Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (
More info?)
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:25:31 +0100, "BigBadger"
<big_badger@NOSPAM.com> wrote:
>*****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****
>> Yes definitely worth it, I keep a spare on in the drawer in case I
>> have a leaking chip pan that needs repairing.
>> That's all they are good for. Shims and Arctic Silver were the most
>> hyped, overblown product on the world stage untill this week that was,
>> .............now the ' Olympics ' has taken over the number one spot.
>> BoroLad
>LOL..... There have been at least 5 versions of Arctic Silver and also
>Arctic Aluminia and Ceramique thrown in for good measure. The strange thing
>is in all the tests every new Arctic version does 2 to 3 Deg C better than
>the previous type. Now add them all together and Arctic Silver 5 should be
>12 to 17 Deg C cooler than the original Arctic Silver! At this rate, by the
>time it gets to Arctic Silver 10 we should be approaching sub-zero temps on
>air cooling !!!!!... I can hardly wait.
Yeh, eventually some marketing type will proclaim that it's -6ºC
because of the recently introduced ' nano technology water cooling '
element.
When people complain they can't see [ Emperor new clothes ] the
radiator or pipes they'll be told . . . exactly !, . . . that's the
point of nano - it's reduced to the point where the human eye can't
see it, go on buy some more!
>Or maybe the fact that the sites who do the tests either sell directly, or
>get revenue from adverts for, Arctic products, has something to do with it
>;o)
Well you banged that nail in where it belongs. If they paid me I'd
prove [ by the usual ' lies lies & statistics ] how much better this
version is than the last ... .... honest !
8-
BoroLad
N.B excellent point on the reductive " 12 to 17 Deg C cooler "