Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (
More info?)
"Courseyauto" <courseyauto@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041003145120.10984.00001344@mb-m14.aol.com...
>
> How much faster is a 3000 A64 than a 3000 XP??
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
> The XP 3000 is 2.16 ghz and can be used with dual channel memory
> motherboard.
> The 754 pin 64 3000 is 2.0GHz and is single channel memory controller
> built
> into the CPU. The 939 pin 64 3000 is 1.8GHz and has a built in dual
> channel
> memory controller. All three have 512 L2 cache. I would say the 939 pin 64
> 3000
> would be the fastest of the 3 because the memory controller is faster on
> the
> 939 because it has less latency than the socket A boards and the FSB is
> higher
> on the 939 64-3000 which is 2000 MHz. The 939 is the fastest but cost
> about
> $60 more than the 3000 XP. DOUG
> heres the AMD web site with the Athlon 64 specs.
>
>
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487
> %5E10248,00.html
I don't know what news reader you are using, but is their anyway you can
configure it to show the original text indented with a > sign as above? I
am sure it would be of benefit to the many readers of your posts. And apart
from anything else, goodness knows how you would make multiple comments, 1
after each of several lines of text. It would be impossible to read.
Thanks
Chip.