Ad
News

Nanya to allocate up to 50 percent of capacity to DDR2

Published on January 27, 2005

Nanya Technology plans to allocate up to 50% of its capacity for DDR2 production by the end of the second quarter, according to Pei-lin Pai, company spokesperson. Read more

AMD eyes chip memory expansion

Published on January 20, 2006

Advanced Micro Devices is exploring new types of onboard memory for its chips as a way to bump performance and squeeze more out of its manufacturing plants. Read more

Samsung plans to reduce DDR2 capacity

Published on December 29, 2005

Samsung Electronics plans to further slash its DDR2 capacity and instead allocate more capacity for NAND flash production, according to industry sources. Read more

ECS and NVIDIA Join AMD Phenomena

Published on January 13, 2008

The MCP78M-A from ECS proves that NVIDIA hasn't given up the AMD market, regardless of competitive forces. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: Jan. '09

Published on January 07, 2009

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget, and that’s what we’re going to show you. Read more

Scorpio Blue: Big Notebook HDDs Go Mainstream

Published on January 06, 2009

While two other 500 GB mobile hard drives have been available for a while, WD is the first to release this capacity in a model using the standard 9.5 mm height with two platters. Read more

Value In SLI? GTX 260 Core 216 Vs. GTX 280

Published on January 05, 2009

We recently built a $2,500 gaming system with three GTX 260 Core 216 graphics cards, noting that these were less expensive than two GTX 280s. In the performance-value game, is 3-way SLI in the cards? Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on January 01, 2009

We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » MSI-Microstar » How does K7N2G allocate video RAM for onboard GPU?
 

How does K7N2G allocate video RAM for onboard GPU?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : How does K7N2G allocate video RAM for onboard GPU?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

I am looking to optimize my RAM setup on this board. Which slot will the board pull from for video
memory? Is there a way to install 2x512MB chips and 1x128 to dedicate for video. The goal here would
be to have dual-channel enabled in whatever setup I use.

Thanks

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

Great idea, but no. It won't work.

The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.

Also, the built in video seems limited. I can't 1600 x 1200 at 32 bit
even with 128MB dedeicated to video memory.

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:24:35 -0500, willy <someone@outthere.net>
wrote:

>I am looking to optimize my RAM setup on this board. Which slot will the board pull from for video
>memory? Is there a way to install 2x512MB chips and 1x128 to dedicate for video. The goal here would
>be to have dual-channel enabled in whatever setup I use.
>
>Thanks

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
news:r30lu0tvil17kbettpm19fg0adfgh1g1n7@4ax.com:

> Great idea, but no. It won't work.
>
> The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.
>

Untrue. Slots 1&2 make up one channel and slot 3 the second. As long as
you keep both channels balanced the board will function in dual channel
mode. For instance, my setup is as follows: slot1=512MB, slot2=512MB,
slot3=1GB. Since both channels are balanced, with 1GB apiece, I can, and
do, run in dual channel mode (not that it makes that much difference on an
AMD based system)

<snip>




--
C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
...\RUN\DOS\RUN

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:42:26 GMT, "G.M." <bitbucket@cox.net> wrote:

>Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
>news:r30lu0tvil17kbettpm19fg0adfgh1g1n7@4ax.com:
>
>> Great idea, but no. It won't work.
>>
>> The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.
>>
>
>Untrue. Slots 1&2 make up one channel and slot 3 the second. As long as
>you keep both channels balanced the board will function in dual channel
>mode. For instance, my setup is as follows: slot1=512MB, slot2=512MB,
>slot3=1GB. Since both channels are balanced, with 1GB apiece, I can, and
>do, run in dual channel mode (not that it makes that much difference on an
>AMD based system)
>
><snip>

Hmm. My neo2 Plat will run 2-PNY DDR-433 512mb sticks (slots 1&2) but
when I put in the 3rd, (in slot 3, green) it locks. Sooo, if I buy a
fourth...I can use all four and have them recognized properly?

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

BillyBob <um..ok..yeah@officespace.com> wrote in
news:o2hlu0drihm2oii2m0jrd50m28rqsdlltm@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:42:26 GMT, "G.M." <bitbucket@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
>>news:r30lu0tvil17kbettpm19fg0adfgh1g1n7@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Great idea, but no. It won't work.
>>>
>>> The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.
>>>
>>
>>Untrue. Slots 1&2 make up one channel and slot 3 the second. As long
>>as you keep both channels balanced the board will function in dual
>>channel mode. For instance, my setup is as follows: slot1=512MB,
>>slot2=512MB, slot3=1GB. Since both channels are balanced, with 1GB
>>apiece, I can, and do, run in dual channel mode (not that it makes
>>that much difference on an AMD based system)
>>
>><snip>
>
> Hmm. My neo2 Plat will run 2-PNY DDR-433 512mb sticks (slots 1&2) but
> when I put in the 3rd, (in slot 3, green) it locks. Sooo, if I buy a
> fourth...I can use all four and have them recognized properly?

Don't know about the Neo, mine are all K7N2/K7N2G with 3 slots.

--
C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
...\RUN\DOS\RUN

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

How did you check that? From my understanding Dual Channel was a
special mode that existed only if Slot 1 and Slot 2 had paired memory
in them. It is kind of like striping a pair of Hard Drives for better
performance.

The third DIMM can only be accessed at it's normal bandwidth and the
memory controler wasn't supposed to be smart enough just address that
RAM more slowly.

Did you run any test to prove this? And how do you determine what
memory block is accessed?

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:42:26 GMT, "G.M." <bitbucket@cox.net> wrote:

>Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
>news:r30lu0tvil17kbettpm19fg0adfgh1g1n7@4ax.com:
>
>> Great idea, but no. It won't work.
>>
>> The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.
>>
>
>Untrue. Slots 1&2 make up one channel and slot 3 the second. As long as
>you keep both channels balanced the board will function in dual channel
>mode. For instance, my setup is as follows: slot1=512MB, slot2=512MB,
>slot3=1GB. Since both channels are balanced, with 1GB apiece, I can, and
>do, run in dual channel mode (not that it makes that much difference on an
>AMD based system)
>
><snip>

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

RTFM....

"Phueque" <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in message
news:4bbqu0hoe8b1bmrcpep7cfajpst8tfsdj4@4ax.com...
> How did you check that? From my understanding Dual Channel was a
> special mode that existed only if Slot 1 and Slot 2 had paired memory
> in them. It is kind of like striping a pair of Hard Drives for better
> performance.
>
> The third DIMM can only be accessed at it's normal bandwidth and the
> memory controler wasn't supposed to be smart enough just address that
> RAM more slowly.
>
> Did you run any test to prove this? And how do you determine what
> memory block is accessed?
>
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:42:26 GMT, "G.M." <bitbucket@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
>>news:r30lu0tvil17kbettpm19fg0adfgh1g1n7@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Great idea, but no. It won't work.
>>>
>>> The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.
>>>
>>
>>Untrue. Slots 1&2 make up one channel and slot 3 the second. As long as
>>you keep both channels balanced the board will function in dual channel
>>mode. For instance, my setup is as follows: slot1=512MB, slot2=512MB,
>>slot3=1GB. Since both channels are balanced, with 1GB apiece, I can, and
>>do, run in dual channel mode (not that it makes that much difference on an
>>AMD based system)
>>
>><snip>
>

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.msi-microstar (More info?)

 

Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
news:4bbqu0hoe8b1bmrcpep7cfajpst8tfsdj4@4ax.com:

> How did you check that? From my understanding Dual Channel was a
> special mode that existed only if Slot 1 and Slot 2 had paired memory
> in them. It is kind of like striping a pair of Hard Drives for better
> performance.

BIOS reports "High Performance Dual Channel Mode" during boot.


> The third DIMM can only be accessed at it's normal bandwidth and the
> memory controler wasn't supposed to be smart enough just address that
> RAM more slowly.

Slots 1 & 2 are on channel 1 while slot 3 is on channel 2. If you only
populate slots 1 & 2 (or only slot 3) then you are only using one
channel. If the channels are unbalanced (eg. channel 1 = 128MB & channel
2 = 256MB) the memory controller will only operate in single channel
mode. If, however, you add an additional 128MB to channel 1 in the above
configuration you now have balanced both channels (both have 256MB) and
the memory controller can operate in dual channel mode, potentially
doubling memory bandwidth. On AMD based systems it only makes a
difference if you are using the built in video controller as
Athlon/Duron/Sempron/... are not nearly as bandwidth starved as Intel
processors.


> Did you run any test to prove this?

SANDRA shows about 5-8% performance gain on my systems running dual
channel vs single channel.


>And how do you determine what memory block is accessed?

Huh?


> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:42:26 GMT, "G.M." <bitbucket@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>Phueque <Phueque@evilwork.com> wrote in
>>news:r30lu0tvil17kbettpm19fg0adfgh1g1n7@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Great idea, but no. It won't work.
>>>
>>> The nForce2 MB drops dual channel when the third dimm is installed.
>>>
>>
>>Untrue. Slots 1&2 make up one channel and slot 3 the second. As long
>>as you keep both channels balanced the board will function in dual
>>channel mode. For instance, my setup is as follows: slot1=512MB,
>>slot2=512MB, slot3=1GB. Since both channels are balanced, with 1GB
>>apiece, I can, and do, run in dual channel mode (not that it makes
>>that much difference on an AMD based system)
>>
>><snip>
>



--
C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
...\RUN\DOS\RUN


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » MSI-Microstar » How does K7N2G allocate video RAM for onboard GPU?

Go to:
 

Google Ads