• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

News

Comcast worker snoozes at customer's house

A Comcast worker was caught sleeping on the job, not once, but twice. The Maironi family in Garden City Michigan had a Comcast worker fix the cable system, but found the worker asleep after one hour. One of the family members took a picture of the worker who was sprawled out on his bed. Read more

Comcast licenses Microsoft TV software

Microsoft has scored a major win for its cable TV software. Cable giant Comcast announced has licensed the firm's Foundation Edition 1.7 for up to five million customers. Read more

Could newly proposed House legislation rewire the Bell System?

A deal that would have enabled US broadband Internet companies to provide cable service on a nationwide scale, broke down in Congress on Friday. Substitute legislation proposed by a key House committee chairman, would change the language to make cable TV providers the key providers of nationwide ISP service, competing with existing cable companies in every single municipality. Read more

Why Cable ISP Capping is the New DRM, and Suck

I, like many people, have been subscribing to Internet connection services since the days of 3600 baud modems. Then, I upgraded to 14.4k, 36.6k, 56k, DSL and now cable. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Windows 7 Versus XP: Which Belongs On Your Netbook?

Windows 7 Versus XP: Which Belongs On Your Netbook?

Windows Vista was never really an option for netbook users, but the release candidate of Windows 7 piqued our interest. Can Microsoft finally retire Windows XP in the netbook space? Even now with RC1 available, the answer seems tied to driver development. Read more

A Lesson In Backup: Taking Care Of Your Data

A Lesson In Backup: Taking Care Of Your Data

If you aren't regularly backing up your data, now's a good time to start. In this piece we cover some of the basic backup strategies, a handful of available tools, and backup performance over USB 2.0 using Samsung's newest Story Station external drive. Read more

Killer Xeno Pro: Do You Really Need A Gaming Network Card?

Killer Xeno Pro: Do You Really Need A Gaming Network Card?

Bigfoot Networks has updated its gaming Network Processing Units to support PCI Express connectivity. The new Killer Xeno Pro has a lot of new features, but can it really deliver higher performance for a gamer? We test the new card in order to find out. Read more

ADVERTORIAL Microsoft BPOS: Taking Action

ADVERTORIAL Microsoft BPOS: Taking Action

Moving to Microsoft Business Productivity Online Suite quickly and smoothly may require the help of a qualified advisor. That's an opportunity for potential BPOS customers and those who want to become BPOS advisors. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > AT&T DSL vs. Comcast Cable

AT&T DSL vs. Comcast Cable

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

I am currently using AT&T dial-up, so everyone out their probably can
understand my desire for high-speed. I have been trying to decide on what
high-speed to go with. Both AT&T DSL and Comcast Cable have the potential
for 3 Mbps download for the package I am looking at. The cable option has
upload potential of 256 vs. DSL 384 kbps. I live in an apartment on a
street full of apartments.

Does anyone currently use either of the above providers and can shed some
light on if one choice is better than the other? Good and bad stories for
either would be very much appreciated? The old argument of DSL vs. Cable
is also welcomed.

Thanks for taking the time to share!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

"Mark Williams" <MWilliams@att.net> wrote in message
news:Dd7Bd.1195744$Gx4.627112@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>I am currently using AT&T dial-up, so everyone out their probably can
> understand my desire for high-speed. I have been trying to decide on what
> high-speed to go with. Both AT&T DSL and Comcast Cable have the
> potential
> for 3 Mbps download for the package I am looking at. The cable option
> has
> upload potential of 256 vs. DSL 384 kbps. I live in an apartment on a
> street full of apartments.
>
> Does anyone currently use either of the above providers and can shed some
> light on if one choice is better than the other? Good and bad stories
> for
> either would be very much appreciated? The old argument of DSL vs. Cable
> is also welcomed.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to share!
>

Cable is usually faster at times but not so much these days as DSL is
offering higher speeds. Keep in mind that cable is nice at times but it is
a shared connection so the more people who have cable access in your area,
the slower the conncection gets at times. Where as DSL is dedicated speed
and not shared with anyone.

Reply to Guitarman

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

Cable is faster.
I have DSL, but Cable is faster.
The price of DSL in my area is cheaper than Cable.
So this is why I have DSL. I know people whose DSL is faster than mine.
The area, and phone lines and a lot of other factors can determine speed.
I don't know anyone with Cable that is slower than DSL.
It might be out there, but not at the lower costs.
Is the upload speed really that important??? Are you going to be uploading
tons of files??? Or will you be surfing and downloading???
Compare the download speeds. [and the costs]
DSL still does share, AND........if you are doing home networking through a
router, you will still actually share bandwith with the other computers.

"GuitarMan" wrote:

> "Mark Williams" <MWilliams@att.net> wrote in message
> news:Dd7Bd.1195744$Gx4.627112@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >I am currently using AT&T dial-up, so everyone out their probably can
> > understand my desire for high-speed. I have been trying to decide on what
> > high-speed to go with. Both AT&T DSL and Comcast Cable have the
> > potential
> > for 3 Mbps download for the package I am looking at. The cable option
> > has
> > upload potential of 256 vs. DSL 384 kbps. I live in an apartment on a
> > street full of apartments.
> >
> > Does anyone currently use either of the above providers and can shed some
> > light on if one choice is better than the other? Good and bad stories
> > for
> > either would be very much appreciated? The old argument of DSL vs. Cable
> > is also welcomed.
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time to share!
> >
>
> Cable is usually faster at times but not so much these days as DSL is
> offering higher speeds. Keep in mind that cable is nice at times but it is
> a shared connection so the more people who have cable access in your area,
> the slower the conncection gets at times. Where as DSL is dedicated speed
> and not shared with anyone.
>
>
>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

Mark Williams wrote:
> I am currently using AT&T dial-up, so everyone out their probably can
> understand my desire for high-speed. I have been trying to decide on what
> high-speed to go with. Both AT&T DSL and Comcast Cable have the potential
> for 3 Mbps download for the package I am looking at. The cable option has
> upload potential of 256 vs. DSL 384 kbps. I live in an apartment on a
> street full of apartments.
>
> Does anyone currently use either of the above providers and can shed some
> light on if one choice is better than the other? Good and bad stories for
> either would be very much appreciated? The old argument of DSL vs. Cable
> is also welcomed.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to share!
>
>
>
>
I used QWEST DSL for about a year until they sold out to MSN. It was
very good compared to dial up. I then switched to Cableone's cable
connection. It was much better than QWEST's DSL. Faster. Horizon
cable service is also very good.

Rick

Reply to Rick

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

All,

DSL shares only if it's going through a Remote Terminal as all who are
connected to the Remote Terminal a.k.a. DSLAM. All users on the DSLAM have
to share the bandwidth being connected to the DSLAM from the Telephone
Central Office. Otherwise it is a direct line from the Telephone Central
Office which would not share.

Nospam

"stonekeyboards" <stonekeyboards@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A363CEDF-C4B7-4911-8379-D82D2CCA6A3D@microsoft.com...
> Cable is faster.
> I have DSL, but Cable is faster.
> The price of DSL in my area is cheaper than Cable.
> So this is why I have DSL. I know people whose DSL is faster than mine.
> The area, and phone lines and a lot of other factors can determine speed.
> I don't know anyone with Cable that is slower than DSL.
> It might be out there, but not at the lower costs.
> Is the upload speed really that important??? Are you going to be
> uploading
> tons of files??? Or will you be surfing and downloading???
> Compare the download speeds. [and the costs]
> DSL still does share, AND........if you are doing home networking through
> a
> router, you will still actually share bandwith with the other computers.
>
> "GuitarMan" wrote:
>
>> "Mark Williams" <MWilliams@att.net> wrote in message
>> news:Dd7Bd.1195744$Gx4.627112@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> >I am currently using AT&T dial-up, so everyone out their probably can
>> > understand my desire for high-speed. I have been trying to decide on
>> > what
>> > high-speed to go with. Both AT&T DSL and Comcast Cable have the
>> > potential
>> > for 3 Mbps download for the package I am looking at. The cable option
>> > has
>> > upload potential of 256 vs. DSL 384 kbps. I live in an apartment on a
>> > street full of apartments.
>> >
>> > Does anyone currently use either of the above providers and can shed
>> > some
>> > light on if one choice is better than the other? Good and bad stories
>> > for
>> > either would be very much appreciated? The old argument of DSL vs.
>> > Cable
>> > is also welcomed.
>> >
>> > Thanks for taking the time to share!
>> >
>>
>> Cable is usually faster at times but not so much these days as DSL is
>> offering higher speeds. Keep in mind that cable is nice at times but it
>> is
>> a shared connection so the more people who have cable access in your
>> area,
>> the slower the conncection gets at times. Where as DSL is dedicated speed
>> and not shared with anyone.
>>
>>
>>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

Has www.wowway.com arrived in your area yet?? cheaper than Comcast


"Mark Williams" <MWilliams@att.net> wrote in message
news:Dd7Bd.1195744$Gx4.627112@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>I am currently using AT&T dial-up, so everyone out their probably can
> understand my desire for high-speed. I have been trying to decide on what
> high-speed to go with. Both AT&T DSL and Comcast Cable have the
> potential
> for 3 Mbps download for the package I am looking at. The cable option
> has
> upload potential of 256 vs. DSL 384 kbps. I live in an apartment on a
> street full of apartments.
>
> Does anyone currently use either of the above providers and can shed some
> light on if one choice is better than the other? Good and bad stories
> for
> either would be very much appreciated? The old argument of DSL vs. Cable
> is also welcomed.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to share!
>
>
>
>

Reply to Tom
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > AT&T DSL vs. Comcast Cable
Go to:

There are 788 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links