Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)
"signmeuptoo" <signmeuptoo_no_spam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1fz0n3k2kxhje$.s3swf4bx3zjr$.dlg@40tude.net...
> So guys, how well is the overclocking of the Venice and the San Diego
> stacking up against previous socket 939 CPUs working out?
>
> I hear claims that the Venice doesn't overclock as well, is that true?
> Please say it ain't so, joe.
From what I've read (can't remember which forum etc - sorry) the venice core
CPU's are more overclocker friendly than the Winchesters - something to do
with a slightly different/better memory controller.
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)
"signmeuptoo" <signmeuptoo_no_spam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1fz0n3k2kxhje$.s3swf4bx3zjr$.dlg@40tude.net...
> So guys, how well is the overclocking of the Venice and the San Diego
> stacking up against previous socket 939 CPUs working out?
>
> I hear claims that the Venice doesn't overclock as well, is that true?
> Please say it ain't so, joe.
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)
"signmeuptoo" <signmeuptoo_no_spam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1fz0n3k2kxhje$.s3swf4bx3zjr$.dlg@40tude.net...
> So guys, how well is the overclocking of the Venice and the San Diego
> stacking up against previous socket 939 CPUs working out?
>
> I hear claims that the Venice doesn't overclock as well, is that true?
> Please say it ain't so, joe.
Don't know about previous AMD64's, but my 3200+ Venice is running great at
2.7Ghz @ 1.45v, 33c idle 40c load. Impressed me!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.