Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Windows XP and Parallel Port Scanners?

Tags:
  • Scanners
  • Windows XP
Last response: in Windows XP
Share
May 30, 2004 11:25:51 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a printer port.
No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply not looking for
or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner? The scanner does
work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel) to be connected
via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I think it odd that I
can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the "add hardware" under
Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation correctly, or is there a
way to get the scanner fully recognized in XP? ;-Deano

More about : windows parallel port scanners

Anonymous
May 30, 2004 2:45:26 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Windows XP does not support pass-through or daisy-chaining
the printer and scanner.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Deano" <dtwo@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:Xwjuc.76776$tb4.2707012@news20.bellglobal.com...
| I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a
printer port.
| No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
| Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply
not looking for
| or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner?
The scanner does
| work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel) to
be connected
| via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I think
it odd that I
| can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the "add
hardware" under
| Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation correctly,
or is there a
| way to get the scanner fully recognized in XP? ;-Deano
May 30, 2004 3:53:27 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Oh Well!, another loss of functionality in a new windows version!
Too bad, Win98SE would support a scanner, zip drive, and a printer on a
single parallel port.
(If the drivers and printer monitor were compatable.)

"Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message
news:uM3mr0lREHA.3924@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Windows XP does not support pass-through or daisy-chaining
> the printer and scanner.
>
>
> --
> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>
>
> "Deano" <dtwo@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:Xwjuc.76776$tb4.2707012@news20.bellglobal.com...
> | I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a
> printer port.
> | No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
> | Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply
> not looking for
> | or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner?
> The scanner does
> | work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel) to
> be connected
> | via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I think
> it odd that I
> | can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the "add
> hardware" under
> | Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation correctly,
> or is there a
> | way to get the scanner fully recognized in XP? ;-Deano
>
>
Related resources
May 30, 2004 4:16:03 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Just for information.

I have WinXP Home and have my Iomega Zip 100 connected to the parallel
port. I also have my HP DeskJet 970cse connected via the pass thru port on
the Zip drive. Each works fine, never had a problem at all. I also have
added a Netgear router to my system and use a wireless card for my laptop.
The HP DJ970cse is configured so as to allow me to print from the laptop or
directly from the desktop.

Fred

Chuck wrote:

> Oh Well!, another loss of functionality in a new windows version!
> Too bad, Win98SE would support a scanner, zip drive, and a printer on a
> single parallel port.
> (If the drivers and printer monitor were compatable.)
>
> "Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message
> news:uM3mr0lREHA.3924@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Windows XP does not support pass-through or daisy-chaining
> > the printer and scanner.
> >
> >
> > --
> > The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
> >
> >
> > "Deano" <dtwo@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> > news:Xwjuc.76776$tb4.2707012@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > | I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a
> > printer port.
> > | No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
> > | Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply
> > not looking for
> > | or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner?
> > The scanner does
> > | work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel) to
> > be connected
> > | via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I think
> > it odd that I
> > | can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the "add
> > hardware" under
> > | Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation correctly,
> > or is there a
> > | way to get the scanner fully recognized in XP? ;-Deano
> >
> >
Anonymous
May 30, 2004 6:47:39 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Go to Canon's web site and see if they have XP drivers for your scanner.

http://www.usa.canon.com/html/conCprTSIndex.jsp?app=dow...

--
Hope this helps. Let us know.
Wes

In news:Xwjuc.76776$tb4.2707012@news20.bellglobal.com,
Deano <dtwo@sympatico.ca> hunted and pecked:
> I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a printer
> port. No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
> Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply not looking
> for or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner? The
> scanner does work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel)
> to be connected via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I
> think it odd that I can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the
> "add hardware" under Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation
> correctly, or is there a way to get the scanner fully recognized in
> XP? ;-Deano
Anonymous
May 30, 2004 6:53:29 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Oops. Maybe Canon, Canada

http://www.canon.ca/english/index-customersupport.asp



--
Hope this helps. Let us know.
Wes

In news:eumuc.14789$3x.2575@attbi_s54,
Wesley Vogel <123WVogel955@comcast.net> hunted and pecked:
> Go to Canon's web site and see if they have XP drivers for your
> scanner.
>
> http://www.usa.canon.com/html/conCprTSIndex.jsp?app=dow...
>
> --
> Hope this helps. Let us know.
> Wes
>
> In news:Xwjuc.76776$tb4.2707012@news20.bellglobal.com,
> Deano <dtwo@sympatico.ca> hunted and pecked:
>> I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a printer
>> port. No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
>> Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply not looking
>> for or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner? The
>> scanner does work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel)
>> to be connected via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I
>> think it odd that I can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the
>> "add hardware" under Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation
>> correctly, or is there a way to get the scanner fully recognized in
>> XP? ;-Deano
Anonymous
May 30, 2004 10:12:57 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

On Sun, 30 May 2004 07:25:51 -0400, Deano <dtwo@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> I have an older Cannon scanner that connects through a printer port.
> No matter what I do, XP will not recognize it in the
>Camera/Scanners section in Control Panel. Is XP simply not looking for
>or expecting a scanner to be connected in this manner? The scanner does
>work, but it will not allow the printer(also parallel) to be connected
>via the "pass through" connection on the scanner. I think it odd that I
>can't even get scanner drivers to SHOW in the "add hardware" under
>Cameras/Scanners. Am I reading this limitation correctly, or is there a
>way to get the scanner fully recognized in XP? ;-Deano

Don't expect XP to understand anything about older equipment.
I've got an old scanmaker E3 parallel port scanner I use with my
XP pro machine, and it does not show in the cams/scanners
listing. Its driver shows up as an SCSI device (it was
origionally designed to also work with a mac). It needs to be
connected and turned on when the computer is booted (I can turn
it off after boot). I get seven popups showing new hardware , but
I just cancel them as XP gets totally confused if I don't. To
scan, I use IrFanView, which calls up the Microteck software for
the scanning. Just as a test, I connected my Lexmark parallel
port printer to the to the pass through on the scanner cable, and
it prints just fine. If your scanner has NT/2K drivers, you
should be able to make it work. I also use a program called
userport (search google for userport.zip) which allows user level
access to the computer hardware, such as the printer ports. This
might also allow older programs to access the parallel port if
needed.
!