Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (
More info?)
I wonder about a FSB at 1.2 GHz, what does that do to timing
between various parts, how big is the hard drive buffer,
etc? How hot does it get? How much is the video oc'd (and
what kind is it)?
--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
"RJK" <notatospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uMexBLmaEHA.3012@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| It always tickles me, when somone thinks they've achieved
something
| wonderful by running their hardware in excess of
reccommended tolerances.
| The manufacturers don't make reccommendations for fun, a
lot of work goes
| into them.
|
| regards, Richard
|
|
| "Nathan McNulty" <525676@betaweb.com> wrote in message
| news:OJmGo2jaEHA.3716@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
| > Actually, overclocking is a wonderful thing. Why spend
more money one
| > something you can easily get for free and often end up
with an even
| > better product. Right now I am running my computer at
3.9 GHz with a 1.2
| > GHz FSB on an Intel P4 2.6C. Even if I had spend the
extra money (which
| > would have been quite a bit of money), I could not have
gotten the same
| > performance. An Intel 3.4 GHz Extreme Edition could not
compete because
| > the FSB is going to be a lot lower and eventually if you
want to
| > overclock that processor, heat will be an issue. Now for
people who have
| > LN Cooling, that is a whole nother story
| >
| > Nathan McNulty
| >
| > RJK wrote:
| >
| > > ...do you mean that messy area where, for example, it
would really have
| been
| > > best to have spent an extra £10 or so, and bought that
faster processor
| in
| > > the first place ?
| > >
| > > regards, Richard
| > >
| > >
| > > "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com>
wrote in message
| > > news:%23qMvadfaEHA.3476@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| > >
| > >>The laughs on you buddy.
| > >>
| > >>400 mhz RAM "WILL" run at 333 mhz if the motherboard
is set as such. If
| > >
| > > the
| > >
| > >>M/B has a max speed of 333 mhz, the RAM will never run
higher.
| > >>
| > >>Now, regarding overclocking.....?
| > >>
| > >>--
| > >>Regards:
| > >>
| > >>Richard Urban
| > >>
| > >>aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>"Tedd" <ted@notnormal.net> wrote in message
| > >>news:fgiJc.4037$cL1.1712@roc.nntpserver.com...
| > >>
| > >>"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain>
wrote in message
| > >>news:OCmicQeaEHA.1840@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
| > >>
| > >>>In news:uJADSWXaEHA.3352@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl,
| > >>>Kenny S <hotmail@coldmail.com> typed:
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>>I have 2 sticks of memory that are 333mhz and 256 mb
each.
| > >>>>One slot is free, what memory is best to get? A
faster memory
| > >>>
| > >>>(say
| > >>>
| > >>>>400mhz) or one that is 333 Mhz?
| > >>>>I want to add 1 stick of 512 MB to get a total of 1
gig.
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>You want to get memory that matched as closely as
possible to
| > >>>what you already have.
| > >>>
| > >>>Also note that 400MHz memory is not faster than
333MHz memory.
| > >>>Thise numbers are not speeds, but speed *ratings*.
The actual
| > >>>speed is set by the motherboard and all the memory
will run at
| > >>>the same speed.
| > >>>
| > >>>400MHz is memory that has been tested and certified
to run at
| > >>>400MHz, and 333MHz only certified to run at that
speed.
| > >>
| > >>LMAO!
| > >>
| > >>Your reasoning power and logic are rich!
| > >>
| > >>
| > >
| > >
| > >
|
|
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram