that too but i don't feel i need to build a
completely new system yet to replace this pc. I already have one
athlon 64 3200 and am perfectly happy with it. An upgraded motherboard
and maybe another processor later is cheaper for me. I just want to
squeeze some more performance out of this existing setup for a while
longer (1 year+) and see how things shake out then.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Tue, 11 May 2004 06:51:22 -0400, "TomG" <tgeery-NOSPAM-@cox.net>
wrote:

>no issues here with HT and an Audigy installed...


Thank you for a helpful answer without being a smartass like some
others.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:43:32 GMT, "Asestar" <a s e s t a r @ s t a r t
.. n o> wrote:


>Which games? I'm getting some bad fps in Startrek elite force 2 , using a
>3.2GHz HT P4 and 9600Radeon.
>

I'm not sure which ones as I don't have an HT cpu myself. But I have
read of them on usenet. Do a google groups search.