Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Aaron goes for the U hi-score, .99u10 is out!

Last response: in Video Games
Share
September 12, 2005 8:17:09 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

0.99u10
-------


Source Changes
--------------
Fixed bug in INP recording that crashed MAME. [Aaron Giles]

Added some small optimizations to the Namco System 22 3D renderer.
[Aaron Giles]

Fixed interrupt problem in the M37710 core that caused problems with
the
recent Namco update. [Aaron Giles]

Fixes to the recent Namco sound update: [R. Belmont]
* Fixed incorrect voices in System 11/12 games
* Fixed swapped stereo in System 11/12 games
* Fixed missing sound in Namco Classics games

Added conditional DIP switches to 10 Yard Fight driver. [Curt Coder]

Added and wired up color PROM for Truco Clemente, but still missing a
transform. [Roberto Fresca]



New games added or promoted from NOT_WORKING status
---------------------------------------------------
Monsters World [David Haywood]



New clones added
----------------
Surprise Attack (World Ver. K) [Corrado Tomaselli]
Power Instinct 2 (Japan) [EGCG]
Chuugokuryuu II (ver. 100J, Japan) [EGCG]

More about : aaron score 99u10

Anonymous
September 12, 2005 8:17:10 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:

>0.99u10
>-------

so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
Any takers?
September 12, 2005 8:17:11 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

PRoToCoL wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>>0.99u10
>>-------
>
>
> so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
> Any takers?

I predict it will level off at u10 and .100 will be out RealSoonNow[tm].
Anonymous
September 12, 2005 8:17:11 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

PRoToCoL wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>>0.99u10

> so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
> Any takers?
>

0.99u14?
--
FSogol
Anonymous
September 12, 2005 8:17:12 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

JC's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged through his body were:
> PRoToCoL wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>0.99u10
>>>-------
>> so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
>> Any takers?
> I predict it will level off at u10 and .100 will be out RealSoonNow[tm].
..99u99 before it goes to a .99u99dXX system
September 12, 2005 8:29:22 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

PRoToCoL wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>>0.99u10
>>-------
>
>
> so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
> Any takers?
>

I say 99u12.. Next week with .100 a week after that.

--
MCR
MAME(tm) - History In The Making
www.pleasure-dome.org.uk
September 12, 2005 9:08:11 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:35:52 GMT, PRoToCoL
<protocol@notbloodylikely.co.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>0.99u10
>>-------
>
>so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
>Any takers?

I'll bag .99u11 on Wed then .100 on Friday, both this week.

Troy.
Anonymous
September 12, 2005 9:52:41 PM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

MCR thought about it a bit, then said...
> PRoToCoL wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>0.99u10
> >>-------
> >
> >
> > so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
> > Any takers?
> >
>
> I say 99u12.. Next week with .100 a week after that.

You know, this may be the ultimate solution to the 1.xx vs .1xx
controversy: just keep MAME stuck in .99uxxx mode for the forseable
future.

Always getting closer to 1.0, but never quite making it...

--
Kevin Steele
RetroBlast! Retrogaming News and Reviews
www.retroblast.com
September 13, 2005 1:53:14 AM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

* FSogol Wrote in alt.games.mame:

> PRoToCoL wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>0.99u10
>
>> so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
>> Any takers?
>>
>
> 0.99u14?

99u17 in keeping with the .36b17 jump to .54

--
David
September 13, 2005 2:18:48 AM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Kevin Steele wrote:
> MCR thought about it a bit, then said...
>
>>PRoToCoL wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>0.99u10
>>>>-------
>>>
>>>
>>>so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
>>>Any takers?
>>>
>>
>>I say 99u12.. Next week with .100 a week after that.
>
>
> You know, this may be the ultimate solution to the 1.xx vs .1xx
> controversy: just keep MAME stuck in .99uxxx mode for the forseable
> future.
>
> Always getting closer to 1.0, but never quite making it...
>

I am waiting for MAME 2.0, so I guess I could be waiting a while. :-)

--
MCR
MAME(tm) - History In The Making
www.pleasure-dome.org.uk
September 13, 2005 4:16:54 AM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

http://www.mameworld.net/gurudumps/

12th September, 2005
Holy COW! Jackpot!

I haven't opened them all yet, but as far as I can tell, here's what has
arrived.....
Konami "Thunder Hurricane", thanks to R. Belmont
Psikyo "Taisen Hot Gimmick 4 Ever", thanks to alien_mame
"Minigame Cool Collection" & "Columns III", thanks to f205v
"Tiger Heli" & "Slap Fight" (with 68705s), thanks to Tingoes
Konami "NBA Play By Play", purchase on eBay by Randy


begin 666 DSCN2775_small.JPG
M_]C_X `02D9)1@`!``$!+ $L``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC
M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$`!4.#Q(/#142$1(7%A49'S0B'QT='T N,"8T3$-03TM#
M24A47WEF5%ER6TA):8]J<GV!AXF'4665GY.$GGF%AX(!%A<7'QL?/B(B/H)7
M25>"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"
M@H*"@H*"@O_^`!X"`````@````0```!+`````P````0`````````_\0!H@``
M`04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+`0`#`0$!`0$!`0$!````````
M`0(#! 4&!P@)"@L0``(!`P,"! ,%!00$```!?0$"`P`$$042(3%!!A-180<B
M<10R@9&A""-"L<$54M'P)#-B<H()"A87&!D:) 28G*"DJ-#4V-S@Y.D-$149'
M2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@X2%AH>(B8J2DY25EI>8F9JB
MHZ2EIJ>HJ:JRL[2UMK>XN;K"P\3%QL?(R<K2T]35UM?8V=KAXN/DY>;GZ.GJ
M\?+S]/7V]_CY^A$``@$"! 0#! <%! 0``0)W``$"`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B
M,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O 58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'
M2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$A8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:
MHJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ
M\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\ `$0@`)0`R`P$1``(1`0,1`?_:``P#`0`"$0,1`#\`JK(D
M;%4;<'&,EMWI2*&I<#?C<-WI698Y[DJNY2"<TKA8EM9S<1;R`#G'%6B2:F(,
M4P%Q0!C1P"SE6/S 1DG/Y4 :L.EQR0"X\W&1G[N:2B%Q)-/3[*TD<X8#MLQ1
M*'*"G<CMHS$FW.:!DXH$.I@%`&!"[^9NN/F-2QHT(KYUB\L2-MZ;<=J5VMAV
M0YKAS:M&IX;MCK3<Y2W%RI#;:7:@5E/%""Q;21#_`!4Q$M,!* ,2>-@P8#C%
M2RD.M>'3<*D:+#TBAL66=QZ52)9(013)#S)$Z-3$'VB7U_2@"15'2D,0VZ A
EU^4YZ"DT4F.6`'&6-*P7)$B10<#%4B;W$*@4`1LHH CVB@#_V0``
`
end
Anonymous
September 14, 2005 11:19:54 AM

Archived from groups: alt.games.mame (More info?)

Troy wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:35:52 GMT, PRoToCoL
> <protocol@notbloodylikely.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:09 +0100, Troy <troy@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>0.99u10
>>>-------
>>
>>so how high is this U numbering run going to be taken then
>>Any takers?
>
>
> I'll bag .99u11 on Wed then .100 on Friday, both this week.
>
> Troy.

I say 99u11 this weekend then .100 next week.

--
Super Mike
Ha! Ha! estoy usando la internet!!!1
!