Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
Thank you
Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
Thank you
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>Thank you
My new Canon i960 has a "silent' feature - but it's so quiet already,
I can't see how it could get any quieter.
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>Thank you
My new Canon i960 has a "silent' feature - but it's so quiet already,
I can't see how it could get any quieter.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>Thank you
>
One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of a
Canon "I" series.....
As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener, the
Canon is virtually silent, LOL
They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
working or not while its printing.
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>Thank you
>
One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of a
Canon "I" series.....
As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener, the
Canon is virtually silent, LOL
They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
working or not while its printing.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
pls wrote:
> Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
> Thank you
I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by definition an
inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving parts, the printhead
moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the paper, the heads parking at
the end of the print, priming, etc. Some printers are quieter than others,
but there is no such thing as a truly silent inkjet. If you want a virtually
silent (and even they aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a
laser.
pls wrote:
> Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
> Thank you
I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by definition an
inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving parts, the printhead
moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the paper, the heads parking at
the end of the print, priming, etc. Some printers are quieter than others,
but there is no such thing as a truly silent inkjet. If you want a virtually
silent (and even they aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a
laser.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:fQeIc.1142$pP1.194@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by definition an
> inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving parts, the printhead
> moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the paper, the heads parking at
> the end of the print, priming, etc. Some printers are quieter than others,
> but there is no such thing as a truly silent inkjet. If you want a
virtually
> silent (and even they aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a
> laser.
>
Sorry for my bad english, I mean 'silent'.
However I know that all inkjet printers aren't quiet or silent but some
model printer could be more quiet than onother model printer,
I would be to know which model inkjet printers are more silent, thanks.
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:fQeIc.1142$pP1.194@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by definition an
> inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving parts, the printhead
> moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the paper, the heads parking at
> the end of the print, priming, etc. Some printers are quieter than others,
> but there is no such thing as a truly silent inkjet. If you want a
virtually
> silent (and even they aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a
> laser.
>
Sorry for my bad english, I mean 'silent'.
However I know that all inkjet printers aren't quiet or silent but some
model printer could be more quiet than onother model printer,
I would be to know which model inkjet printers are more silent, thanks.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
pls wrote:
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:fQeIc.1142$pP1.194@fe48.usenetserver.com...
>> I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by
>> definition an inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving
>> parts, the printhead moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the
>> paper, the heads parking at the end of the print, priming, etc. Some
>> printers are quieter than others, but there is no such thing as a
>> truly silent inkjet. If you want a virtually silent (and even they
>> aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a laser.
>>
>
> Sorry for my bad english, I mean 'silent'.
> However I know that all inkjet printers aren't quiet or silent but
> some model printer could be more quiet than onother model printer,
> I would be to know which model inkjet printers are more silent,
> thanks.
I'm afraid that's purely subjective. What I might term 'quiet' you might
find unbearable to live with. Personally, I'd rather have a noisy printer
that prints perfectly than a 'silent' one that printed rubbish and I'm sure
there are many here who would agree with me. Many would place quality over
quietness.
The only way is to go to a store and ask to try a few printers. There's
no-one here who can advise you.
pls wrote:
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:fQeIc.1142$pP1.194@fe48.usenetserver.com...
>> I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by
>> definition an inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving
>> parts, the printhead moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the
>> paper, the heads parking at the end of the print, priming, etc. Some
>> printers are quieter than others, but there is no such thing as a
>> truly silent inkjet. If you want a virtually silent (and even they
>> aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a laser.
>>
>
> Sorry for my bad english, I mean 'silent'.
> However I know that all inkjet printers aren't quiet or silent but
> some model printer could be more quiet than onother model printer,
> I would be to know which model inkjet printers are more silent,
> thanks.
I'm afraid that's purely subjective. What I might term 'quiet' you might
find unbearable to live with. Personally, I'd rather have a noisy printer
that prints perfectly than a 'silent' one that printed rubbish and I'm sure
there are many here who would agree with me. Many would place quality over
quietness.
The only way is to go to a store and ask to try a few printers. There's
no-one here who can advise you.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:z_gIc.1149$pP1.317@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> The only way is to go to a store and ask to try a few printers. There's
> no-one here who can advise you.
>
But someone answered me
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:z_gIc.1149$pP1.317@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> The only way is to go to a store and ask to try a few printers. There's
> no-one here who can advise you.
>
But someone answered me
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:20:25 -0400, beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>
>>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>>Thank you
>>
>
>
>One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of a
>Canon "I" series.....
>
>As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener, the
>Canon is virtually silent, LOL
>
>They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
>would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
>working or not while its printing.
>
>
Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
--
Hecate
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:20:25 -0400, beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>
>>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>>Thank you
>>
>
>
>One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of a
>Canon "I" series.....
>
>As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener, the
>Canon is virtually silent, LOL
>
>They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
>would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
>working or not while its printing.
>
>
Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
--
Hecate
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
>Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
>
> --
>
>Hecate
>Hecate@newsguy.com
>veni, vidi, reliqui
Are you joking? I see a smiley so I guess so..
>Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
>
> --
>
>Hecate
>Hecate@newsguy.com
>veni, vidi, reliqui
Are you joking? I see a smiley so I guess so..
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>
>>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>>Thank you
>>
>
>
>One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of a
>Canon "I" series.....
>
>As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener, the
>Canon is virtually silent, LOL
>
>They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
>would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
>working or not while its printing.
>
>
I agree. I have an i9900. It makes some noise if it is preparing
itself to print but once it starts printing you can hardly hear the
printhead moving back and forth. Much quieter than any laser printer
I've had. And I've had quite a few. And it's certainly quieter than
any Epson I've had also.
beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>
>>Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good price?
>>Thank you
>>
>
>
>One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of a
>Canon "I" series.....
>
>As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener, the
>Canon is virtually silent, LOL
>
>They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
>would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
>working or not while its printing.
>
>
I agree. I have an i9900. It makes some noise if it is preparing
itself to print but once it starts printing you can hardly hear the
printhead moving back and forth. Much quieter than any laser printer
I've had. And I've had quite a few. And it's certainly quieter than
any Epson I've had also.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
pls wrote:
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:fQeIc.1142$pP1.194@fe48.usenetserver.com...
>
>>I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by definition an
>>inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving parts, the printhead
>>moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the paper, the heads parking at
>>the end of the print, priming, etc. Some printers are quieter than others,
>>but there is no such thing as a truly silent inkjet. If you want a
>
> virtually
>
>>silent (and even they aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a
>>laser.
>>
>
>
> Sorry for my bad english, I mean 'silent'.
> However I know that all inkjet printers aren't quiet or silent but some
> model printer could be more quiet than onother model printer,
> I would be to know which model inkjet printers are more silent, thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
The Canon i9950 is very quiet, and I assume the i965 would be similar.
--
Ben Thomas
Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
pls wrote:
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:fQeIc.1142$pP1.194@fe48.usenetserver.com...
>
>>I assume by "silentness" you mean 'silent'? I Sorry, but by definition an
>>inkjet cannot be silent - there are too many moving parts, the printhead
>>moving across the bar, the rollers drawing the paper, the heads parking at
>>the end of the print, priming, etc. Some printers are quieter than others,
>>but there is no such thing as a truly silent inkjet. If you want a
>
> virtually
>
>>silent (and even they aren't totally quiet) printer, your only choice is a
>>laser.
>>
>
>
> Sorry for my bad english, I mean 'silent'.
> However I know that all inkjet printers aren't quiet or silent but some
> model printer could be more quiet than onother model printer,
> I would be to know which model inkjet printers are more silent, thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
The Canon i9950 is very quiet, and I assume the i965 would be similar.
--
Ben Thomas
Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
Rob wrote:
> beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good
>>> price? Thank you
>>>
>>
>>
>> One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of
>> a Canon "I" series.....
>>
>> As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener,
>> the Canon is virtually silent, LOL
>>
>> They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
>> would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
>> working or not while its printing.
>>
>>
>
> I agree. I have an i9900. It makes some noise if it is preparing
> itself to print but once it starts printing you can hardly hear the
> printhead moving back and forth. Much quieter than any laser printer
> I've had. And I've had quite a few. And it's certainly quieter than
> any Epson I've had also.
I'm with you there (I have the same unit).
Rob wrote:
> beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:58:56 GMT, "pls" <ciro72@libero.it> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi someone can tell me a good silentness inkjet printer at good
>>> price? Thank you
>>>
>>
>>
>> One of the more quiet printers would be something along the lines of
>> a Canon "I" series.....
>>
>> As compared to a Lexmark, which sounds like a friggen can opener,
>> the Canon is virtually silent, LOL
>>
>> They are quiet though. If you were to take a step or two away, you
>> would have to stare at the paper output to see if its actually
>> working or not while its printing.
>>
>>
>
> I agree. I have an i9900. It makes some noise if it is preparing
> itself to print but once it starts printing you can hardly hear the
> printhead moving back and forth. Much quieter than any laser printer
> I've had. And I've had quite a few. And it's certainly quieter than
> any Epson I've had also.
I'm with you there (I have the same unit).
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:51:59 -0400, beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>
>>Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
>>
>> --
>>
>>Hecate
>>Hecate@newsguy.com
>>veni, vidi, reliqui
>
>
>Are you joking? I see a smiley so I guess so..
I don't think you got my hint - very quiet as in dormant, defunct,
kicked the bucket, shuffled off their mortal coil.....
--
Hecate
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:51:59 -0400, beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>
>>Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
>>
>> --
>>
>>Hecate
>>Hecate@newsguy.com
>>veni, vidi, reliqui
>
>
>Are you joking? I see a smiley so I guess so..
I don't think you got my hint - very quiet as in dormant, defunct,
kicked the bucket, shuffled off their mortal coil.....
--
Hecate
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
Hecate <hecate@newsguy.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:51:59 -0400, beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>
>>
>>>Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>Hecate
>>>Hecate@newsguy.com
>>>veni, vidi, reliqui
>>
>>
>>Are you joking? I see a smiley so I guess so..
>
>I don't think you got my hint - very quiet as in dormant, defunct,
>kicked the bucket, shuffled off their mortal coil.....
>
>
> --
>
>Hecate
>Hecate@newsguy.com
>veni, vidi, reliqui
Ah. A dead parrot fan. We need more of those...fans I mean.
Hecate <hecate@newsguy.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:51:59 -0400, beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>
>>
>>>Actually, I usually find Lexmarks are *very* quiet ;-)
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>Hecate
>>>Hecate@newsguy.com
>>>veni, vidi, reliqui
>>
>>
>>Are you joking? I see a smiley so I guess so..
>
>I don't think you got my hint - very quiet as in dormant, defunct,
>kicked the bucket, shuffled off their mortal coil.....
>
>
> --
>
>Hecate
>Hecate@newsguy.com
>veni, vidi, reliqui
Ah. A dead parrot fan. We need more of those...fans I mean.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:29:12 -0400, Rob
<tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>And it's certainly quieter than
>any Epson I've had also.
Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:29:12 -0400, Rob
<tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>And it's certainly quieter than
>any Epson I've had also.
Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
Just Allan <justallan@COLDhotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:29:12 -0400, Rob
><tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>And it's certainly quieter than
>>any Epson I've had also.
>
>Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
Well it could just be that the Epson ruined my hearing so I just
"think" the Canon is quiet.
Just Allan <justallan@COLDhotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:29:12 -0400, Rob
><tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>And it's certainly quieter than
>>any Epson I've had also.
>
>Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
Well it could just be that the Epson ruined my hearing so I just
"think" the Canon is quiet.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:44:23 -0400, Rob
<tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>And it's certainly quieter than
>>>any Epson I've had also.
>>
>>Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
>
>Well it could just be that the Epson ruined my hearing so I just
>"think" the Canon is quiet.
Heh - what does this remind you of?
Beep, beep. Beep, beep. Beep, beep.
Beeeep.... beeeep.... beeeep....
Eee-aw, eee-aw, eee-aw...
Squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak
etc.
Bring back fond memories? (Of when you dropped your epson from above
head height into the trash?) : )
Allan.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:44:23 -0400, Rob
<tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>And it's certainly quieter than
>>>any Epson I've had also.
>>
>>Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
>
>Well it could just be that the Epson ruined my hearing so I just
>"think" the Canon is quiet.
Heh - what does this remind you of?
Beep, beep. Beep, beep. Beep, beep.
Beeeep.... beeeep.... beeeep....
Eee-aw, eee-aw, eee-aw...
Squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak
etc.
Bring back fond memories? (Of when you dropped your epson from above
head height into the trash?) : )
Allan.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
Just Allan <justallan@COLDhotmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:44:23 -0400, Rob
><tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>And it's certainly quieter than
>>>>any Epson I've had also.
>>>
>>>Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
>>
>>Well it could just be that the Epson ruined my hearing so I just
>>"think" the Canon is quiet.
>
>Heh - what does this remind you of?
>
>Beep, beep. Beep, beep. Beep, beep.
>Beeeep.... beeeep.... beeeep....
>Eee-aw, eee-aw, eee-aw...
>Squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak
>etc.
>
>Bring back fond memories? (Of when you dropped your epson from above
>head height into the trash?) : )
>
>Allan.
Actually I donated two of them to my workplace. (They're in a room I
never go into...under any circumstances).
Just Allan <justallan@COLDhotmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:44:23 -0400, Rob
><tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>And it's certainly quieter than
>>>>any Epson I've had also.
>>>
>>>Nah!!! Really? Surely you jest. : )
>>
>>Well it could just be that the Epson ruined my hearing so I just
>>"think" the Canon is quiet.
>
>Heh - what does this remind you of?
>
>Beep, beep. Beep, beep. Beep, beep.
>Beeeep.... beeeep.... beeeep....
>Eee-aw, eee-aw, eee-aw...
>Squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak, squeeeeaaak
>etc.
>
>Bring back fond memories? (Of when you dropped your epson from above
>head height into the trash?) : )
>
>Allan.
Actually I donated two of them to my workplace. (They're in a room I
never go into...under any circumstances).
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:50:27 -0400, Rob
<tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Actually I donated two of them to my workplace. (They're in a room I
>never go into...under any circumstances).
Might that be the rest room? LOL
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:50:27 -0400, Rob
<tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Actually I donated two of them to my workplace. (They're in a room I
>never go into...under any circumstances).
Might that be the rest room? LOL
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:50:27 -0400, Rob
><tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Actually I donated two of them to my workplace. (They're in a room I
>>never go into...under any circumstances).
>
>
>Might that be the rest room? LOL
And now you know...the rest of the story.
beezer <beezer@rezeeb.moc> wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:50:27 -0400, Rob
><tele*deletethis*manr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Actually I donated two of them to my workplace. (They're in a room I
>>never go into...under any circumstances).
>
>
>Might that be the rest room? LOL
And now you know...the rest of the story.
TRENDING THREADS
-
News Microsoft updates Windows 11 24H2 requirements, CPU must support SSE4.2 or the OS will not boot- Started by Admin
- Replies: 14
-
-
Question New Build GPU help- ASRock Steel Legend OC Radeon RX 7900 GRE - Keeps turning off
- Started by bp240
- Replies: 5
-
Question How can I make my AMD GPU scale *all* resolutions to 1080p, even resolutions that are "supported" by my TV?
- Started by Sol33t303
- Replies: 7
-
News Windows 11 update brings advertisements to the start menu
- Started by Admin
- Replies: 19
-
Question PC randomly not recognizing USB devices after reboot
- Started by crasherT
- Replies: 8
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Question New Build, Fans Running, RGB working, no mouse, no keyboard, no display
- Latest: MysteriousMeat
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram