Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > Asus > IDE drive problems on P4C800
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

Hi,

Having nothing important on my drives, I moved a 60GB ATA133 and a 160GB
ATA133 drives from an Intel 845GERG2 motherboard to a P4C800.

No wonder windows would not boot (but the windows install on the drives that
I moved from the P4C800 to the intel mobo booted just fine).

So I did a clean winxp install on the master 60GB drive, with the 160GB
drive as slave for storage, only to be disappointed with the performance of
both IDE drives. DMA is enabled on both channels of the controller, for
master and slave. Moreover, I could not benchmark the 60GB drive either with
HDTach or Sandra, boh hang with CPU errors (?!). Benchmarking the slave
160GB drive works fine, but sustained drive speed is 30 MB/s...

I moved the drives from the blue connector to the black connector and aaaah,
performance is mucho better, 60GB is still unbenchmarkable (whoa, a new
word), and the slave drive works like it should, ATA100 at least.

I installed intel's INF file correctly, I have no idea why the drives behave
this way. Any suggestion ?

Lorenzo

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

Did you install the ide driver off the CD?

Homer

"Lorenzo Sandini" <lorenzo.sandiniPOISTA@uku.fi> wrote in message
news:3at11lF6d53uoU1@individual.net...
> Hi,
>
> Having nothing important on my drives, I moved a 60GB ATA133 and a 160GB
> ATA133 drives from an Intel 845GERG2 motherboard to a P4C800.
>
> No wonder windows would not boot (but the windows install on the drives
> that I moved from the P4C800 to the intel mobo booted just fine).
>
> So I did a clean winxp install on the master 60GB drive, with the 160GB
> drive as slave for storage, only to be disappointed with the performance
> of both IDE drives. DMA is enabled on both channels of the controller, for
> master and slave. Moreover, I could not benchmark the 60GB drive either
> with HDTach or Sandra, boh hang with CPU errors (?!). Benchmarking the
> slave 160GB drive works fine, but sustained drive speed is 30 MB/s...
>
> I moved the drives from the blue connector to the black connector and
> aaaah, performance is mucho better, 60GB is still unbenchmarkable (whoa, a
> new word), and the slave drive works like it should, ATA100 at least.
>
> I installed intel's INF file correctly, I have no idea why the drives
> behave this way. Any suggestion ?
>
> Lorenzo
>

Reply to homer

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

In article <3at11lF6d53uoU1@individual.net>, "Lorenzo Sandini"
<lorenzo.sandiniPOISTA@uku.fi> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Having nothing important on my drives, I moved a 60GB ATA133 and a 160GB
> ATA133 drives from an Intel 845GERG2 motherboard to a P4C800.
>
> No wonder windows would not boot (but the windows install on the drives that
> I moved from the P4C800 to the intel mobo booted just fine).
>
> So I did a clean winxp install on the master 60GB drive, with the 160GB
> drive as slave for storage, only to be disappointed with the performance of
> both IDE drives. DMA is enabled on both channels of the controller, for
> master and slave. Moreover, I could not benchmark the 60GB drive either with
> HDTach or Sandra, boh hang with CPU errors (?!). Benchmarking the slave
> 160GB drive works fine, but sustained drive speed is 30 MB/s...
>
> I moved the drives from the blue connector to the black connector and aaaah,
> performance is mucho better, 60GB is still unbenchmarkable (whoa, a new
> word), and the slave drive works like it should, ATA100 at least.
>
> I installed intel's INF file correctly, I have no idea why the drives behave
> this way. Any suggestion ?
>
> Lorenzo

Your BIOS is set incorrectly. When using Enhanced mode, there is only
one "valid" setting for the "Enhanced mode support on" setting.
It should be set to [S-ATA], even if that is counter-intuitive.
There have been reports, that using the other two settings, causes
rates slower than ATA100 to be used for IDE drives. So, follow
the advice in the user manual, in the section "Required IDE
Configuration Settings in BIOS", and use the [S-ATA] setting.

It does sound though, like your 60GB drive is not happy. I
don't know whether the BIOS setting will make it work or
not.

Paul

Reply to Paul

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

 

Thank you for your suggestion, I had set it to [P-ATA], I'll try [S-ATA]
next week-end.

Lorenzo



"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-2903051352180001@192.168.1.178...
> In article <3at11lF6d53uoU1@individual.net>, "Lorenzo Sandini"
> <lorenzo.sandiniPOISTA@uku.fi> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Having nothing important on my drives, I moved a 60GB ATA133 and a 160GB
>> ATA133 drives from an Intel 845GERG2 motherboard to a P4C800.
>>
>> No wonder windows would not boot (but the windows install on the drives
>> that
>> I moved from the P4C800 to the intel mobo booted just fine).
>>
>> So I did a clean winxp install on the master 60GB drive, with the 160GB
>> drive as slave for storage, only to be disappointed with the performance
>> of
>> both IDE drives. DMA is enabled on both channels of the controller, for
>> master and slave. Moreover, I could not benchmark the 60GB drive either
>> with
>> HDTach or Sandra, boh hang with CPU errors (?!). Benchmarking the slave
>> 160GB drive works fine, but sustained drive speed is 30 MB/s...
>>
>> I moved the drives from the blue connector to the black connector and
>> aaaah,
>> performance is mucho better, 60GB is still unbenchmarkable (whoa, a new
>> word), and the slave drive works like it should, ATA100 at least.
>>
>> I installed intel's INF file correctly, I have no idea why the drives
>> behave
>> this way. Any suggestion ?
>>
>> Lorenzo
>
> Your BIOS is set incorrectly. When using Enhanced mode, there is only
> one "valid" setting for the "Enhanced mode support on" setting.
> It should be set to [S-ATA], even if that is counter-intuitive.
> There have been reports, that using the other two settings, causes
> rates slower than ATA100 to be used for IDE drives. So, follow
> the advice in the user manual, in the section "Required IDE
> Configuration Settings in BIOS", and use the [S-ATA] setting.
>
> It does sound though, like your 60GB drive is not happy. I
> don't know whether the BIOS setting will make it work or
> not.
>
> Paul

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > Asus > IDE drive problems on P4C800
Go to:

There are 1123 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them