Ad
News

OCZ announces new DDR400/600 memory

Published on July 17, 2005

OCZ said it has added the PC-4800 Platinum Elite Edition (EE) to its memory lineup. Read more

Kingston updates performance memory

Published on April 17, 2006

Kingston today announced new version of its HyperX memory family targeted at gamers and performance hungry applications. Read more

OCZ ships 1000 MHz DDR2 memory

Published on May 11, 2005

One day after the official announcement of its GHz DDR2 memory modules, OCZ said that it has begun shipping the devices. Read more

G.Skill Unveils 2,000 MHz Tri-Channel DDR3 Kits

Published on December 03, 2008

G.Skill has announced new enthusiast DDR3 triple-channel memory kits rated at speeds of up to 2,000 MHz Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Graphics Boosted: 790GX's Side-Port Explored

Published on December 09, 2008

AMD's 790GX and 780G support onboard memory to help improve the performance of integrated graphics. Is it worth paying a bit extra or is the feature a mere gimmick? Read more

PCI Express & CrossFire: Scaling Explored

Published on December 08, 2008

Does your aging CrossFire-compatible motherboard have enough PCI Express bandwidth to make a second card worthwhile? We compare every Core 2-based platform in order to find out. Read more

Intel SS4200-E: PC-Based NAS Evaluated

Published on December 05, 2008

Intel's Celeron-based SS4200-E is the company's latest effort to clinch market share in the SOHO storage space. Is it enough to usurp more established incumbents? Read more

Best Video Cards For The Money: Dec '08

Published on December 04, 2008

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. At the end of the day, though, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget, and that’s what we’re going to show you. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » MSI-Microstar » Reported memory timings with MSI K7N2
 

Reported memory timings with MSI K7N2




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Reported memory timings with MSI K7N2
 
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

Hi -
I'm still pretty much a newbie with MB replacement. I just upgraded a
machine using a MSI K7N2 ($75 at Frys) , Athlon 2400+ , and a single stick
of 256MB DDR333 (PC2700). All seems to be running fine and stable.
However, I am wondering if the memory timings are corret. At POST it
reports:

Memory Mode: Single Channel
Clock for DDR: 333


Is the "Single Channel" as its supposed to be. The "Dual Data Rate" of
"DDR" makes me think this might be not right. If its right, thats great -
any short explanation would be appreciated. If its wrong and should be "Du

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

(Sorry - posted too soon by accident)

If its wrong and should be "Double", how do I make it so ? Thanks a lot
for any help.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

On 4/27/2004 11:45 PM Tom Betters brightened our day with:

>(Sorry - posted too soon by accident)
>
> If its wrong and should be "Double", how do I make it so ? Thanks a lot
>for any help.
>
>
>
>
>
Single Channel = 1 stick
Dual Channel = 2 sticks

If you look at the memory slots on the motherboard you'll see two that
are close together (Slots 1 & 2) and a third (Slot 3) that's set off a
little bit and (should be) a different color. Slot 1+3 & Slot 2+3 =
Dual Channel, (just)Slot 1 or 2 or 1+2, or 3 = Single Channel. The
memory bus in dual channel operates at 128 bit rather than 64 bit, while
this sounds impressive on the nForce2 motherboards real world results
are barely noticeable (+3-5%).

Buy another *identical* stick of memory and put it in the correct slot,
when you boot up it will say Dual Channel.

--
"Smiles everyone, Smiles!" - Mr. Roarke

Steve [Inglo]

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

"Tom Betters" <soccer1959@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:smIjc.1491$Rd4.399140@attbi_s51...
> Hi -
> I'm still pretty much a newbie with MB replacement. I just upgraded a
> machine using a MSI K7N2 ($75 at Frys) , Athlon 2400+ , and a single stick
> of 256MB DDR333 (PC2700). All seems to be running fine and stable.
> However, I am wondering if the memory timings are corret. At POST it
> reports:
>
> Memory Mode: Single Channel
> Clock for DDR: 333
>
>
> Is the "Single Channel" as its supposed to be. The "Dual Data Rate" of
> "DDR" makes me think this might be not right. If its right, thats great -
> any short explanation would be appreciated. If its wrong and should be
"Du
>
>
Tom,
Yes, it is right. This MB can use "dual channel mode " for faster
memory access if you put two sticks (same size) into a Green and Purple
slot.
As you only have one stick, then it just runs in single channel mode which
is fine.

Dave

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

Thank you. Since this computer is not for any high end use - just internet
and office type applications - I think 256MB is all I need (which I have
with the one stick). I am assuming I would not see any greatly noticeable
speed increase for this type of usage. Is that a good assumption, or
should I spend the $50 for a second 256MB stick ? Thanks a lot for the
help.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

A good indicator is whether, as you are working, is there a lot of disk
activity right after you execute a command or switch applications. The disk
activity at this point is Windows swapping data into/out of the pagefile.
By adding more RAM, the disk activity should go away - making that part
much, much faster.

But, if you never have this pagefile disk activity, adding more RAM won't
make any difference.
"Tom Betters" <soccer1959@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:AaSjc.38424$cF6.1690428@attbi_s04...
> Thank you. Since this computer is not for any high end use - just
> internet
> and office type applications - I think 256MB is all I need (which I have
> with the one stick). I am assuming I would not see any greatly
> noticeable
> speed increase for this type of usage. Is that a good assumption, or
> should I spend the $50 for a second 256MB stick ? Thanks a lot for the
> help.
>
>


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » MSI-Microstar » Reported memory timings with MSI K7N2

Go to:
 

Google Ads