How to hide available games in mame

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Hi,

I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
directories).
I guess this question has been asked before, I didn't find any answer yet.
Thanks for your help.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

> I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
> directories).

1st of all...you're talking about MAME32, not MAME.
2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"Roman Scherzer" <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> a écrit dans le message de
news:d1lskc$r8k$04$1@news.t-online.com...
> > I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
> > directories).
>
> 1st of all...you're talking about MAME32, not MAME.
> 2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
> 3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.

Merci Romain
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"Roman Scherzer" <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> a écrit dans le message de
news:d1lskc$r8k$04$1@news.t-online.com...
> > I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
> > directories).
>
> 1st of all...you're talking about MAME32, not MAME.
> 2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
> 3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.

1 My ISP doesn't offer me any newsgroup that contains 'mame32' occurrence.
2 I'm very surprised mame32 doesn't allow to filter available.
3 Thank you for your help.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

gulian's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged through his body
were:
> "Roman Scherzer" <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> a écrit dans le message de
> news:d1lskc$r8k$04$1@news.t-online.com...
>> > I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
>> > directories).
>> 1st of all...you're talking about MAME32, not MAME.
>> 2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
>> 3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.
> 1 My ISP doesn't offer me any newsgroup that contains 'mame32' occurrence.
> 2 I'm very surprised mame32 doesn't allow to filter available.
> 3 Thank you for your help.

1 Thats because there isnt a newsgroup specifically for MAME32. MAME32 is
a offshoot of MAME that adds a GUI.
2 Not many people have wanted such a thing
3 Thats what we're here for
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in news:d1lskc$r8k
$04$1@news.t-online.com:

> 3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.
>

4th of all some spyware programs such as Spyware Doctor and Acronis Privacy
Suite Detect Clrmamepro as Spyware\Trojan.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in news:d1lskc$r8k
$04$1@news.t-online.com:

> 2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
>

But you should be able to....
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On 2005-03-21, AWS <no@no.no> wrote:
> But you should be able to....

Why?

OG.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

> 4th of all some spyware programs such as Spyware Doctor and Acronis Privacy
> Suite Detect Clrmamepro as Spyware\Trojan.

Bahaha...you smoked the weed that killed Elvis.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"AWS" <no@no.no> a écrit dans le message de news:423f3de0$0$27394$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in news:d1lskc$r8k
> $04$1@news.t-online.com:
>
> > 2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
> >
>
> But you should be able to....

You mean a personal compiled version of the mame for windows 32bits?
I wouldn't have started this thread if I began to learn how to do this
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"Olivier Galibert" <galibert@pobox.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:slrnd3uit0.mkl.galibert@m23.limsi.fr...
> On 2005-03-21, AWS <no@no.no> wrote:
> > But you should be able to....
>
> Why?
>
> OG.

Tu voulais pas écrire "how" ?
Afficher uniquement les roms non disponibles dans Mame32, savoir celles qui te manquent. Dans
Mame32 on ne peut que cacher celles que l'on ne possède pas.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in news:d1nfb1$fdo
$01$1@news.t-online.com:

> Bahaha...you smoked the weed that killed Elvis.
>
>

You check it see if i am wrong.....
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> wrote in
news:slrnd3uit0.mkl.galibert@m23.limsi.fr:

> Why?
>

Why not?
Why have filters at all then??
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in news:d1nfb1$fdo
$01$1@news.t-online.com:

> Bahaha...you smoked the weed that killed Elvis.

Do you want to see screenshots that prove it?
Why did you did you include a Trojan in it anyway?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

AWS wrote on 21. March 2005:
>
>> most important, everyone doesn't
>> care about them since only a few people know these apps by contrast
>> with spybot & adaware.
>>
>
> I like to know if there are possible trojans on my machine so there goes
> your everyone doesn't care theory.
> Just because Spybot and Adware don't detect it doesn't mean it doesn't
> contain the threats. Spybot and AdAware may not work properly... A trojan
> may have been specifically coded not to show up in their scans.

Yup. You cannot clean a compromized system to get it trustworthy
again. If you are infected --> format C:.

If you don't believe me, believe Microsoft:

<http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/columns/secmgmt/sm0504.mspx>

> By Contrast More people know MS Windows XP too, it by default has built
> in spyware, Spybot and Adaware doesn't detect \ can't remove either...

That's "tolerated" spyware. Either people tolerate it, or just don't know
about it.
--
By(e) Andreas
Old school arcade classics at http://www.tombstones.org.uk/~ankman/
Linux without installation? http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html
OE user? Ease the pain and try the better newsreader http://xnews.newsguy.com/
Registered as user #289125 with the Linux Counter http://counter.li.org/
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

gulian wrote:
> "Roman Scherzer" <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> a écrit dans le message de
> news:d1lskc$r8k$04$1@news.t-online.com...
>
>>>I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
>>>directories).
>>
>>1st of all...you're talking about MAME32, not MAME.
>>2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
>>3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.
>
>
> 1 My ISP doesn't offer me any newsgroup that contains 'mame32' occurrence.
> 2 I'm very surprised mame32 doesn't allow to filter available.
> 3 Thank you for your help.
>
>

1. Though you might look hard
2. No "Unavailables" shown.
3. MAME doesn't do that

<BUH-DUM>

--
Thnik about it!
Dead_Dad
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

AWS wrote:
> Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in news:d1nfb1$fdo
> $01$1@news.t-online.com:
>
>
>>Bahaha...you smoked the weed that killed Elvis.
>
>
> Do you want to see screenshots that prove it?
> Why did you did you include a Trojan in it anyway?

Hey! Roman has to make money /somehow/. <GBEG>

--
Thnik about it!
Dead_Dad
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"Sune Salminen" <salminen@monkeydoktor.dk> a écrit dans le message de
news:423f655a$0$78287$157c6196@dreader1.cybercity.dk...
> AWS wrote:
> > Roman Scherzer <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> wrote in
> > news:d1nfb1$fdo $01$1@news.t-online.com:
> >
> >> Bahaha...you smoked the weed that killed Elvis.
> >
> > Do you want to see screenshots that prove it?
> > Why did you did you include a Trojan in it anyway?
>
> I think if there was any kind of malicious code in ClrMAMEPro you
> wouldn't be the only one on the internet talking about it.
>
> Surely you didn't download it from Romans site. Maybe it was infected by
> something else that is on your PC?
>
> -Sune
>

He only wrote clrmamepro is on the detected list not that it contains malicious code.
If he tells it why don't you just think he uses one of these anti spyware and tested it.
most important, everyone doesn't care about them since only a few people know these apps by
contrast with spybot & adaware.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"AWS" <no@no.no> a écrit dans le message de news:423f5d73$0$82746$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> wrote in
> news:slrnd3uit0.mkl.galibert@m23.limsi.fr:
>
> > Why?
> >
>
> Why not?
> Why have filters at all then??

what were you thinking about when you wrote we should be able to?
Is it that you would like this feature too or an advice to add by your own the option and the
checkbox ?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"gulian" <personne@free.fr> wrote in
news:423f72ce$0$22443$626a14ce@news.free.fr:

> He only wrote clrmamepro is on the detected list not that it contains
> malicious code.

Yet if you actually did run it you wouldnt be able to "....... show them
in ClrMamePro." as it would delete it by default.

> If he tells it why don't you just think he uses one of
> these anti spyware and tested it.

They probably don't have any idea where to get it from. Google searching
is just to hard for them to figure out.

> most important, everyone doesn't
> care about them since only a few people know these apps by contrast
> with spybot & adaware.
>

I like to know if there are possible trojans on my machine so there goes
your everyone doesn't care theory.
Just because Spybot and Adware don't detect it doesn't mean it doesn't
contain the threats. Spybot and AdAware may not work properly... A trojan
may have been specifically coded not to show up in their scans.

By Contrast More people know MS Windows XP too, it by default has built
in spyware, Spybot and Adaware doesn't detect \ can't remove either...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

AWS's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged through his body were:
> Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> wrote in
> news:slrnd3uit0.mkl.galibert@m23.limsi.fr:
>> Why?
> Why not?
> Why have filters at all then??

Its something not commonly used so it'd be just more work for the MAMEdevs
to do without any need (OG is a MAMEdev)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"AWS" <no@no.no> a écrit dans le message de news:423f858f$0$29510$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> "gulian" <personne@free.fr> wrote in
> news:423f72ce$0$22443$626a14ce@news.free.fr:
>
> > He only wrote clrmamepro is on the detected list not that it contains
> > malicious code.
>
> Yet if you actually did run it you wouldnt be able to "....... show them
> in ClrMamePro." as it would delete it by default.
>
> > If he tells it why don't you just think he uses one of
> > these anti spyware and tested it.
>
> They probably don't have any idea where to get it from. Google searching
> is just to hard for them to figure out.
>
> > most important, everyone doesn't
> > care about them since only a few people know these apps by contrast
> > with spybot & adaware.
> >
>
> I like to know if there are possible trojans on my machine so there goes
> your everyone doesn't care theory.
> Just because Spybot and Adware don't detect it doesn't mean it doesn't
> contain the threats. Spybot and AdAware may not work properly... A trojan
> may have been specifically coded not to show up in their scans.
>
> By Contrast More people know MS Windows XP too, it by default has built
> in spyware, Spybot and Adaware doesn't detect \ can't remove either...
still looking for removing msn and xerox folders from program files ?

Did you identify yet the precise spying activity from clrmamepro ?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

"gulian" <personne@free.fr> a écrit dans le message de
news:423edb35$0$14231$626a14ce@news.free.fr...
>
> "Roman Scherzer" <romanN0Sp4Mscherzer@t-online.de> a écrit dans le message de
> news:d1lskc$r8k$04$1@news.t-online.com...
> > > I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the
chosen
> > > directories).
> >
> > 1st of all...you're talking about MAME32, not MAME.
> > 2nd of all...You can't show unavailable ones in MAME32/MAME.
> > 3rd of all...You can show them in ClrMamePro.
>
> Merci Romain
>
>
So you're the Author...
Great work. I like this useful utility. I'm discovering it.
 

Mike

Splendid
Apr 1, 2004
3,865
0
22,780
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:32:46 +0100, gulian wrote:

> I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
> directories).

Actually.... the reason there is no "unavailable" folder in MAME32 is
because it's considered a lamer magnet, ie. it supports PokeRom attitudes
where people can see exactly which ROMs they're still missing.
I'm not saying I necessarily agree with that point of view, but it's what
I've heard.

Anyway, if you can figure out how to compile MAME32 for yourself then you
can edit layout.c and add a "#define LAMER". This used to work, not sure if
it still does.

Hope this helps...
Mike
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Mike's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged through his body
were:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:32:46 +0100, gulian wrote:
>> I would like to display in MAME only the unavailables (the games I don't have in the chosen
>> directories).
> Actually.... the reason there is no "unavailable" folder in MAME32 is
> because it's considered a lamer magnet, ie. it supports PokeRom attitudes
> where people can see exactly which ROMs they're still missing.
> I'm not saying I necessarily agree with that point of view, but it's what
> I've heard.
> Anyway, if you can figure out how to compile MAME32 for yourself then
> you can edit layout.c and add a "#define LAMER". This used to work, not
> sure if it still does.

If you really want to see unavailable ones, just do a scan.