Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (
More info?)
dmac wrote:
> could get real adventurous and contact award bios for a new bios chip to
> allow oC also.
> always been to afraid to try that on my dell 4500
A new BIOS won't make the hardware suddenly capable of things it can't do.
BTW, Award licenses the core code and development tools for a developer to
then create motherboard specific BIOSes for their products but 'they',
Award, don't have motherboard specific BIOSes to sell you.
> "David Maynard" <dmayn@ev1.net> wrote in message
> news:1090h8o3m04jp26@corp.supernews.com...
> Andy wrote:
>
>>G'day,
>>I got a Dell Dimension 2400 (Celeron 2.4)
>>*No, I didn't pay for it, it was a gift*
>>
>>However, this is what Dell Says about it:
>>
>>Intel Celeron 2.4Ghz Processor
>>128KB ON-DIE L2 Cache
>>This Processor has a 400Mhz Front Side Bus
>>
>>256MB 333Mhz DDR (Memory performs at 266Mhz with a 400Mhz Front Side Bus)
>>
>>Does anyone know if there a way I can get the Memory to perform at 333Mhz
>
> on
>
>>this shitty Mobo?
>
>
> The short answer is no.
>
> For a little background, though, Dell model numbers denote more a 'class'
> of machine (for a market segment. In this case "value PC") rather than a
> specific one. Your "Dell Dimension 2400", for example, is available with
> celeron processors from 2 to 2.7 GHz (400MHz FSB) and P4s from 2.2 (400MHz
> FSB) to 3.06 (533 MHz FSB). You need their "Service Tag Number" to know
> exactly what you've got.
>
> The good news is that you could probably put a 3.0g Gig P4 in it as Dell's
> "Technical Specifications" for the "Dell™ Dimension™ 2400 Series" says
> that's an Intel 845GV chipset and supports a 533 MHz FSB, and
> hyperthreading, but you'd need to check what really IS in your system
> because it's possible for them to use different motherboards (just like
> they do with processors).
>
> As a general rule, store bought machines are intended to be run as they are
> designed and don't provide 'overclock' features for you to run them OTHER
> than as designed. So, for the memory, the thing is, with a maximum system
> clock of 133Mhz that's the maximum clock for the memory. I.E. DDR: 133 x2=
> 266MHz. You also wouldn't gain much, if anything, by running it 'faster'
> since the FSB (for your Celeron) is 400MHz. I.E. You can't pump data
> through the FSB any faster than that so getting it 'faster' from memory TO
> the FSB doesn't get it into the processor any faster. Although there might
> be some benefits to simultaneous AGP, PCI, and processor memory access but
> it's a moot point as there isn't a clock available to run it any faster.
>
> If you're the adventurous type, and technically inclined, you could try
> wire tricks (jumpering CPU pins) to force the celeron into requesting a
> 533MHz FSB, and a higher core voltage, but there's no guarantee it'll hit
> 3.2 Gig.
>
>
>>Or do I have to gut this machine and rob it for all its parts and buy anew
>>motherboard?
>
>
>
> It's a "value PC" with everything integrated into the motherboard. In
> effect, there isn't anything you can 'rob'.
>
>
>
>
>