BTW, still jerky on an Intel 735.

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

I loaded it onto my other work machine. Still get the
jerkiness.

It's a DFI lan party board with ddr2, I think the cpu is Intel
735 or something like that.

This machine starts photoshop in 2 seconds, longer in the A64,
but they sometimes seem the same speed.

I don't know what the heck is going on. I just want something
to vege out on while I'm rendering stuff.

Thanks to those for helping.

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

BillT wrote:
> I loaded it onto my other work machine. Still get the
> jerkiness.
>
> It's a DFI lan party board with ddr2, I think the cpu is Intel
> 735 or something like that.
>
> This machine starts photoshop in 2 seconds, longer in the A64,
> but they sometimes seem the same speed.
>
> I don't know what the heck is going on. I just want something
> to vege out on while I'm rendering stuff.
>
> Thanks to those for helping.
>
>

If you are rendering on the same machine, then this is the problem.
MAME doesnt like sharing (no joke).

--
MAME(TM) - History In The Making...

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Thanks for the help, but I don't think this machine renders.
They set it up to send jobs to the network. But even when I
render local, I can start graphics applications in seconds.

In article <Xns963E603F8D03CLouiscypherhellorg@140.99.99.130>,
arcade.master@googlemail.net says...
> * MCR Wrote in alt.games.mame:
>
> > BillT wrote:
> >> I loaded it onto my other work machine. Still get the
> >> jerkiness.
> >>
> >> It's a DFI lan party board with ddr2, I think the cpu is Intel
> >> 735 or something like that.
> >>
> >> This machine starts photoshop in 2 seconds, longer in the A64,
> >> but they sometimes seem the same speed.
> >>
> >> I don't know what the heck is going on. I just want something
> >> to vege out on while I'm rendering stuff.
> >>
> >> Thanks to those for helping.
> >
> > If you are rendering on the same machine, then this is the problem.
> > MAME doesnt like sharing (no joke).
> >
>
> Especially since rendering is just as CPU intensive as MAME. Both
> applications want 100% CPU time.
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Thank you. I'll check later.

In article <d462i4$ose$1@domitilla.aioe.org>,
mcr@lazarusnospam.org.uk says...
> BillT wrote:
> > Thanks for the help, but I don't think this machine renders.
> > They set it up to send jobs to the network. But even when I
> > render local, I can start graphics applications in seconds.
> >
>
> Before starting MAME (assuming you are using windows) press CTRL+ALT+DEL
> and see processes running, have a look and see if you have 99% idle. If
> you see it fluctuate and/or drop then it is likely to be
>
> A) Services or processes that eat cpu cycles like Anti-virus
> or
> B) Spyware, in which case run Spybot S&D
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

FSogol wrote:
>
>
> BillT wrote:
>
>> Thank you. I'll top post later.
>>
>
>

LOL! My newsreader marked that 'adjustment' as part of the last post!

--
MAME(TM) - History In The Making...

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

* Rutger6559 wrote in alt.games.mame:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:27:41 GMT, SINNER
><arcade.master@googlemail.net> wrote:

><snip>

> Hey David, can you shoot me an email at my inner circle addr? I just
> tried to send you one at your comcast addr, but it bounced right away.
> I guess you've changed ISP's.

> Thanks!!

I cant find the IC addy. For me use arcade.master at gmail dot com.

--
David
No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings.
-- William Blake

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

* Rutger6559 wrote in alt.games.mame:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:57:23 GMT, SINNER
><99nesorjd@gates_of_hell.invalid> wrote:

>>arcade.master at gmail dot com

> You've got mail!

Hmmm, just checked, nada

--
David
If mathematically you end up with the incorrect answer, try multiplying
by the page number
-- Murphy's Laws on Technology n°35

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 02:11:09 +0000, Rutger6559 wrote:

>>> You've got mail!
>>
>>Hmmm, just checked, nada
>
> OK, let's try again.

http://tinyurl.com/9xere

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:22:28 +0000, SINNER wrote:

>>>>> You've got mail!
>>>>
>>>>Hmmm, just checked, nada
>>>
>>> OK, let's try again.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/9xere
>>
>>
> Groan

http://tinyurl.com/3x65y

?

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:31:21 +0000, SINNER wrote:

> * innocent_lamb Wrote in alt.games.mame:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:22:28 +0000, SINNER wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> You've got mail!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hmmm, just checked, nada
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, let's try again.
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/9xere
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Groan
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/3x65y
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
> http://preparedness.com/flarandsmoks.html


http://tinyurl.com/7ycgn

!

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:30:41 -0500, Dire Radiant wrote:

> I think this thread needs one of these:
>
> http://preparedness.com/manovxestli.html

You're saying that you have achieved a flash of deep insight through
reading this exchange?

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:44:03 +0000, SINNER wrote:

> Thats actually what I was looking for when I posted the previous link

Tsk.

Point for the lamb! *tee hee*