Ad
News

The hard drive turns 50

Published on September 13, 2006

The hard drive on Wednesday turned 50. Read more

WD intros 120 GB portable Passport hard drive

Published on February 07, 2006

Western Digital (WD) today announced a 120 GB version of its portable "Passport" hard drive series. Read more

Sony debuts CF Type II-compatible hard drive, to compete with flash

Published on November 08, 2005

Signaling the fact that hard drive technology is nowhere near obsolescence, Sony Electronics announced this morning the release later this month to the US market, of a 5 Gb hard drive measuring 1.5 inches per side, that can fit in existing Compact Flash Type II slots. Read more

Samsung joins the perpendicular hard drive party

Published on November 14, 2006

Samsung today announced that it has begun offering 2.5" notebook hard drives that integrate perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) technology. The new "M80" series is available in SATA and PATA versions with capacities of 80 GB, 120 GB and 160 GB. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 1

Published on November 05, 2008

Welcome to the first installment in our six-part Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide. In Part 1, two beautiful models help showcase some of our favorite no-hassle hardware gifts for 2008. Read more

Round Up: Five Powerful, Light Ultraportables

Published on November 05, 2008

Executives, road warriors, and gadget geeks all lust after ultraportable notebooks. Five of these amazing machines battle it out in this roundup. Read more

Core i7: 4-Way CrossFire, 3-way SLI, Paradise?

Published on November 04, 2008

For the first time ever, gamers are being treated to a reasonably priced platform enabling the best that AMD and Nvidia have to offer. Is Core i7 a gamer’s nirvana or does the processor serve up more of the same? Read more

Editor's Corner: Overclocking Core i7

Published on November 04, 2008

After discovering Intel's Overspeed Protection in yesterday's first-look at Core i7's performance, we're back to set the record straight on the overclocking headroom of the flagship 965 Extreme and entry-level Core i7 920. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Abit » Hard drive sequence
 

Hard drive sequence




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Hard drive sequence
 
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

 

I added two more hard ATA drives to my AT7 mobo above the two I already have,
and put them off of IDE3, where my first two hard drives are on IDE1 and a
DVD-ROM and Zip disk are on IDE2.

What determines the order of the hard drives as the BIOS sees them ? In other
words, I have HDD0 as one of the drives in the boot sequence. Does this
designation change when I add new drives ?

The reason I ask this is that I have a boot loader, actually System Commander,
which is a very good product, and once I attached my two hard drives to IDE3
System Commander appeared to no longer find the operating systems that are
bootable on my IDE1 hard drives and appeared to be looking for the data on my
IDE3 hard drives, which are not even formatted yet.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

 

the bios typically enumerates the drives in the order of the IDE
controllers. so, my experience is that HDD0 would be the first hard drive
that the system enumerates as it goes down through the IDE controllers. the
only way I can see a change to the designation to HDD0 is if you inserted a
drive onto a controller that got enumerated *prior* to a drive that had
already been HDD0.

for example, if you had previously not had a drive on IDE1 as master but had
it on IDE1 as slave or IDE2 and then inserted a drive onto IDE1 as Master,
it would take on HDD0 designation in my experience.

now, an entirely different matter is what the partitions do when you put
drives onto the system and that can be influenced by whether the partitions
are primary or logical drives in extended partitions. primary partitions
being installed onto the system can bump extended partitions further down,
in my experience.

--

Thomas Geery
Network+ certified

Due to a rat in da hood,
no longer running servers on Cox...

(even though someone turned me in,
what can I expect for violating the AUP, right?)


"Edward Diener No Spam" <eldiener_no_spam_here@earthlink.net> wrote in
message news:hADIe.953$Je.435@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>I added two more hard ATA drives to my AT7 mobo above the two I already
>have,
> and put them off of IDE3, where my first two hard drives are on IDE1 and a
> DVD-ROM and Zip disk are on IDE2.
>
> What determines the order of the hard drives as the BIOS sees them ? In
> other words, I have HDD0 as one of the drives in the boot sequence. Does
> this designation change when I add new drives ?
>
> The reason I ask this is that I have a boot loader, actually System
> Commander,
> which is a very good product, and once I attached my two hard drives to
> IDE3
> System Commander appeared to no longer find the operating systems that are
> bootable on my IDE1 hard drives and appeared to be looking for the data on
> my
> IDE3 hard drives, which are not even formatted yet.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit (More info?)

 

TomG wrote:
> the bios typically enumerates the drives in the order of the IDE
> controllers. so, my experience is that HDD0 would be the first hard drive
> that the system enumerates as it goes down through the IDE controllers. the
> only way I can see a change to the designation to HDD0 is if you inserted a
> drive onto a controller that got enumerated *prior* to a drive that had
> already been HDD0.
>
> for example, if you had previously not had a drive on IDE1 as master but had
> it on IDE1 as slave or IDE2 and then inserted a drive onto IDE1 as Master,
> it would take on HDD0 designation in my experience.

Thanks for the explanation.

>
> now, an entirely different matter is what the partitions do when you put
> drives onto the system and that can be influenced by whether the partitions
> are primary or logical drives in extended partitions. primary partitions
> being installed onto the system can bump extended partitions further down,
> in my experience.

OK, I understand that. My new drives should not be partitoned at all from the
factory as far as I know. I will query the System Commander people to see what
they say.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Abit » Hard drive sequence

Go to:
 

Google Ads