Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > Asus > Corsair memory wierdness with A7N8X's (way to save money)

Corsair memory wierdness with A7N8X's (way to save money)

Forum Motherboards & Memory : Asus - Corsair memory wierdness with A7N8X's (way to save money)

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

I have two identical A7N8X systems, except that for one
I accidentally ordered a different grade of Corsair XMS
PC3200 memory. In one machine I have stuff that runs
at 200Mhz at 6-3-3-2, manually set since SPD is wrong.
In the other, I have a lower grade which runs at 8-3-3-3
at 200Mhz (and will fail if set lower). Both have the same
processor (3200+).

The weird thing is that these two systems perform
identically! In fact, I was at first getting lower numbers
on the 6-3-3-2 machine until I found that it had a debug
ethernet driver that was costing me a couple percent of
the CPU.

The symmetry in performance holds for all benchmarks,
including SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth. Both get
2950/2750. So why pay extra for the lower latency
stuff if they perform the same? I saved about $50 due
to this apparently fortunate accident.

Maybe I am doing something wrong with the faster
memory, but I'm at a loss to figure it out. Is anyone
getting more than 2950 for the bandwidth with the
PC3200C2 at 200Mhz?

Alan

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

Corsair XMS
SiSoft Sandra says 3044 (no overclocking)


"Alan Wright" <alanatyahoodotcom> wrote in message
news:wPCdnXlQx9UmHR3dRVn-jg@giganews.com...
> I have two identical A7N8X systems, except that for one
> I accidentally ordered a different grade of Corsair XMS
> PC3200 memory. In one machine I have stuff that runs
> at 200Mhz at 6-3-3-2, manually set since SPD is wrong.
> In the other, I have a lower grade which runs at 8-3-3-3
> at 200Mhz (and will fail if set lower). Both have the same
> processor (3200+).
>
> The weird thing is that these two systems perform
> identically! In fact, I was at first getting lower numbers
> on the 6-3-3-2 machine until I found that it had a debug
> ethernet driver that was costing me a couple percent of
> the CPU.
>
> The symmetry in performance holds for all benchmarks,
> including SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth. Both get
> 2950/2750. So why pay extra for the lower latency
> stuff if they perform the same? I saved about $50 due
> to this apparently fortunate accident.
>
> Maybe I am doing something wrong with the faster
> memory, but I'm at a loss to figure it out. Is anyone
> getting more than 2950 for the bandwidth with the
> PC3200C2 at 200Mhz?
>
> Alan
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

Timings?

Alan

"Mike Butler" <mnb0@flash.net> wrote in message
news:Oy%fc.17935$9P6.13614@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
>
> Corsair XMS
> SiSoft Sandra says 3044 (no overclocking)
>
>
> "Alan Wright" <alanatyahoodotcom> wrote in message
> news:wPCdnXlQx9UmHR3dRVn-jg@giganews.com...
> > I have two identical A7N8X systems, except that for one
> > I accidentally ordered a different grade of Corsair XMS
> > PC3200 memory. In one machine I have stuff that runs
> > at 200Mhz at 6-3-3-2, manually set since SPD is wrong.
> > In the other, I have a lower grade which runs at 8-3-3-3
> > at 200Mhz (and will fail if set lower). Both have the same
> > processor (3200+).
> >
> > The weird thing is that these two systems perform
> > identically! In fact, I was at first getting lower numbers
> > on the 6-3-3-2 machine until I found that it had a debug
> > ethernet driver that was costing me a couple percent of
> > the CPU.
> >
> > The symmetry in performance holds for all benchmarks,
> > including SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth. Both get
> > 2950/2750. So why pay extra for the lower latency
> > stuff if they perform the same? I saved about $50 due
> > to this apparently fortunate accident.
> >
> > Maybe I am doing something wrong with the faster
> > memory, but I'm at a loss to figure it out. Is anyone
> > getting more than 2950 for the bandwidth with the
> > PC3200C2 at 200Mhz?
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

>I have two identical A7N8X systems, except that for one
>I accidentally ordered a different grade of Corsair XMS
>PC3200 memory. In one machine I have stuff that runs
>at 200Mhz at 6-3-3-2, manually set since SPD is wrong.
>In the other, I have a lower grade which runs at 8-3-3-3
>at 200Mhz (and will fail if set lower). Both have the same
>processor (3200+).
>
>The weird thing is that these two systems perform
>identically! In fact, I was at first getting lower numbers
>on the 6-3-3-2 machine until I found that it had a debug
>ethernet driver that was costing me a couple percent of
>the CPU.
>
>The symmetry in performance holds for all benchmarks,
>including SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth. Both get
>2950/2750. So why pay extra for the lower latency
>stuff if they perform the same? I saved about $50 due
>to this apparently fortunate accident.
>
>Maybe I am doing something wrong with the faster
>memory, but I'm at a loss to figure it out. Is anyone
>getting more than 2950 for the bandwidth with the
>PC3200C2 at 200Mhz?
>
>Alan
>
For a better RAM score change that 6 to 10 or 11.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

"Andrew J" <ajpk3@hotmail.comremove> wrote in message
news:os61805bhq0si1f0966tees4l4kuro3inv@4ax.com...
>
>
> >I have two identical A7N8X systems, except that for one
> >I accidentally ordered a different grade of Corsair XMS
> >PC3200 memory. In one machine I have stuff that runs
> >at 200Mhz at 6-3-3-2, manually set since SPD is wrong.
> >In the other, I have a lower grade which runs at 8-3-3-3
> >at 200Mhz (and will fail if set lower). Both have the same
> >processor (3200+).
> >
> >The weird thing is that these two systems perform
> >identically! In fact, I was at first getting lower numbers
> >on the 6-3-3-2 machine until I found that it had a debug
> >ethernet driver that was costing me a couple percent of
> >the CPU.
> >
> >The symmetry in performance holds for all benchmarks,
> >including SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth. Both get
> >2950/2750. So why pay extra for the lower latency
> >stuff if they perform the same? I saved about $50 due
> >to this apparently fortunate accident.
> >
> >Maybe I am doing something wrong with the faster
> >memory, but I'm at a loss to figure it out. Is anyone
> >getting more than 2950 for the bandwidth with the
> >PC3200C2 at 200Mhz?
> >
> >Alan
> >
> For a better RAM score change that 6 to 10 or 11.

Why is that?

I did try changing it to 8-3-3-3 to match the other system.
There was a small decrease in scores. Maybe noise.

Alan

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

>Why is that?

This is a known boost on most NF2 boards. They like the little delay
to get charged up.
_________________________
French Connection:
http://www.metrospy.com/boycott_brands.htm

Reply to AJ
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:56:30 -0600, "Alan Wright" <alanatyahoodotcom> wrote:

>I have two identical A7N8X systems, except that for one
>I accidentally ordered a different grade of Corsair XMS
>PC3200 memory. In one machine I have stuff that runs
>at 200Mhz at 6-3-3-2, manually set since SPD is wrong.
>In the other, I have a lower grade which runs at 8-3-3-3
>at 200Mhz (and will fail if set lower). Both have the same
>processor (3200+).
>
>The weird thing is that these two systems perform
>identically! In fact, I was at first getting lower numbers
>on the 6-3-3-2 machine until I found that it had a debug
>ethernet driver that was costing me a couple percent of
>the CPU.
>
>The symmetry in performance holds for all benchmarks,
>including SiSoft Sandra memory bandwidth. Both get
>2950/2750. So why pay extra for the lower latency
>stuff if they perform the same? I saved about $50 due
>to this apparently fortunate accident.
>
>Maybe I am doing something wrong with the faster
>memory, but I'm at a loss to figure it out. Is anyone
>getting more than 2950 for the bandwidth with the
>PC3200C2 at 200Mhz?
>
>Alan
>

Have your tried it with buffering off in sandra?
some of my unbuffered tests - http://tinyurl.com/38ozj

Ed

Reply to Ed
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > Asus > Corsair memory wierdness with A7N8X's (way to save money)
Go to:

There are 712 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them