I really find that all the "Director' S Cut" are idiocies. Destroyers of masterpiece.
It is like taking a paint, a masterpiece, like the Mona Lisa of Léonard De Vinci, and to repaint over. And to have for result not
a masterpiece but a waste.
Well it is that which arrived at masterpiece "Blade Runner" of 1982 amongst other things.
All that Under pretext of give pleasure with its director, Ridley Scott, which was surely on the acid when it with destroyed this masteerpiece.
When I saw the original, with the voice-off of Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) all along film, I had really pleasure. And this film
became one of my preferred.
Unfortunately, never I had not thought that there would have been mental patients to destroy this masterpiece Nor either that the "Director'S Cut"
would become a fashion. As what one likes to destroy masterpiece.
And thus I did not think of buying a copy (or several) VHS (the DVD did not exist at this time).
However today it is IMPOSSIBLE to find the Original of Blade Runner on DVD.
In which we hear Harrisson Ford spoken backwards plan during all the film.
And also the end where one sees Rick Deckard and Rachael on the highway motorway and not to finish brutally in the elevator.
Since this time I regard Ridley Scott as an idiot. Insane. An imbecile.
Because it is necessary to be like that to destroy such a pretty masterpiece and to make a turnip of it.
To understand what I want to say, for those which did not see the original of "Blade Runner", well imagine to see "Sin City" (with Mickey Rourke)
without the voice backwards plan of him.
If a day one makes Director' S cut of this film (Sin City), same manner as with Blade Runner, by removing the voice-off, one will destroy this
masterpiece too.
If one wants to destroy a video masterpiece, at least that one is the intelligence to preserve the original and to also sell it.
Why they don't have law against crazy director's?