Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt (
More info?)
I have an EVGA 5900 for $110 U.S. $5 shipping. headon@att.net. Very nice
card. Faster than the 9700pro, almost as fast as the 9800pro. Nvidia cards
generally have less driver problems than ATI cards so even though the latest
gen ATIs are slightly faster than nvidia' I'll be sticking to Nvidia.
"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eih881l8as2p5g3rp1nb4rrggq1hfu3sji@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 23:53:15 -0600, "GS"
> <basil@access4less.net> wrote:
>
> >Looking to replace my old geforce 5200 on my 3000xp kt400 system. Which
of
> >these cards would be the best? Need to use it for Internet Word
Processing
> >and some new 3d Games(Rome Total War/Sims 2)at a resolution of at least
> >1024x748.
>
> There have been some deals on Radeon 9800 Pro for around
> $140, that'd be the best in that price range. If you can go
> up to ~$160 I suggest a Geforce 6600 GT.
>
> FX5900 is very fast at DX8 but not a good buy for DX9/modern
> stuff, not at the price-point it still has online at least,
> YMMV if you find deals elsewhere. R9700 Pro only if the
> price is low enough, it should play the two games you
> menitoned fine but IMO, usually it's not much cheaper than
> the R9800 Pro or 6600GT and their performance is a
> reasonable increase for the cost. Regular R89800/SE is a
> notch below all the aforementioned cards.
>
> I'm a bit surprised the 5200 won't play those two games
> though, at least at 1024x768 but then IIRC there are also
> multiple grades of FX5200.