Newest rev of BIOS for ASUS A7N8X-E Deluxe

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

I got 1012, no problems with it!!Bios update are useal for support for
processors with an other core;amd barton,etc;sempron

"Mark G." <cadman_meg@comcast.net> schreef in bericht
news:6ZCdnRwQb8anrq3cRVn-hw@comcast.com...
> When I bought my motherboard a few months back, it had version 1008 of the
> BIOS. I had read on this forum and other places that 1009 was no good at
all
> and in fact that ASUS removed it from their site. Therefore, I am
wondering
> if there are any new anticipated versions now or coming that will be
better
> than what is currently running on my machine? My philosophy is not to try
> and fix what is not yet broken, but if there is a performance increase,
then
> that may be worth it. Any thoughts and/or input? Thanks much.
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

1012 also, but i dont think theres really any major update changes between
1008/1012
--
Almeyda

AMD2500XP @3200XP-11X200-2.21Ghz |
A7N8X-E Deluxe | Corsair TWINX1024 XMS3200XL 5-2-2-2 DualChannel |
HIS Excalibur 9800XT 256mb @459/398 (Omegas 2.5.67 & ATI tool 0.21 No
Artifacts)
1x80GB SATA Seagate 8mg cache | 2x40GB ATA Seagate |
SB AudigyES | ANTEC SuperLanboy 350 Case (350W SmartBlue PS) |
Doom3 @ 1024x768 Ultra High, all visuals on. (Demo1 = 43fps vcard not
o'clocked)



"piet" <twic@casema.nl> wrote in message
news:1-ydnRigerxqxq3cRVnyiA@casema.nl...
>I got 1012, no problems with it!!Bios update are useal for support for
> processors with an other core;amd barton,etc;sempron
>
> "Mark G." <cadman_meg@comcast.net> schreef in bericht
> news:6ZCdnRwQb8anrq3cRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>> When I bought my motherboard a few months back, it had version 1008 of
>> the
>> BIOS. I had read on this forum and other places that 1009 was no good at
> all
>> and in fact that ASUS removed it from their site. Therefore, I am
> wondering
>> if there are any new anticipated versions now or coming that will be
> better
>> than what is currently running on my machine? My philosophy is not to try
>> and fix what is not yet broken, but if there is a performance increase,
> then
>> that may be worth it. Any thoughts and/or input? Thanks much.
>>
>>
>
>