AMD XP2600 vs Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

exaqctly what the topic says

AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache


I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows

Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache

which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including
gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Well i have a 2600xp and my mates 2.8 ghz celeron system runs like a dog
compared to mine.


doughy



"Christo" <chris@juststuff.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2pri2tFodegdU1@uni-berlin.de...
> exaqctly what the topic says
>
> AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache
>
>
> I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows
>
> Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache
>
> which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including
> gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc.
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:48:44 +0100, Christo wrote:

> exactly what the topic says
>
> AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache
>
> I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows
>
> Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache
>
> which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including
> gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc.

The new Celeron 335 (2.8GHz) is about equal to an XP 2400+ in some apps.
It falls way behind the AMD in others. The Sempron's ratings are for
direct comparison to Celerons. And a Sempron 2800+ is basically an XP 2400+.


--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Christo" <chris@juststuff.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2pri2tFodegdU1@uni-berlin.de...
> exaqctly what the topic says
>
> AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache
>
>
> I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows
>
> Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache
>
> which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including
> gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc.
>
>
Can't believe youre asking... Athlon without a doubt.

If you havent already bought it yet, get a mobile 2500+

hamman