Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (
More info?)
"Wes Newell" <w.newell@TAKEOUTverizon.net> wrote in message
news
an.2005.05.06.07.50.45.467973@TAKEOUTverizon.net...
> On Fri, 06 May 2005 01:51:50 +0000, Felger Carbon wrote:
>
> > There is an almost identical version of the TR2-M3 made for the
K8.
> > It's the TR2-M6, and Newegg carries it, too. The main difference
is
> > the mounting. Fan is the same, heat sink size the same.
> >
> Yep, I've got a TR2-M6 too, and there a big difference in the copper
base
> compared the the M1 or M3 for the K7. The M6 cools about the same as
the
> K8 stock cooler, only quieter, so it's not as big a difference where
the
> M1 and M3 cool a lot better than the stock K7 cooler. For the K8,
the
> stock HS is actually a little better than the M6 IMO. That's why I
just
> replaced the fan on the stock cooler and continue to use it on my
A64
> system.
The stock cooler does a better job of cooling and also (sigh) a better
job of producing noise. I just bought a Sempron 2600+ 754, and it has
such low power that the M6 and its low noise is preferable to the
stock cooler with its higher rpm 70mm fan.
Unlike socket A HSFs, where a small die must be cooled, the job of a
K8 HSF is to cool a relatively huge IHS (integrated heat spreader).
For this large-area load, the copper base plate is almost irrelevant;
I think it's there for marketing, not cooling, reasons.
I almost wish my new Palermo chip consumed more power so I had an
excuse to mount an A2013 92mm fan on my TR2-M6 HSF. ;-)