Well, according to <A HREF="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20805.html" target="_new">The Register</A>, Windows XP has started blocking 'non-XP compliant' programs from being used in XP. They have to be certified and bear the XP logo of certification. With this in mind...
<b>Is Microsoft evil?</b>
-----------------
Whoever thinks up a good sig for me gets a prize
I can't answer based on the fact that this is semi-true. There is no indication that M$ will do this for the end product. Heck, they even blocked AOL from being installed, and AOL and M$ have been happily trying to do some important internet apps together. I personally think M$ is blocking these apps on XP to finish beta testing everything they need to for the CORE OS. I think they were having too many problems testing every current app and they are reducing the number of supported apps until they fix the bugs on the major apps. XP is quite the ambitious (and actually needed) change for Windows. ME was a mistake and a joke (or a really well designed money maker off of stupid people -- think of not just the money from ME but the money to upgrade servers to be complient with ME network protocols -- a lot of universities and businesses had fun with that one ). Microsoft is pretty evil, yes, but i'm still not seeing anything better stepping up as of yet. Time will tell though, right? And i do like a lot of M$'s software developement tools. I mean SourceSafe is pretty much an industry standard, and i'm still looking for something to beat Interdev for asp developement. Granted, we can flog MS for making VB in the first place and for going beyond Win98 consumer wise (i really do like the upgrade from NT to 2k though!). M$ has been and will always be a hate/love relationship
Althons and Pentiums are just melted rock. Who’s rock is better? Who cares, let’s play some games
It's really tough to tell what their intentions are though. I personally hate MS, but really hope XP will work out.
Remember how they were going to make Office XP a subscription software? My CD is actually a subscription version (I'm going to get a code to bypass that from MS, but I'm in no hurry since I think XP sucks). Well I think they are trying to push the consumer to the limit lately and they'll only stop when we scream.
On a side note, I was using OSX for the first time yesterday and really liked it. I didn't explore to much of it, but my first impression was pretty damn good.
<font color=red>Yeah, I took a crap on your lawn. Whatcha gonna do about it?</font color=red>
Updated Vote Option: <<< Cracking out Linux Bible and going solo (no dual boot) on Laptop with RedHat 7.0 for the next 3 weeks, along with a C++ Bible.
<i><a href='modules.php?name=Forums&file=faq&msg=1>See Note</a></i>
I dont know about the actual AOL software, but you can use AOL Instant Messanger software in windows XP RC1 and RC2. I would never ever install AOL software on my machine so I can not verify that end of it. I have not had any problems with installing anything that is a competing product of any Microsoft product. The only problem that I know of it that that IE6 beta does not play nice with the Apple quicktime plugin. Thats the only problem that I know of with XP and competing products. Anything else would have been bitched and moaned about all over the WPP newsgroup. As for according to the Register, this registers high on the bullsh|t scale!
ID10T errors are the cause of most consumer's computer problems.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.