Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Have an NF7-S - going to replace it with ??????

Last response: in Overclocking
Share
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 18, 2004 9:38:11 PM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Hey all,

My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put my NF7-S
rev 2.0 board in his box.


What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't kept up for
the last few months so I dont know whats out there.

AN7 ???

More about : nf7 replace

Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 3:48:32 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

> My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put my NF7-S
> rev 2.0 board in his box.

> What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't kept up for
> the last few months so I dont know whats out there.

I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you want an
Athlon 64
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 3:48:33 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

I was thinking about going with an athlon 64, and mobo, but the prices still
seem pretty high for not much of a performance boost.

will the athlon 64 be better for video encoding? i tried making some dvds
of old vhs tapes, and it takes forever on my XP3200

the the athlon 64's still use pc3200 ram?

"Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put my
NF7-S
> > rev 2.0 board in his box.
>
> > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't kept up
for
> > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
>
> I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you want an
> Athlon 64
Related resources
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 3:48:33 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put my
NF7-S
> > rev 2.0 board in his box.
>
> > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't kept up
for
> > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
>
> I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you want an
> Athlon 64


The DFI's are good for ultra-high FSB's (265 MHz without raising a sweat)
and get great timings from high (3.3) v-dimm.
They're limited to 2.0v-core - but it doesn't really impact your max clock
by more than 20 - 30 gross MHz.
A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of course,
cost the Earth.
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 3:48:34 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

See within your post:

"ZigZag Master" <zigzagSPAMMYmaster@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2gvev3F7dkerU1@uni-berlin.de...
> I was thinking about going with an athlon 64, and mobo, but the prices
still
> seem pretty high for not much of a performance boost.

Actually, the boost is more than you might think.
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q2/opteron-x50/in...
(scroll down to the bottom graphic and note that the AMD64 chips even best
the Opteron chips in this category.

>
> will the athlon 64 be better for video encoding? i tried making some dvds
> of old vhs tapes, and it takes forever on my XP3200

That is a problem with your HD and not enough RAM. I recommend 2 gigs of
DDRAM minimum for these endeavors.

>
> the the athlon 64's still use pc3200 ram?

Yes, and it can even use PC2700 ram if it is high enough quality. :o )


>
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 3:48:34 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

> A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of course,
> cost the Earth.
>

That is total BULLSHIT

PLONK!
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 10:49:21 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Wayne wrote:
> That is a problem with your HD and not enough RAM. I
> recommend 2 gigs ofDDRAM minimum for these endeavors.

Generally, a modern HDD is not the bottleneck unless it is
fragmented. In my unscientific experiments with an XP2500+
and MPEG-2 encoding with the MainConcept encoder, memory
bandwidth was the limiting factor. That is, raising the FSB at a
lower multiplier showed a decent improvement. A higher
multiplier alone showed almost no improvement. And I believe
a GB of memory will do just fine.
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 19, 2004 10:57:59 AM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

The DFI NF2 Ultra Infinity I had would not go much over 220FSB with any
stability...even using the 'Beta' BIOS's that everyone appears to need to
get decent performance out of the board. I think the problem is memory, I
was using 2 x 512MB of Corsair XMS3500 (BH-5)....but to get real high FSB's
you need to run only 2 x 256MB modules, not much use if you're into video
encoding. Additionally the DFI does not have room for really big heatsinks
and many report problems with the firewire and LAN, also performance is
lower than the NF7 at similar FSB and clock speed.
I also tried two AN7's and they overclock worse than either the NF7 or
DFI....in fact I could not even get 200FSB with the CPU Interface setting
enabled.....definitely keep clear of the AN7 if you want performance &
overclocking.

I went back to my NF7-S....still the best performance/overclocking/all-round
Socket A board on offer...in my opinion...If I were you I'd keep the NF7-S
--
*****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****
"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c8e5mb$gvk$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>
> "Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put my
> NF7-S
> > > rev 2.0 board in his box.
> >
> > > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't kept
up
> for
> > > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
> >
> > I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you want an
> > Athlon 64
>
>
> The DFI's are good for ultra-high FSB's (265 MHz without raising a sweat)
> and get great timings from high (3.3) v-dimm.
> They're limited to 2.0v-core - but it doesn't really impact your max clock
> by more than 20 - 30 gross MHz.
> A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of course,
> cost the Earth.
>
>
May 19, 2004 3:34:49 PM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

On Tue, 18 May 2004 23:19:39 +0000 (UTC), "Scumball"
<scumball@btinternet.com> wrote:

>A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of course,
>cost the Earth.

Put down the crack pipe!
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 20, 2004 12:28:59 PM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Agree.

I went from an NF7-S to a DFI Ultra Infinity.

- the first was DOA
- the second wouldn't do > 200FSB and died when my video card went kapoot
- the third does more like 230FSB, and may be limited by my memory from
doing more

So I think there's an element of potluck involved. A quick search of the
relevant forums shows a lot of problems with the boards manufactured outside
of Taiwan (warped ZIF sockets etc) and issues with SATA performance.
Heatsink clearance due to both CPU socket placement (it's ridiculous) and
compenent clearances can also be an issue. There hasn't been an official
BIOS release since last November and a number of the beta bioses (apart from
invalidating your warranty) seem to kill a large number of boards.

However...

- there's no doubt that a good one, with the right BIOS and components, goes
like a scalded cat
- there's clearance enough for my Maze 4 block on the CPU socket
- there are 4 SATA sockets compared to NF7-S' 2
- it's inexpensive (board #3 was £48)
- it doesn't need a socket wire mod to hit high FSBs with an XP-M like the
NF7 does.
- it doesn't appear to have the SATA corruption issues that some NF7's did
- it doesn't have the 10x and 10.5 multiplier issue with 1T memory timings
that NF7's did/do.

Your money, your vote.

FWIW, if board #3 dies I'll probably go back to an NF7-S. At least Abit
update the bios occasionally.

HTH



"BigBadger" <big_badger@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:c8et11$p5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> The DFI NF2 Ultra Infinity I had would not go much over 220FSB with any
> stability...even using the 'Beta' BIOS's that everyone appears to need to
> get decent performance out of the board. I think the problem is memory, I
> was using 2 x 512MB of Corsair XMS3500 (BH-5)....but to get real high
FSB's
> you need to run only 2 x 256MB modules, not much use if you're into video
> encoding. Additionally the DFI does not have room for really big heatsinks
> and many report problems with the firewire and LAN, also performance is
> lower than the NF7 at similar FSB and clock speed.
> I also tried two AN7's and they overclock worse than either the NF7 or
> DFI....in fact I could not even get 200FSB with the CPU Interface setting
> enabled.....definitely keep clear of the AN7 if you want performance &
> overclocking.
>
> I went back to my NF7-S....still the best
performance/overclocking/all-round
> Socket A board on offer...in my opinion...If I were you I'd keep the NF7-S
> --
> *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****
> "Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:c8e5mb$gvk$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> >
> > "Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > > > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put my
> > NF7-S
> > > > rev 2.0 board in his box.
> > >
> > > > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't kept
> up
> > for
> > > > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
> > >
> > > I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you want
an
> > > Athlon 64
> >
> >
> > The DFI's are good for ultra-high FSB's (265 MHz without raising a
sweat)
> > and get great timings from high (3.3) v-dimm.
> > They're limited to 2.0v-core - but it doesn't really impact your max
clock
> > by more than 20 - 30 gross MHz.
> > A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of course,
> > cost the Earth.
> >
> >
>
>
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 20, 2004 12:44:53 PM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

I've had 3 DFI's - and they all cracked 250 FSB with ease.
Yes, there's an element of sudden cot-death risk with DFI - but high FSB's
are guaranteed with 12/31 BIOS and turning off CPC (loses around 0.5-1%
bandwidth).

"anthonyi" <anthony.i67_xxx@ntlworld_xxx.com> wrote in message
news:w%Zqc.19$wm4.16@newsfe3-gui...
> Agree.
>
> I went from an NF7-S to a DFI Ultra Infinity.
>
> - the first was DOA
> - the second wouldn't do > 200FSB and died when my video card went kapoot
> - the third does more like 230FSB, and may be limited by my memory from
> doing more
>
> So I think there's an element of potluck involved. A quick search of the
> relevant forums shows a lot of problems with the boards manufactured
outside
> of Taiwan (warped ZIF sockets etc) and issues with SATA performance.
> Heatsink clearance due to both CPU socket placement (it's ridiculous) and
> compenent clearances can also be an issue. There hasn't been an official
> BIOS release since last November and a number of the beta bioses (apart
from
> invalidating your warranty) seem to kill a large number of boards.
>
> However...
>
> - there's no doubt that a good one, with the right BIOS and components,
goes
> like a scalded cat
> - there's clearance enough for my Maze 4 block on the CPU socket
> - there are 4 SATA sockets compared to NF7-S' 2
> - it's inexpensive (board #3 was £48)
> - it doesn't need a socket wire mod to hit high FSBs with an XP-M like the
> NF7 does.
> - it doesn't appear to have the SATA corruption issues that some NF7's did
> - it doesn't have the 10x and 10.5 multiplier issue with 1T memory timings
> that NF7's did/do.
>
> Your money, your vote.
>
> FWIW, if board #3 dies I'll probably go back to an NF7-S. At least Abit
> update the bios occasionally.
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> "BigBadger" <big_badger@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:c8et11$p5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > The DFI NF2 Ultra Infinity I had would not go much over 220FSB with any
> > stability...even using the 'Beta' BIOS's that everyone appears to need
to
> > get decent performance out of the board. I think the problem is memory,
I
> > was using 2 x 512MB of Corsair XMS3500 (BH-5)....but to get real high
> FSB's
> > you need to run only 2 x 256MB modules, not much use if you're into
video
> > encoding. Additionally the DFI does not have room for really big
heatsinks
> > and many report problems with the firewire and LAN, also performance is
> > lower than the NF7 at similar FSB and clock speed.
> > I also tried two AN7's and they overclock worse than either the NF7 or
> > DFI....in fact I could not even get 200FSB with the CPU Interface
setting
> > enabled.....definitely keep clear of the AN7 if you want performance &
> > overclocking.
> >
> > I went back to my NF7-S....still the best
> performance/overclocking/all-round
> > Socket A board on offer...in my opinion...If I were you I'd keep the
NF7-S
> > --
> > *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****
> > "Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8e5mb$gvk$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > >
> > > "Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > > > > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put
my
> > > NF7-S
> > > > > rev 2.0 board in his box.
> > > >
> > > > > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't
kept
> > up
> > > for
> > > > > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
> > > >
> > > > I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you
want
> an
> > > > Athlon 64
> > >
> > >
> > > The DFI's are good for ultra-high FSB's (265 MHz without raising a
> sweat)
> > > and get great timings from high (3.3) v-dimm.
> > > They're limited to 2.0v-core - but it doesn't really impact your max
> clock
> > > by more than 20 - 30 gross MHz.
> > > A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of
course,
> > > cost the Earth.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 20, 2004 2:31:45 PM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Your experience is better than mine. I was hoping for that sort of
performance but, certainly with the second board, no combination of voltages
and memory timings would get it above 200FSB although I was using the 1/21
and 1/31 beta bioses, not 12/31. Using the original offical bios I was
unable to get past 185FSB. I've provided a few details below, in case
anything strikes you as to why I'm not at, say 240FSB.

- My cooling is adequate - Danger Den water - and temps at 2.7GHz (12*225)
on my third board are at around 42c, full load.

- My memory is Mushkin using BH-6 chips - not as good as BH-5 but most sites
seem to be able to produce up to 245FSB with these DIMMS. I have got 2*512MB
DIMMS running dual channel at 11-2-2-2 CPC enabled at 225FSB currently.
Memtest stable. vdimm=3.0v, more voltage doesn't seem to help...neither does
turning CPC off (it dramatically reduces incidence of memtest errors (test
#5) but does not eliminate them even at vdimm=3.3v)

- BIOS is 1/31 beta.

- Processor is XP-M 2500+ @ 1.95 vcore

- chipset is at 1.6v (increases don't seem to help), cooling via a Microcool
Northpole.

- chipsinks on the MOSFETs for cpu, agp and ram

- ram ratio is 1:1

- agp clock at 66.

Would love some help to increase my FSB if you have any ideas.

Cheers.
Anthony

PS - still not crazy about the CPU socket placement and BIOS sudden death
problems though!



"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c8hr64$snf$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> I've had 3 DFI's - and they all cracked 250 FSB with ease.
> Yes, there's an element of sudden cot-death risk with DFI - but high FSB's
> are guaranteed with 12/31 BIOS and turning off CPC (loses around 0.5-1%
> bandwidth).
>
> "anthonyi" <anthony.i67_xxx@ntlworld_xxx.com> wrote in message
> news:w%Zqc.19$wm4.16@newsfe3-gui...
> > Agree.
> >
> > I went from an NF7-S to a DFI Ultra Infinity.
> >
> > - the first was DOA
> > - the second wouldn't do > 200FSB and died when my video card went
kapoot
> > - the third does more like 230FSB, and may be limited by my memory from
> > doing more
> >
> > So I think there's an element of potluck involved. A quick search of the
> > relevant forums shows a lot of problems with the boards manufactured
> outside
> > of Taiwan (warped ZIF sockets etc) and issues with SATA performance.
> > Heatsink clearance due to both CPU socket placement (it's ridiculous)
and
> > compenent clearances can also be an issue. There hasn't been an official
> > BIOS release since last November and a number of the beta bioses (apart
> from
> > invalidating your warranty) seem to kill a large number of boards.
> >
> > However...
> >
> > - there's no doubt that a good one, with the right BIOS and components,
> goes
> > like a scalded cat
> > - there's clearance enough for my Maze 4 block on the CPU socket
> > - there are 4 SATA sockets compared to NF7-S' 2
> > - it's inexpensive (board #3 was £48)
> > - it doesn't need a socket wire mod to hit high FSBs with an XP-M like
the
> > NF7 does.
> > - it doesn't appear to have the SATA corruption issues that some NF7's
did
> > - it doesn't have the 10x and 10.5 multiplier issue with 1T memory
timings
> > that NF7's did/do.
> >
> > Your money, your vote.
> >
> > FWIW, if board #3 dies I'll probably go back to an NF7-S. At least Abit
> > update the bios occasionally.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> >
> >
> > "BigBadger" <big_badger@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8et11$p5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > > The DFI NF2 Ultra Infinity I had would not go much over 220FSB with
any
> > > stability...even using the 'Beta' BIOS's that everyone appears to need
> to
> > > get decent performance out of the board. I think the problem is
memory,
> I
> > > was using 2 x 512MB of Corsair XMS3500 (BH-5)....but to get real high
> > FSB's
> > > you need to run only 2 x 256MB modules, not much use if you're into
> video
> > > encoding. Additionally the DFI does not have room for really big
> heatsinks
> > > and many report problems with the firewire and LAN, also performance
is
> > > lower than the NF7 at similar FSB and clock speed.
> > > I also tried two AN7's and they overclock worse than either the NF7 or
> > > DFI....in fact I could not even get 200FSB with the CPU Interface
> setting
> > > enabled.....definitely keep clear of the AN7 if you want performance &
> > > overclocking.
> > >
> > > I went back to my NF7-S....still the best
> > performance/overclocking/all-round
> > > Socket A board on offer...in my opinion...If I were you I'd keep the
> NF7-S
> > > --
> > > *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****
> > > "Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> > > news:c8e5mb$gvk$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > > > > > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to put
> my
> > > > NF7-S
> > > > > > rev 2.0 board in his box.
> > > > >
> > > > > > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine? Haven't
> kept
> > > up
> > > > for
> > > > > > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you
> want
> > an
> > > > > Athlon 64
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The DFI's are good for ultra-high FSB's (265 MHz without raising a
> > sweat)
> > > > and get great timings from high (3.3) v-dimm.
> > > > They're limited to 2.0v-core - but it doesn't really impact your max
> > clock
> > > > by more than 20 - 30 gross MHz.
> > > > A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of
> course,
> > > > cost the Earth.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Anonymous
a b K Overclocking
May 20, 2004 2:35:54 PM

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"anthonyi" <anthony.i67_xxx@ntlworld_xxx.com> wrote in message
news:sO%qc.24$wm4.3@newsfe3-gui...
> Your experience is better than mine. I was hoping for that sort of
> performance but, certainly with the second board, no combination of
voltages
> and memory timings would get it above 200FSB although I was using the 1/21
> and 1/31 beta bioses, not 12/31. Using the original offical bios I was
> unable to get past 185FSB. I've provided a few details below, in case
> anything strikes you as to why I'm not at, say 240FSB.
>
> - My cooling is adequate - Danger Den water - and temps at 2.7GHz (12*225)
> on my third board are at around 42c, full load.
>
> - My memory is Mushkin using BH-6 chips - not as good as BH-5 but most
sites
> seem to be able to produce up to 245FSB with these DIMMS. I have got
2*512MB
> DIMMS running dual channel at 11-2-2-2 CPC enabled


Drop your CAS to 3.0


at 225FSB currently.
> Memtest stable. vdimm=3.0v, more voltage doesn't seem to help...neither
does
> turning CPC off (it dramatically reduces incidence of memtest errors (test
> #5) but does not eliminate them even at vdimm=3.3v)
>
> - BIOS is 1/31 beta.
>
> - Processor is XP-M 2500+ @ 1.95 vcore
>
> - chipset is at 1.6v (increases don't seem to help), cooling via a
Microcool
> Northpole.


Bad move - the best cooling is the stock sink with the stock thermal tape
and a small fan.
If you're using goop, the concavity of the chip may mean your NB is
overheating .... does the sink get warm ?


>
> - chipsinks on the MOSFETs for cpu, agp and ram
>
> - ram ratio is 1:1
>
> - agp clock at 66.
>
> Would love some help to increase my FSB if you have any ideas.


Try enabling fastwrites.


>
> Cheers.
> Anthony
>
> PS - still not crazy about the CPU socket placement and BIOS sudden death
> problems though!
>
>
>
> "Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:c8hr64$snf$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > I've had 3 DFI's - and they all cracked 250 FSB with ease.
> > Yes, there's an element of sudden cot-death risk with DFI - but high
FSB's
> > are guaranteed with 12/31 BIOS and turning off CPC (loses around 0.5-1%
> > bandwidth).
> >
> > "anthonyi" <anthony.i67_xxx@ntlworld_xxx.com> wrote in message
> > news:w%Zqc.19$wm4.16@newsfe3-gui...
> > > Agree.
> > >
> > > I went from an NF7-S to a DFI Ultra Infinity.
> > >
> > > - the first was DOA
> > > - the second wouldn't do > 200FSB and died when my video card went
> kapoot
> > > - the third does more like 230FSB, and may be limited by my memory
from
> > > doing more
> > >
> > > So I think there's an element of potluck involved. A quick search of
the
> > > relevant forums shows a lot of problems with the boards manufactured
> > outside
> > > of Taiwan (warped ZIF sockets etc) and issues with SATA performance.
> > > Heatsink clearance due to both CPU socket placement (it's ridiculous)
> and
> > > compenent clearances can also be an issue. There hasn't been an
official
> > > BIOS release since last November and a number of the beta bioses
(apart
> > from
> > > invalidating your warranty) seem to kill a large number of boards.
> > >
> > > However...
> > >
> > > - there's no doubt that a good one, with the right BIOS and
components,
> > goes
> > > like a scalded cat
> > > - there's clearance enough for my Maze 4 block on the CPU socket
> > > - there are 4 SATA sockets compared to NF7-S' 2
> > > - it's inexpensive (board #3 was £48)
> > > - it doesn't need a socket wire mod to hit high FSBs with an XP-M like
> the
> > > NF7 does.
> > > - it doesn't appear to have the SATA corruption issues that some NF7's
> did
> > > - it doesn't have the 10x and 10.5 multiplier issue with 1T memory
> timings
> > > that NF7's did/do.
> > >
> > > Your money, your vote.
> > >
> > > FWIW, if board #3 dies I'll probably go back to an NF7-S. At least
Abit
> > > update the bios occasionally.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "BigBadger" <big_badger@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> > > news:c8et11$p5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > > > The DFI NF2 Ultra Infinity I had would not go much over 220FSB with
> any
> > > > stability...even using the 'Beta' BIOS's that everyone appears to
need
> > to
> > > > get decent performance out of the board. I think the problem is
> memory,
> > I
> > > > was using 2 x 512MB of Corsair XMS3500 (BH-5)....but to get real
high
> > > FSB's
> > > > you need to run only 2 x 256MB modules, not much use if you're into
> > video
> > > > encoding. Additionally the DFI does not have room for really big
> > heatsinks
> > > > and many report problems with the firewire and LAN, also performance
> is
> > > > lower than the NF7 at similar FSB and clock speed.
> > > > I also tried two AN7's and they overclock worse than either the NF7
or
> > > > DFI....in fact I could not even get 200FSB with the CPU Interface
> > setting
> > > > enabled.....definitely keep clear of the AN7 if you want performance
&
> > > > overclocking.
> > > >
> > > > I went back to my NF7-S....still the best
> > > performance/overclocking/all-round
> > > > Socket A board on offer...in my opinion...If I were you I'd keep the
> > NF7-S
> > > > --
> > > > *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****
> > > > "Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:c8e5mb$gvk$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Josef Varela" <darkpepe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:kxt91f98nl35.chwlb9evg3id$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > > > > > > My buddy wants me to build him a new machine. I am going to
put
> > my
> > > > > NF7-S
> > > > > > > rev 2.0 board in his box.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > What should I be looking at as a replacement for mine?
Haven't
> > kept
> > > > up
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > the last few months so I dont know whats out there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don´t think there´s anything better than the NF7-S, except you
> > want
> > > an
> > > > > > Athlon 64
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The DFI's are good for ultra-high FSB's (265 MHz without raising a
> > > sweat)
> > > > > and get great timings from high (3.3) v-dimm.
> > > > > They're limited to 2.0v-core - but it doesn't really impact your
max
> > > clock
> > > > > by more than 20 - 30 gross MHz.
> > > > > A64's don't overclock well and die at the drop of a hat - and of
> > course,
> > > > > cost the Earth.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
!