Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (
More info?)
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:17:09 -0500, P2B <p2b@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>Milleron wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:36:02 -0500, P2B <p2b@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>John McCoy wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am planning to get an Asus P4C800E Deluxe and an SATA drive, I am
>>>>currently running a scsi set up and wondering what the best imaging software
>>>>is?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>I suggest Ghost 9, or Drive Image 7.
>>>
>>>Where I work there have been Ghost vs. Drive Image flame wars for years.
>>>I always preferred the Drive Image user interface, and found the two
>>>products provided similar functionality, but leapfrogged each other with
>>>each new version released.
>>>
>>>Drive Image 7 finally eliminated the last of the annoyances - the need
>>>to boot DOS to back up a system partition (can now be scheduled and run
>>>without shutting down Windows), and the requirement to create DOS boot
>>>disks which were frequently hardware-specific (DI7 can boot from the
>>>product CD and configure networking without user intervention - required
>>>only for system partition restores or after drive failure).
>>>
>>>I guess Drive Image wins the flame wars - Symantec bought Powerquest,
>>>and Ghost 9 is Drive Image 7 with incremental image backup functionality
>>>added. The traditional Ghost user interface is no more...
>>>
>>>P2B
>>
>>
>> Well, yes, you could put it that way. Technically speaking, though,
>> Ghost 9 is a rebadged version of a different, lesser known, former
>> PowerQuest product, V2i Protector Desktop (even uses the old V2i file
>> extension). V2i, in turn, may have been DI with incremental backups.
>> Ron
>
>Interesting. I wasn't aware of V2i Protector Desktop, and assumed
>Symantec developed the incremental backup functionality after the
>acquisition of Powerquest. DI7 also uses the v2i file extension.
Yeah, V2i Protector did incremental backups. PowerQuest didn't seem
to promote it much for consumers, probably because it was originally
aimed at the enterprise level with the Desktop version being an
afterthought. For example, they were never aggressive in getting it
reviewed by the main computer mags. I own both V2i and Ghost 9, and I
can see no difference, at all. I wouldn't have paid good money for
Ghost 9 had I known that it's nothing new. That doesn't mean it's not
a good product. I think it is, but it's not a genuine advance in this
type of software.
Ron