Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (
More info?)
"Matt Gibson" <mattg@blueedgetech.ca> wrote in message
news:e2g21nKRFHA.688@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Yes, me being one of them.
>
> The Maxtor Maxline series is designed to be more reliable (higher MTBF)
than
> the other brands.
>
> Note: There may be other models from the other manufacturers that offer a
> similar MTBF, but I'm not aware of it.
>
> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>
> "izzy" <123@23.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:ezGEfYKRFHA.4028@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Matt Gibson" <mattg@blueedgetech.ca> wrote in message
> > news:O91waFJRFHA.1476@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> Most realiable?
> >>
> >> Maxtor Maxline.
> >>
> >> Matt Gibson - GSEC
> >>
> >> "Music Lover" <music@my-heart.org> wrote in message
> >> news:epiMXYIRFHA.1096@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For IDE Hard Disk, what brand do you think is the most reliable?
> >
> > Maxtor, Seagate, Western Digital are 3 common brands. I don't think
one
> > is more reliable than the other.
> > Although other people would argue that statement.
> >
> > EviL.
HD manufacturers' reliability data are mostly unreliable, result from
accelerated test projections, and are not based on real-world test
conditions. The fact is that if hard drives were tested to failure in real
time, using real-world test conditions, by the time results were available
the drives in question would be hopelessly obsolete. MTBF is a very slippery
slope, and is commonly misused as a *predictor* of the life of a given
product. It has a brother--MTTF--(Mean Time To Failure) which would probably
be a better indicator, but I guess MTBF is more sexy for some reason.