whats the difference

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz

 

[Mike]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>
>

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E10248,00.html

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Mike" <mike@poolsters.on.ca> wrote in message
news:L6Pmd.84494$vO1.488883@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>> between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>>
>>
>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E10248,00.html
>

ah so its the amount of cache. brilliant - thanks for that

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Mike" <mike@poolsters.on.ca> wrote in message
news:L6Pmd.84494$vO1.488883@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> "Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>> between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>>
>>
>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E10248,00.html
>

very strange - i've just been told by the seller of one i have my eye on
that its a 3200 754 pin and its 'definately' 512kb cache.

oem chip - would that make a difference ?

 

[steve]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Chris 159 wrote:
> "Mike" <mike@poolsters.on.ca> wrote in message
> news:L6Pmd.84494$vO1.488883@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>>
>> "Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>> between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E10248,00.html
>>
>
> very strange - i've just been told by the seller of one i have my eye
> on that its a 3200 754 pin and its 'definately' 512kb cache.
>
> oem chip - would that make a difference ?

No

HTH
Steve

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Chris 159 wrote:
> "Mike" <mike@poolsters.on.ca> wrote in message
> news:L6Pmd.84494$vO1.488883@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>>
>> "Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>> between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5
E10248,00.html
>>
>
> very strange - i've just been told by the seller of one i have my eye
> on that its a 3200 754 pin and its 'definately' 512kb cache.
>
> oem chip - would that make a difference ?

No, but what it would be is a Newcastle 3200 (ADA3200AEP4AX, 2.2GHz, 512KB
L2) as opposed to a Clawhammer (ADA3200AEP5AP/ADA3200AEP5AR, 2.0GHz, 1024KB
L2). That's a Good Thing

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Michael Brown" <see@signature.below> wrote in message
news:1PSmd.3395$9A.129529@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Chris 159 wrote:
>> "Mike" <mike@poolsters.on.ca> wrote in message
>> news:L6Pmd.84494$vO1.488883@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>>>
>>> "Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>>> between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5
> E10248,00.html
>>>
>>
>> very strange - i've just been told by the seller of one i have my eye
>> on that its a 3200 754 pin and its 'definately' 512kb cache.
>>
>> oem chip - would that make a difference ?
>
> No, but what it would be is a Newcastle 3200 (ADA3200AEP4AX, 2.2GHz, 512KB
> L2) as opposed to a Clawhammer (ADA3200AEP5AP/ADA3200AEP5AR, 2.0GHz,
> 1024KB
> L2). That's a Good Thing

oh right

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Chris 159 wrote:

> "Mike" <mike@poolsters.on.ca> wrote in message
> news:L6Pmd.84494$vO1.488883@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
>>"Chris 159" <temp@cdelectrics.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:cngdpg$d07$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>
>>>between the athlon 64 3000 and the 3200 ? they both run at 2ghz
>>>
>>>
>>
>>http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E10248,00.html
>>
>
>
> very strange - i've just been told by the seller of one i have my eye on
> that its a 3200 754 pin and its 'definately' 512kb cache.
>
> oem chip - would that make a difference ?
>
>
>
There are two 3200+ made. One is 2000 MHz and have 1 MB cache and the
other is 2200 MHz and have 512 KB cache. The one with the larger cache
has the old Clawhammer core which have more issues with RAM (for
instance Twinmos 3200 often must be underclocked to 2700 to start) while
the other has the new Newcastle core that has less issues with RAM and
also overclocks better.