Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (
More info?)
I overclocked a friend's 3200-64 to 2450 from 2000MHz. I increased the
voltage from 1.4V to 1.55V for the CPU, increased the RAM voltage by 0.2V,
as required by one of the DIMMs, increased the chipset voltage by 0.1V and
dropped the HTL to 4x and the RAM to 166MHz because one of the RAM modules
is a cheapie. That was on a Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 board and using the
standard AMD heatsink and fan. Unless running at 100%, the CPU temp is
about 3C above room temp due to CnQ. Running Prime95 and converting an AVI
to DVD I got the CPU to 44C in a room temp of 25C.
Dave
"Bushy" <ex(underscore)boss@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:j_2Ge.65146$oJ.14779@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> I just started tweaking the new system today. A venice 3200 on an msi k8n
> neo4 platinum with pc3200 corsair generic memory. In about 20 minutes i
> had it up from standrad 2000mhz to 2400mhz, with a very small increase in
> temps, and that is with the standard amd supplied HSF. When i get the
> chance, i'll aim for 2600mhz, but it has to be rock solid stable.
>
> So, in response to the OP, i'd say go the 3200. It'll be cheaper by heaps,
> and as wes points out, with a bit of skill and especially paying attention
> to the memory divider, anyone can get a decent overclock out of a venice.
>
>
> "Wes Newell" <w.newell@TAKEOUTverizon.net> wrote in message
> news
an.2005.07.26.21.28.31.271422@TAKEOUTverizon.net...
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:18:58 +0200, Flow wrote:
>>
>>> So what you are telling is that a venice 3000 clocks 1000mhz higher
>>> opposed
>>> to the 2800mhz a xp3800 will do?
>>
>> No. I'm saying they will both clock to about the same top speed as long
>> as
>> they are the same model core. if the 3800+ venice will hit 2700MHz, a
>> 3000+ venice will also hit 2700MHz. You just have to set the system bus
>> faster because of the lower multiplier.
>>
>>> Ofcourse when multiplier is unlocked for higher ones i pressume.You can
>>> be right there.
>>> But can a venice be unlocked for the higher multies?
>>>
>> No, and there's no need to. Raise the FSB. Multiplier x FSB = CPU clock
>> speed.
>>
>>> In any case,i was telling (as you can read in my post) about the novice
>>> overclockers.
>>> They grab 200/300 mhz.
>>> I also spoke about the experienced overclockers. I have read someone
>>> clocking an a64 upto 3600mhz.
>>>
>> Not on a standard setup. Maybe with power mods and liquid nitrogen
>> cooling. But that still sounds too high.
>>
>>> No need to say this can only be achieved by experienced ppl. And as what
>>> i said,this is simply the truth,for the novice overclockers. they get in
>>> trouble when going over 300mhz.
>>
>> Anyone with a little common sense should be able to clock it up close the
>> max. It's not that hard. Raise vcore, raise multiplier and/or fsb clock.
>> Raising the fsb is where most people get into trouble, but it's really
>> simple too as long as one realizes how it affects the other system buses.
>> While all those so called experts couldn't get the FSB up over about
>> 220MHz on the older chipsets I set mine to 233 the first time without any
>> problems. Of course I knew what was going to happen when I raised it that
>> high and adjusted the other buses accordingly. Booted first time, no
>> problem.
>>
>> --
>> KT133 MB, CPU @2400MHz (24x100): SIS755 MB CPU @2330MHz (10x233)
>> Need good help? Provide all system info with question.
>> My server
http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
>> Verizon server
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
>>
>
>