Monitor resolution

Forum Windows XP : Windows XP General Discussion - Monitor resolution

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

Got a new monitor that recommends resolution at 1280x1024. Maybe my eyes are
worse than I thought but that is just way too difficult to read! Actually my
eyes aren't that bad. I prefer the resolution at 1024x768 and believe it or
not 800x600 is not that bad either. Please explain why they recommend
resolution that high. I know by defintion higher resolution is better but if
everything becomes that small that it's difficult to read then it seems to
defeat the purpose. Thanks.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

LCD or CRT display?

No real issue with a CRT.

An LCD will have a unique pixel or dot for each number in the resolution,
that is at 1280 x 1024 it has 1280 pixels across each of the 1024 lines down.

A lower resolution means that the image is 'merged' or 'blurred' across more
than one pixel and will give an image of less 'sharpness' than is possible at
the higher resolution.

"ATCStephen" wrote:

> Got a new monitor that recommends resolution at 1280x1024. Maybe my eyes are
> worse than I thought but that is just way too difficult to read! Actually my
> eyes aren't that bad. I prefer the resolution at 1024x768 and believe it or
> not 800x600 is not that bad either. Please explain why they recommend
> resolution that high. I know by defintion higher resolution is better but if
> everything becomes that small that it's difficult to read then it seems to
> defeat the purpose. Thanks.

Reply to bar

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

 

You can set a high resolution and then use the display
properties to set larger text and icon sizes that you can
read. But you'll still have the resolution to see pictures.
As Bar said, is it a CRT or LCD?


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"ATCStephen" <ATCStephen@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
news:B47E66C4-D29F-4EDF-AE35-63A64F55EE0C@microsoft.com...
| Got a new monitor that recommends resolution at 1280x1024.
Maybe my eyes are
| worse than I thought but that is just way too difficult to
read! Actually my
| eyes aren't that bad. I prefer the resolution at 1024x768
and believe it or
| not 800x600 is not that bad either. Please explain why
they recommend
| resolution that high. I know by defintion higher
resolution is better but if
| everything becomes that small that it's difficult to read
then it seems to
| defeat the purpose. Thanks.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Monitor resolution
Go to:

There are 891 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them