Athlon 64 3000+ vs 3200+

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

Asking for opinions/experience on which would be the best value
overclocker, and why.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

Dan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have the 3000+ chip and it is overclocked to 2.3Ghz. I know the chip is
> capable of more but my motherboard and memory is limiting it as its at
> 255FSB I think.

Did you try a lower memory multiplier?

>
> I would say go for the 3200+ if its not much more because it has a higher
> multiplier and you are less likely to reach the Max stable FSB on your
> motherboard.

That's precisely the tradeoff I've been wondering about.

>
> Dan
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking (More info?)

TonyC wrote:
> "David Maynard" <nospam@private.net> wrote in message
> news:11b8i4r2t53d4a9@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>Asking for opinions/experience on which would be the best value
>>overclocker, and why.
>
>
> 3200+ has everything the 3000+ has, plus a higher multiplier. 10x instead
> of 9x worth the difference? I'd say yes, I bought 3200+ Venice.

The thing missing from your logic tree, there, is why you consider a
'higher multiplier' to be of more value.


> Tony
>
>