Some memory questions

[slacker]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

I've been reading up lately in preparation for buying a new system, but
there are a lot of things you are apprently just supposed to know already. I
suspect I know the answer to some of these already, but just in case...

Are all P4 800Mhz processors dual channel?

Does dual channel memory have to be installed in pairs? If so, does the
memory have to be 'paired' to work effectively?

Does lower latency memory help automatically, or must some settings be
changed in BIOS?

What is registered memory?

What is the approximate performance penalty for using ECC (in percentages)?

I've read a couple of times that lower CAS and RAS latencies make memory
access quicker, but don't increase bandwidth. How can lower latencies not
lead to higher bandwidths?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

> Does dual channel memory have to be installed in pairs? If so, does the
> memory have to be 'paired' to work effectively?

No and no.

> Does lower latency memory help automatically, or must some settings be
> changed in BIOS?

As far as I know the BIOS should detect this and set it automatically.

> What is registered memory?

I don't know the specifics but I think some mobos require it.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

Slacker wrote:

> I've been reading up lately in preparation for buying a new system, but
> there are a lot of things you are apprently just supposed to know already. I
> suspect I know the answer to some of these already, but just in case...
>
> Are all P4 800Mhz processors dual channel?

'Dual channel' is a function of how the chipset handles memory, not the
processor.


> Does dual channel memory have to be installed in pairs?

Yes, or else there's only one channel.

> If so, does the
> memory have to be 'paired' to work effectively?

They have to be 'paired' in that they must be the same size and have the
same characteristics but they do not have to be pre 'matched' by the
seller, although that should certainly remove any 'doubt' about it.


> Does lower latency memory help automatically, or must some settings be
> changed in BIOS?

The BIOS should read the SPD on the memory module and set it accordingly
(meaning automatically).


> What is registered memory?

'Registered' means there is are registers (buffers) on the memory module
between the actual RAM and the data bus. That allows more memory modules to
be on the bus (each module adds a 'load' and the register can drive a
larger load than the bare memory can) but it also introduces a delay (has
to propagate through the register) so they will generally not clock as fast.


> What is the approximate performance penalty for using ECC (in percentages)?

Like most things it depends on what you're doing but the bigger hit, about
15%, comes from registered (which ECC will most likely be too). Take a look
here:

http://www.2cpu.com/articles/44_1.html

Frankly, I doubt either are justified on a home PC.

>
> I've read a couple of times that lower CAS and RAS latencies make memory
> access quicker, but don't increase bandwidth. How can lower latencies not
> lead to higher bandwidths?

You're thinking of 'how fast is the whole ball of wax' but they're being
'technical' and using 'bandwidth' to mean the burst data rate (which is
what the BIG NUMBERS on the box refer to, e.g. PC3200 [Mbytes/sec]) and
latency to be how long it takes before a 'burst' can occur. None of the
memory types can actually do a continuous data stream at the burst rate
everyone sees on the box: it's 'make-request, wait, burst-data-set,
make-request, wait, burst-data-set', etc.

 

[Jason]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

"Slacker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
newsYidnXK1mow_iErd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
> I've been reading up lately in preparation for buying a new system, but
> there are a lot of things you are apprently just supposed to know already.
I
> suspect I know the answer to some of these already, but just in case...
>
> Are all P4 800Mhz processors dual channel?
>
> Does dual channel memory have to be installed in pairs? If so, does the
> memory have to be 'paired' to work effectively?
>
> Does lower latency memory help automatically, or must some settings be
> changed in BIOS?
>
> What is registered memory?

I don't know if what I'm saying is 100% correct, but I think registered
memory is mostly used with 64bit processors.
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/registered_memory.html
http://www.tacktech.com/display.cfm?ttid=62

>
> What is the approximate performance penalty for using ECC (in
percentages)?
>
> I've read a couple of times that lower CAS and RAS latencies make memory
> access quicker, but don't increase bandwidth. How can lower latencies not
> lead to higher bandwidths?
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

Sorry for the delay, many days benching my new memory...

About your doubts...


On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:06:41 -0500, "Slacker" <nowhere@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>I've been reading up lately in preparation for buying a new system, but
>there are a lot of things you are apprently just supposed to know already. I
>suspect I know the answer to some of these already, but just in case...
>
>Are all P4 800Mhz processors dual channel?

Not exactely. What makes dual channel capability is the motherboard
chipset.
>
>Does dual channel memory have to be installed in pairs? If so, does the
>memory have to be 'paired' to work effectively?

Yes, and it's better.
>
>Does lower latency memory help automatically, or must some settings be
>changed in BIOS?

Normally SPD put some conservative timmings into memory when in
automatic. It's better in the first boot to let the board "choose" the
best timmings, and then, change them accordingly our "needs".

>
>What is registered memory?

Look in a search engine for a more techincal explanations, but in
short is a slower memory because it has a safety mecanism to check if
data is well used and not getting corrupted. Best suited for servers
or critical data computers, mas can work on most PC if the motherboard
accepts it.

>
>What is the approximate performance penalty for using ECC (in percentages)?
>
>I've read a couple of times that lower CAS and RAS latencies make memory
>access quicker, but don't increase bandwidth. How can lower latencies not
>lead to higher bandwidths?
>
Directely no, but improves system response time. At the same fsb, the
slower the timmings, the better

-------------------------------------------------------
Stormgiant

Asus P4P800-Deluxe
NW3000@3915 FSB261 on WC
512MB OCZ BH-5 @DDR522 2-2-2-5
Power Color ATi 9800XT 518/408