G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)
Currently I'm running an unlocked 2500 on an NF7-S v.2 at 3200+ speed at
1.825v. I'd like to try an XP-M 2400 or 2500 to try an squeeze a couple
hundred or so Mhz out of it. I'm using Hyperx PC3200 and an SLK900a
HS/92mm Panaflo combo. Which processor should I be looking at - the 35w or
45w? And is a 2400 the better way to go because of the lower multiplier?
Is there a particular part ID or date I should be looking for? I realize
this is a very small upgrade, but I thnk I can probably sell off the retail
2500 for nearly what the replacement processor will cost. I seem to keep
my stuff forever (even still running my IT5H/K6-233 as SMTP and FTP server,
and BP6/dual Celeron as a Terminal Server), and since there doesn't seem to
be another MS desktop OS coming for a few years, I don't really see the
need to go 64bit yet. Thanks for reading, any input is appreciated.
--
Peder (Please reply to group only, email invalid)
Currently I'm running an unlocked 2500 on an NF7-S v.2 at 3200+ speed at
1.825v. I'd like to try an XP-M 2400 or 2500 to try an squeeze a couple
hundred or so Mhz out of it. I'm using Hyperx PC3200 and an SLK900a
HS/92mm Panaflo combo. Which processor should I be looking at - the 35w or
45w? And is a 2400 the better way to go because of the lower multiplier?
Is there a particular part ID or date I should be looking for? I realize
this is a very small upgrade, but I thnk I can probably sell off the retail
2500 for nearly what the replacement processor will cost. I seem to keep
my stuff forever (even still running my IT5H/K6-233 as SMTP and FTP server,
and BP6/dual Celeron as a Terminal Server), and since there doesn't seem to
be another MS desktop OS coming for a few years, I don't really see the
need to go 64bit yet. Thanks for reading, any input is appreciated.
--
Peder (Please reply to group only, email invalid)