1.75 vcore safe?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Running at 1.725 now, will upping it to 1.75 cost me anything in terms of
shortening the lifespan of the CPU?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:53:13 -0500, Jack Spungo wrote:

> Running at 1.725 now, will upping it to 1.75 cost me anything in terms of
> shortening the lifespan of the CPU?

Not enough to worrry about. Just watch the temps.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

 

[chip]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Jack Spungo" <Spungo@Spungo.com> wrote in message
news:yoadnWCy7eHRcS7cRVn-pg@rogers.com...
> Running at 1.725 now, will upping it to 1.75 cost me anything in terms of
> shortening the lifespan of the CPU?

What's the CPU?????

Its OK for most, but its quite (very?) high for 90nm Athlon 64's.

Chip

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Wes Newell" wrote
> Not enough to worrry about. Just watch the temps.
>
> --
> Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

Cheers Wes, my vcore is 1.725 at present and I was wondering the same thing.

[OT] I recently installed cpuidle and a Cooler Master Aero 7 + and my temps
have dropped to 34/38 at idle.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Jack Spungo" wrote
> Running at 1.725 now, will upping it to 1.75 cost me anything in terms of
> shortening the lifespan of the CPU?


Hi,

Lol I just got a 2nd hand ATHLON of eBay and that runs at 1.75vCore default,
yup its a Palomino!

works good though! Stuck a Thermalright ALX-800 on it with a silent Akasa
80mm fan, good stuyff!

Wayne ][

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

It' an Athlon XP 2600+ Barton running at 2.2 GHz (up from 1.9GHz)

"Chip" <anneonymouse@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:31imkmF38tqj8U1@individual.net...
>
> "Jack Spungo" <Spungo@Spungo.com> wrote in message
> news:yoadnWCy7eHRcS7cRVn-pg@rogers.com...
>> Running at 1.725 now, will upping it to 1.75 cost me anything in terms of
>> shortening the lifespan of the CPU?
>
> What's the CPU?????
>
> Its OK for most, but its quite (very?) high for 90nm Athlon 64's.
>
> Chip
>

 

[rms]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

> It' an Athlon XP 2600+ Barton running at 2.2 GHz (up from 1.9GHz)

I've been running a 1700+ at 2.4ghz @ 1.9v for a year now. I suspect
major longevity factors include the quality of the motherboard power
regulation circuitry, as well as that of the psu, to prevent power spikes
into the cpu, rather than simply the running temperature.

rms

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"rms" wrote
> I've been running a 1700+ at 2.4ghz @ 1.9v for a year now.


Hi, rms,

can I ask what type of CPu you have, as I just picked up a 1700+ but its an
older *Palomino* type (AX1700DMT3C).

What stepping is yours?

Wayne ][

 

[chip]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Wayne Youngman" <waynes.spamtrap@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:41b6f2e3$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> "rms" wrote
>> I've been running a 1700+ at 2.4ghz @ 1.9v for a year now.
>
>
> Hi, rms,
>
> can I ask what type of CPu you have, as I just picked up a 1700+ but its
> an older *Palomino* type (AX1700DMT3C).
>
> What stepping is yours?
>
> Wayne ][

Wayne, I don't mean to ruin your day, but I hope you didn't pay too much for
that CPU. The Palominos were terrible overclockers and I don't think you'll
get much more than an extra 100MHz out of it.

Chip

 

[rms]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

> can I ask what type of CPu you have, as I just picked up a 1700+ but its
> an older *Palomino* type (AX1700DMT3C).

AXDA1700DLT3C
JIUHB0310WPMW

I really have an urge to get a mobilebarton 2600+ to experiment with.
Anyone want my 1700+ for $40? Runs equally well at 10.5x230fsb@1.9v
or 5x100@1.175v for underclocking!!

rms

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Chip" wrote

> Wayne, I don't mean to ruin your day, but I hope you didn't pay too much
> for that CPU. The Palominos were terrible overclockers and I don't think
> you'll get much more than an extra 100MHz out of it.

Hi Chip,

hehe thats funny, your not *ruining* my day, I just bought a load of 2nd
hand AMD kit to play about with. I now have seven computers!!

Just wanted to cover an area which I missed out on, as I already built
several ATHLON machines with Bartons, and my personal rigs are a couple of
P4 Northwoods (2.6Ghz @ 3GHz - 2.8GHz @ 3.5GHz).

If some of these chips give me a little more MHz than great, but I think
they will be just fine running at stock. Just been testing the slowest one
first. . .and its no slouch!!!

AX1700DMT3C
M: 1.75v
T: 90°C
C: 266MHz-FSB


AXDA1800DUT3C
U: 1.6v
T: 90c
C: 266MHz-FSB


AX2000DMT3C
M: 1.75v
T: 90°C
C: 266MHz-FSB


AXDA2200DKV3C
K: 1.65V
V: 85°C
C: 266MHz-FSB

I still didn't set-up a decent test bed to experiment with these things, atm
using an old Leadtek nForce 415-D mobo, will probably pick up a little old
ABIT NF7 so I can push a higher FSB through them. . . .

Wayne ][

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"rms" wrote

> AXDA1700DLT3C
> JIUHB0310WPMW

So that would be a *low* end T-Bred running 1.5vCore with a 266Mhz default
FSB

I don't think I seen an *L* voltage T-Bred yet?

Wayne ][

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:26:04 +0000, Wayne Youngman wrote:

> AXDA1800DUT3C
> U: 1.6v
> T: 90c
> C: 266MHz-FSB
>
> I still didn't set-up a decent test bed to experiment with these things,
> atm using an old Leadtek nForce 415-D mobo, will probably pick up a
> little old ABIT NF7 so I can push a higher FSB through them. . . .
>
You may already know this, but this ones probably a Tbred B core and will
be the fastest of the bunch.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Wes Newell" wrote
>> AXDA1800DUT3C
>> U: 1.6v
>> T: 90c
>> C: 266MHz-FSB
> You may already know this, but this ones probably a Tbred B core and will
> be the fastest of the bunch.


Cheers Wes,

kinda had a hunch, but thanks anyway.

It was the cheapest of the bunch as well!!

Wayne ][