Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt (
More info?)
Ditto
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:15:01 -0500, David Maynard <nospam@private.net>
wrote:
>kony wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:23:24 GMT, Timbertea
>> <timbusenet@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>smilyface wrote:
>>>
>>>>hi, I just bought 512 mb of pc 133 ram for my computer which has 2
>>>>slots that had 2x 64 mb of pc 100 ram. When I install 512 mb of pac
>>>>133 ram it does not work? What is the problem? Do I need to buy Pc
>>>>100 ram and that should work or should the pc 133 work or how can i
>>>>make it work? I am running windows xp. I donno know what mother
>>>>board I have but it has an intel celeron 500 mhz processor. What can
>>>>I do to make the ram work?
>>>>
>>>
>>>There are a couple possibly culprits here....
>>>
>>>The PC133 you bought may not be backwards compatable with PC100 (which I
>>>expect a 500mhz process either runs at 5x100 or 9x66 and doesn't use
>>>PC133 at all). Many brands (such as PNY) dropped backawards
>>>compatability a long time ago.
>>
>>
>> Celeron 500 ran at 7.5 x 66.
>> Some boards (like Intel 810 w/integrated video) might run
>> memory bus at 100MHz. Either way, (or with another chipset)
>> typical low-density PC100 should work.
>>
>>
>>>The density of the ram could be wrong for your system. Most systems that
>>>old require 16x8 layouts. Most of the new ram sold is high density 4
>>>chip. Older memory controllers (like the 810, 440 series) just can't
>>>deal with this stuff. They see maybe half of it on a good day, and some
>>>setups don't see it at all.
>>
>>
>> True, that is the far most likely problem. However, it's
>> also quite possible the system can't take 512MB per slot,
>> that it has BOTH of these limitations.
>
>Being a celeron 500 system (likely an 810/810E) it's a good guess it has
>both limitations but since he said simply "bought 512 meg" and mentioned 2
>slots I presumed he got two 256 meg sticks.
>
>>
>>
>> A [256MB of PC100] module would be a good next-attempt.