FX 53

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

How does it rate to the newer 3800 and up?

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

so a 4000+ is an FX 53? are they price comparable??


"Cuzman" <cuzNOSPAM@supanet.com> wrote in message
newsfga6t$7g0$1@news.freedom2surf.net...
> news_reader wrote:
>
> " How does it rate to the newer 3800 and up? "
>
>
> They re-badged it as the 4000+ when they released the FX-55.
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

so the FX 53 can be overclocked better than the 4000+??

"Augustus" <augustus@wrtt.net> wrote in message
news:y%2Te.225954$HI.119160@edtnps84...
>
> "news_reader" <news_reader@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:_pudndWhtbszNoHeRVn-oQ@rogers.com...
>> so a 4000+ is an FX 53? are they price comparable??
>>
>
> No...if you find a retailer with an FX53, they won't be asking 4000+
> prices for it. The FX53 is multiplier unlocked, while the 4000+ is locked.
> That's basically the only difference.
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

yes, it can be overclocked further. Especially if you got water cooling or
one of those refridgerator jobbies.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

I was under the impression the 4000+ was also unlocked for lower and upper
multiplier.
However,the difference is in the core.So you have to look which type you
want.

"news_reader" <news_reader@rogers.com> schreef in bericht
news:XsednZ2dnZ0IpVDynZ2dnaMGgN6dnZ2dRVn-zJ2dnZ0@rogers.com...
> great information gentlemen, thank you..
>
> "Carl" <me@theworld.universe> wrote in message
> newsfjod8$po6$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
> > yes, it can be overclocked further. Especially if you got water cooling
or
> > one of those refridgerator jobbies.
> >
>
>