Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt (
More info?)
kony wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:10:56 -0500, David Maynard
> <dNOTmayn@ev1.net> wrote:
>
>
>>James wrote:
>>
>>>How hot do the old 466 celeron chips run?
>>
>>They'll get as hot as you want, depending on the heatsink.
>>
>>
>>>I have an old HP pavilion 8543C
>>>(Walmart Special) that I would like to run 24/7 as a file
>>>server/webcam/jukebox,etc. Only problem is the CPU fan sounds like a dentist
>>>drill (and has since the thing was new). I know I can buy a "quiet fan" but
>>>I really don't want to spend any money on the thing. Would it fry itself if
>>>I disconnected the fan?
>>
>>No, it won't fry itself because the internal thermal shutdown till lock it
>>up when it over heats, which it will without adequate cooling.
>
Woops, typo up there. Meant "will" lock it up, not "till"
> IIRC, there was no internal thermal shutdown feature till
> Coppermine, 500(A) MHz.
P-IIs and PPGA celerons have on-die thermal diodes and internal thermal
shutdown.
The main point was it needs a fan.
>>The thermal design power for a 466 Celeron is 27 watts. That's as much as a
>>1 gig tualatin and requires active cooling, meaning a heatsink and fan.
>>
>>The comments about Dells 'not using a CPU fan' are misleading. They simply
>>have the fan mounted on the case wall instead of directly on the heatsink.
>>But it works in a similar manner; meaning something, e.g. a fan, to move
>>air over the CPU heatsink.
>
>
> True, multiple OEMs had similar arrangement which could be
> duplicated by crafting a shroud and attaching to PSU lower
> intake, around good passive 'sink. @ 466MHz it might run a
> tad undervolted too, but no way to know if motherboard
> supports it.