Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)
In article <bs8a21t60quoeijbtkbhu25u6759cm8rkc@4ax.com>, 1@2.com.au
says...
>
>
> AMD 64 3500 Vs Amd 4000 which is best ?
>
>
> I know the 4000 comes with 1 meg of cache. But does that make it any
> faster. If your overclock the 3500 to 4000 speed. Is the 4000 any
> faster ?
You could probably o/c the 4000+, but for the price difference
you could buy a 3500+ <Winchester> and overclock it as well, maybe
even farther than 4000+ if you by a decent m/b and memory, since
there's 512K less cache to generate heat.
I'd take the difference in money and put it towards a good graphics
card. Which is exactly what I did, an MSI 6600GT video card.
3500+ presently running at 2497MHz with 1Gig of Mushkin PC4000 running
in sync on an Abit AV8 3rd Eye. I've had it higher but then I have to
raise the cpu voltage to 1.5 and it gets a bit warm <58C> playing
games. I'm going to cut a whole in the side of the case to vent all
that hot air coming off the video card and cool off the case some.
>
> Thanks. Would like the 4000 but the price is not what i like >
> Thanks again.
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.