19" or 20" LCD Monitors

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?

 

[eLJay]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:58:52 GMT, "Wooducoodu"
<wooducoodu@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?
>

How about 12ms?
http://www6.tomshardware.com/display/20040413/index.html



and here are your 16ms ones:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/display/20040326/index.html

Enjoy!

el

 

[martin]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

eljay wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:58:52 GMT, "Wooducoodu"
> <wooducoodu@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?
>>
>
> How about 12ms?
> http://www6.tomshardware.com/display/20040413/index.html
>
>
>
> and here are your 16ms ones:
> http://www6.tomshardware.com/display/20040326/index.html
>
> Enjoy!
>
> el

El,

None of the 19" and above monitors in these reviews have a response time
below 20ms...

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

Sharp makes a nice 19" with 16ms response time. I can't remember the model
number but costco.com sells it.

--Dan

"Wooducoodu" <wooducoodu@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:w7Ofc.123$zG5.15@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
> Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?
>
>

 

[eLJay]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

Ah, I guess I jumped the gun on that one.

My bad.

>
>El,
>
>None of the 19" and above monitors in these reviews have a response time
>below 20ms...
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

Wooducoodu wrote:

>Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?

Planar claims 15 ms (Ton), 10ms (Toff) response time for their
PL201M (20.1") display.

I don't know how to interpret "Ton" and "Toff". The "on" and "off"
part seems obvious, but I'm not sure what the relative significance of
the two figures is.

R,
Tom Q.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

i'm pretty sure that one is just a way of making 25ms (15+10) sound better
than it is.

"Tom Quackenbush" <tquacken@kingcon.com> wrote in message
news74180dqo53mhksog0ua620nk4ha7qd62k@4ax.com...
> Wooducoodu wrote:
>
> >Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?
>
> Planar claims 15 ms (Ton), 10ms (Toff) response time for their
> PL201M (20.1") display.
>
> I don't know how to interpret "Ton" and "Toff". The "on" and "off"
> part seems obvious, but I'm not sure what the relative significance of
> the two figures is.
>
> R,
> Tom Q.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt (More info?)

In article <ccWfc.52056$ds6.42726@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>,
"dg" <dan_gus@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Sharp makes a nice 19" with 16ms response time. I can't remember the model
> number but costco.com sells it.
>
> --Dan


It's called the LL-191A. There's a review of it at
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=2055.


> "Wooducoodu" <wooducoodu@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:w7Ofc.123$zG5.15@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
> > Are there any yet that have a response time of 16ms?