1.6ghz to 3.06 upgrade on p4s533 worth it ?

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

My son wants to upgrade his processor on an Asus p4s533 from 1.6GHz (
currently set in BIOS for 2.1 GHz ) to a 3.06 GHz. Difference between true
1.6 and overclocked 2.1 was not really noticable. Anyone have an opinion -
will the 3.06GHz provide a noticable difference for him ( primarialy a
gamer ) and worth the 250 bucks ? He's running mushkin pc2700 512 MB ram.
He's also considering buying another 512 - also much difference ? I have to
verify, but I think he's got 2 256 sticks in there, so he could really ony
put 1 more. Get a 256 stick ? or 512 stick and put in first slot ? and other
2 behind the 512 stick ?

Thanks in advance

devon
 

Paul

Splendid
Mar 30, 2004
5,267
0
25,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <spKdnXlZ57Tcb3vdRVn-hg@adelphia.com>, "silient1"
<vegas4craps63NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

> My son wants to upgrade his processor on an Asus p4s533 from 1.6GHz (
> currently set in BIOS for 2.1 GHz ) to a 3.06 GHz. Difference between true
> 1.6 and overclocked 2.1 was not really noticable. Anyone have an opinion -
> will the 3.06GHz provide a noticable difference for him ( primarialy a
> gamer ) and worth the 250 bucks ? He's running mushkin pc2700 512 MB ram.
> He's also considering buying another 512 - also much difference ? I have to
> verify, but I think he's got 2 256 sticks in there, so he could really ony
> put 1 more. Get a 256 stick ? or 512 stick and put in first slot ? and other
> 2 behind the 512 stick ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> devon

If you buy this one:
P4 3.06GHz/FSB533/512KB cache (Northwood) $229 Newegg

expect compute bound applications to run 3.06/2.1 or about 1.5 times
faster. Now, the new processor supports hyperthreading, which makes
the desktop a bit more responsive in an OS like WinXP, but your
motherboard doesn't. This doesn't prevent the processor from running,
it just subtracts a tiny bit from the experience.

On a gaming machine, you need both a good processor and a good video
card. Increasing one without the other, won't result in a measurable
difference. If you had an FX5200 video card or an ATI7000, all the
processor in the world isn't going to help.

Upgrading is always an expensive habit :)

You might also consider a motherboard upgrade. A motherboard
that offers support for FSB800, and dual channel memory, will
give you about 20% more performance for the same processor clock
rate. This is because the processor isn't starved for memory
bandwidth like it would be on a single channel board at FSB533.

I've selected the Northwood processors, as they run cooler.
For example, my 2.8C draws just 13.2 watts sitting in the desktop.

P4C 3.0GHz/FSB800/512KB cache (Northwood) $214 Newegg
P4C 2.8GHz/FSB800/512KB cache (Northwood) $179 Newegg

Here are a couple of dual channel boards. The P4P800se uses
an Intel chipset (and doesn't have a lot of unneeded onboard
peripherals). The P4S800D-E uses an SIS chipset and the few
people who have tried them in this group say there were no
issues setting one up. The P4S800D-E has more onboard peripherals
but I wouldn't count them as a benefit.

http://usa.asus.com/prog/spec.asp?m=P4P800%20SE&langs=09 ($95 Newegg)
http://www.asus.com.tw/support/download/item.aspx?ModelName=P4P800%20SE

http://www.asus.com/prog/spec.asp?m=P4S800D-E%20Deluxe&langs=01 ($101)
http://www.asus.com.tw/support/download/item.aspx?ModelName=P4S800D-E%20Deluxe

Socket 478 is on the way out, so whatever you decide, it is probably
the last upgrade you'll do with socket 478.

The same goes for video cards. The AGP cards are being phased out too,
so if you buy say an ATI9800 Pro, the motherboard you plug it into could
likely be the last motherboard it sees.

If the two 256MB memories match in terms of their design, then they
will enable dual channel operation on the two motherboards above.

Before buying any motherboard, download the manual from the download
page. I've included links to the download pages above. Examine the
pictures of the BIOS screens, to see if the necessary adjustments
are in the BIOS, for overclocking and adjusting ram timings and the
like. Reading the manual now, means no surprises later.

Lastly, this page tells you what processors the new boards support:
http://www.asus.com.tw/support/cpusupport/cpusupport.aspx

HTH,
Paul
 

Paul

Splendid
Mar 30, 2004
5,267
0
25,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <csadnZ4EXOxkh3rdRVn-gg@adelphia.com>, "silient1"
<vegas4craps63NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> Wow, excellent information. Now I just have to spend my 4th of July
> weekend researching everything you mentioned :)
>
> Fot starters, his video card is ATI 9600XT, and I confirmed that there
> is only (1) 512MB stick.
> So he would need another stick to take advantage of the dual-threading.
>
> If we go with the motherboard, does the onboard sound ( need 5.1 ) take
> less resources that his (very) recently purchased Audigy2 ZS Platinum.
> He's running Kipsch DMX D-5.1 speakers which inclue thier own digital
> encoder. Problem is that it turns out that I can't use the optical or
> SPDIF outputs of the card ( seems to be proprietary for Creative ).
> (see link for info i was provided)
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=oBDFc.375%248_3.29%40newsfe2-win.ntli.net
>
> I'd like to get a board that has has the nVidia Soundstream ( I think )
> or somthing comparable.
>
> So I guess my request is... Suggestions for an 800FSB dual channel MB
> with onboard nVidia Soundstream or equivilent.
>
> He does like the input capabilities of the Audigy2, because he can input
> his guitar and record, but he's still considering his options.
>
> I may need to start a new thread but await any responses...
>
> Thanks Paul - you were a great help.
>
> Devon
>
<<snip>>

First of all, dual channel matching varies between chipsets. For
example, dual channel on Intel requires the second stick to use the
same width of chips ( say (16) 32Mx8 chips on each module ). If
you go AMD/Nforce2, the matching is a bit more relaxed, and there
you more or less match the size of modules, as you could have x8
chips on one module, and x16 on another module. Matching orphan
modules takes a little more research, as every chipset family will
be a little different.

I don't know if I would steer my computer purchase, around a choice
of sound chips. For example, I would think the analog output of
the Audigy would blow away any motherboard sound chip, and if I
had an Audigy in my possession, the connectors on the motherboard
would never get used :)

The trick with the SPDIF output, is it is basically stereo, as you've
discovered. There is some option, to reduce the number of bits
per audio sample, and make four channels, but I haven't read of
any hardware that uses that option.

To send five channels, over a two channel interface, requires a
coding scheme. There is a patent on the AC3 method, owned by Dolby
Labs, and a device or program that does encoding, owes Dolby Labs
a license fee for the right to use the method. I think if you have
a DVD, for example, and it has AC3 encoded output, that can flow
straight through your existing hardware path to your stereo, and
you should hear five channels. In that case, the company making the
DVD paid for the right to encode AC3 in the tracks on the DVD, and
your motherboard is a "straight wire" to the stereo. So, anyone
should be able to enjoy a DVD that way via SPDIF.

The Nforce2 chipset, with the MCP-T Southbridge, has a DSP block,
and as far as I know, Nvidia has licensed the right to encode
AC3, to be sent over the SPDIF. That means the MCP-T can encode
an unencoded source and send that. You may want to verify this on
the Nvidia web site. (I don't know why a software program couldn't
do this with any SPDIF device though - barring delay issues.)

nForceAudioControl.pdf manual from Nvidia
http://www.nvidia.com/object/LO_20021002_6443.html

APU_TechBrief_71502.pdf (Soundstorm feature set)
http://www.nvidia.com/object/LO_20020712_6735.html

Soundstorm is available on the A7N8X Deluxe or the A7N8X-E Deluxe
(the -E is the one you'll currently find in shops). These boards
have the MCP-T Southbridge on them. ($99 at Newegg)

You'll need an AthlonXP to go with it. Here is a summary of models:
http://www.qdi.nl/support/CPUQDISocketA.htm

First up, a 2500+ FSB333 Barton ($80). People overclock these routinely
to FSB400. They are multiplier locked, so playing with the FSB is the
only adjustment. With your current PC2700 DIMM, that would operate
at 1:1 at stock speed. If you overclock the FSB, then the memory
bus will have to run slower (83% setting). If you get memory errors
in memtest86, you can move the two DIMMs onto one channel, which will
fix it. If it behaves itself, you can run dual channel, with one
DIMM on each channel. (There are three DIMM slots, two on one channel
and one on the other channel.) When overclocked, this processor runs
at 1833MHz x 400/333 = 2200MHz, equivalent to Barton 3200+.

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-103-379&depa=0

If you buy an actual Barton 3200+ FSB400, expect to fork out $187.
That is the attraction of overclocking the 2500+.
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-103-390&depa=0

Finally, some people have been using the AthlonXP-M mobile processors.
These are multiplier unlocked, due to the Powernow heat management feature.
Overclocking to more than 2200MHz is possible with these processors,
as long as you have good ram to experiment with. It looks like the
Mobile 2600+ FSB266 for $95 (OEM - no heatsink/fan) can easily do
200x12, which is faster than the Barton 3200+. Since AMD boards
make great gaming platforms, your $200 will go a lot farther than
with Intel. (Note: 200x12 means 200Mhz clock fed to processor, causing
FSB400 transfer rates to Northbridge. The multiplier applies to the
clock and not the FSB value. It is easy to get confused...)

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?submit=property&catalog=343&propertycodevalue=4181,%200,%200,%200,%200,%200,%200,%200&minprice=&maxprice=&mfrcode=1028&DEPA=0&InnerCata=343

Consult cpudatabase.com for overclocking statistics.

If I didn't have to control my compulsion for upgrading, I'd buy one
of these myself :)

Visit the forums of nforcershq.com for more info on doing
stuff with Nforce2.

Paul
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

Just a thought, but make sure you are CPU or memory bound before you
start throwing money at the problem. Use Windows System/Performance
monitor to make sure. On 90% of the systems out there disk is the
biggest bottleneck. My laptop performance was horrendous, until I
turned off paging entirely in XP. XP pages way too much stuff.
Performance is still pretty bad because I have a slow laptop drive.
Gaming may be a completely different story, but if your CPU bound it
is pretty easy to see in Perf Mon.

mitchd123


nospam@needed.com (Paul) wrote in message news:<nospam-0307042300210001@192.168.1.177>...
> In article <csadnZ4EXOxkh3rdRVn-gg@adelphia.com>, "silient1"
> <vegas4craps63NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Paul,
> >
> > Wow, excellent information. Now I just have to spend my 4th of July
> > weekend researching everything you mentioned :)
> >
> > Fot starters, his video card is ATI 9600XT, and I confirmed that there
> > is only (1) 512MB stick.
> > So he would need another stick to take advantage of the dual-threading.
> >
> > If we go with the motherboard, does the onboard sound ( need 5.1 ) take
> > less resources that his (very) recently purchased Audigy2 ZS Platinum.
> > He's running Kipsch DMX D-5.1 speakers which inclue thier own digital
> > encoder. Problem is that it turns out that I can't use the optical or
> > SPDIF outputs of the card ( seems to be proprietary for Creative ).
> > (see link for info i was provided)
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=oBDFc.375%248_3.29%40newsfe2-win.ntli.net
> >
> > I'd like to get a board that has has the nVidia Soundstream ( I think )
> > or somthing comparable.
> >
> > So I guess my request is... Suggestions for an 800FSB dual channel MB
> > with onboard nVidia Soundstream or equivilent.
> >
> > He does like the input capabilities of the Audigy2, because he can input
> > his guitar and record, but he's still considering his options.
> >
> > I may need to start a new thread but await any responses...
> >
> > Thanks Paul - you were a great help.
> >
> > Devon
> >
> <<snip>>
>
> First of all, dual channel matching varies between chipsets. For
> example, dual channel on Intel requires the second stick to use the
> same width of chips ( say (16) 32Mx8 chips on each module ). If
> you go AMD/Nforce2, the matching is a bit more relaxed, and there
> you more or less match the size of modules, as you could have x8
> chips on one module, and x16 on another module. Matching orphan
> modules takes a little more research, as every chipset family will
> be a little different.
>
> I don't know if I would steer my computer purchase, around a choice
> of sound chips. For example, I would think the analog output of
> the Audigy would blow away any motherboard sound chip, and if I
> had an Audigy in my possession, the connectors on the motherboard
> would never get used :)
>
> The trick with the SPDIF output, is it is basically stereo, as you've
> discovered. There is some option, to reduce the number of bits
> per audio sample, and make four channels, but I haven't read of
> any hardware that uses that option.
>
> To send five channels, over a two channel interface, requires a
> coding scheme. There is a patent on the AC3 method, owned by Dolby
> Labs, and a device or program that does encoding, owes Dolby Labs
> a license fee for the right to use the method. I think if you have
> a DVD, for example, and it has AC3 encoded output, that can flow
> straight through your existing hardware path to your stereo, and
> you should hear five channels. In that case, the company making the
> DVD paid for the right to encode AC3 in the tracks on the DVD, and
> your motherboard is a "straight wire" to the stereo. So, anyone
> should be able to enjoy a DVD that way via SPDIF.
>
> The Nforce2 chipset, with the MCP-T Southbridge, has a DSP block,
> and as far as I know, Nvidia has licensed the right to encode
> AC3, to be sent over the SPDIF. That means the MCP-T can encode
> an unencoded source and send that. You may want to verify this on
> the Nvidia web site. (I don't know why a software program couldn't
> do this with any SPDIF device though - barring delay issues.)
>
> nForceAudioControl.pdf manual from Nvidia
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/LO_20021002_6443.html
>
> APU_TechBrief_71502.pdf (Soundstorm feature set)
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/LO_20020712_6735.html
>
> Soundstorm is available on the A7N8X Deluxe or the A7N8X-E Deluxe
> (the -E is the one you'll currently find in shops). These boards
> have the MCP-T Southbridge on them. ($99 at Newegg)
>
> You'll need an AthlonXP to go with it. Here is a summary of models:
> http://www.qdi.nl/support/CPUQDISocketA.htm
>
> First up, a 2500+ FSB333 Barton ($80). People overclock these routinely
> to FSB400. They are multiplier locked, so playing with the FSB is the
> only adjustment. With your current PC2700 DIMM, that would operate
> at 1:1 at stock speed. If you overclock the FSB, then the memory
> bus will have to run slower (83% setting). If you get memory errors
> in memtest86, you can move the two DIMMs onto one channel, which will
> fix it. If it behaves itself, you can run dual channel, with one
> DIMM on each channel. (There are three DIMM slots, two on one channel
> and one on the other channel.) When overclocked, this processor runs
> at 1833MHz x 400/333 = 2200MHz, equivalent to Barton 3200+.
>
> http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-103-379&depa=0
>
> If you buy an actual Barton 3200+ FSB400, expect to fork out $187.
> That is the attraction of overclocking the 2500+.
> http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-103-390&depa=0
>
> Finally, some people have been using the AthlonXP-M mobile processors.
> These are multiplier unlocked, due to the Powernow heat management feature.
> Overclocking to more than 2200MHz is possible with these processors,
> as long as you have good ram to experiment with. It looks like the
> Mobile 2600+ FSB266 for $95 (OEM - no heatsink/fan) can easily do
> 200x12, which is faster than the Barton 3200+. Since AMD boards
> make great gaming platforms, your $200 will go a lot farther than
> with Intel. (Note: 200x12 means 200Mhz clock fed to processor, causing
> FSB400 transfer rates to Northbridge. The multiplier applies to the
> clock and not the FSB value. It is easy to get confused...)
>
> http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?submit=property&catalog=343&propertycodevalue=4181,%200,%200,%200,%200,%200,%200,%200&minprice=&maxprice=&mfrcode=1028&DEPA=0&InnerCata=343
>
> Consult cpudatabase.com for overclocking statistics.
>
> If I didn't have to control my compulsion for upgrading, I'd buy one
> of these myself :)
>
> Visit the forums of nforcershq.com for more info on doing
> stuff with Nforce2.
>
> Paul