That's all this thread is about.
I like F-Secure since it has 3 scanning engines which enhance protection against any viruses.
Nod 32 is the most solid out of the lot, may not look good but it does the job far better than the others.
NORTON: is ok...I guess....but some virusses have messed my stuff with that
McAFFEE: this IS a virus....I hate that crap, I lost my pc TWICE due to McAfee (virus definitios were up to date), it detected viruses but they were allowed to dance all over my pc
AVAST!: same as McAffee but just one time,+, a friend had the same problem
Kaspersky is probably the best when it comes to definitions. Ask any trojan writer, they'll tell you 1-2 days of release Kaspersky is always the first to pick it up.
I use AVAST, its a native 64bit kernal and thats baller for my xp x64!
i used mcaffe internet security suite for a long time and in my opinion avast is way better.
i do agree Norton misses alot, and mcaffee does a great job of finding the viruses but not cleaning them. i found my self manually deleting alot of stuff thx to mcaffee. avast has been great so far. takes care of those pesky active x controls also.
I use Trend's PCCillin. When setup properly (which isn't hard), you never know it's there. Unlike Norton. My second choice would be Nod 32.
I have never heard of that NOD32 before...i think i will give it a try..im getting sick of norton.
None of these.... read on.....
NORTON is bloated and takes alot of system resources, however SYMANTEC antivirus (without the norton) has been amazing on my system. It has caught all kinds of hijackers, worms, even some adware and spyware.
If you can get the corporate edition I highly recommend it 8)
| Quote : None of these.... read on.....
|
DITTO I have the x64 edition for true 64 bit anitvirus glory.
There's a few there I haven't even heard of.
tbh, I've only tried Norton and McAfee (currently using McAfee), and have so far never had a virus (of course, that may be due to the ineffectiveness of the software). Just a couple of false alarms with Norton (and problems connecting to online games - again with Norton).
I will follow this thread with interest, as I would be interested in switching
I did a lot of research on this topic some time ago because most AVS programs take up a lot of system resources and slow your system down big time.
I ended up selecting NOD32 becasuse it kept your system running fast, it was hardly noticable. There were actual benchies for each program but I've long since lost that research.
But I'm pretty happy with NOD32 and have tried a few others. The latest version of NOD32 actually has a nice interface and looks very professional. It's very customizable for advanced users as well. You can really throttle the program to scan, update and filter just to your needs to further increase overall system performance.
But god help us all stay away from anything NORTON. What a POS company and software. Blech, it's like installing viruses on your own computer! But then soem people like self-torture.
I also like F-Secure, but since I've knowed BitDefender's ability to find viruses I won't change anymore. Once you know BitDefender, you'll get in love with it.
Ohh, i almost forgot. here's a review of the best antivirus programs available and as you all can see, BitDefender is the best.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/
well i use Sophos Anti-virus and never had any problems , i even tried to get a virus by going throw lots of dodgy sites, it picked them up and spat them out..!! great for surfing. 8O
Oh - is Action_Man not online ?
Well, in his absence, I will do the honours....
Get a new keyboard ?
I have a hard time trusting a resource like that though. They very well could be tipping the scales in favor of a certain product. That's not rock-science marketing to do that.
The comparrison also doesn't take into account overall system performance which for hard core gamers and computer nuts like us is pretty important. I'd like to see Toms or another reputable review site do a comparrison from a performance/feature perspective.
I debate even having virus software at times. I know what not to click on and how a person gets viruses. But I guess some viruses are getting tricker so it's better to be safe than sorry.
I don't either because I don't download random crap from weinerpeniswarez.com or use Internet Explorer so it isn't really a problem. Again you guys, email a real trojan writer and ask him what works best at killing his work
Norton is absolute crap and bloatware, and never finds anything -- not because it does a good job of keeping garbage out, no way, it is simply useless! :x
like someone else said, McAffee finds more than Norton (but then, so could anything else
), but is useless for deleting anything.
AVG is what I use, it's definitely better than that Norton and McAffee crap.
I've had really bad experiences with Mcafee + AVG
Thats a start, but facts are preferred. depends on the clients habits as to what they need if any at all, so I vote for whats needed, anything from free AVG to Panda Titanium. Oh, and servers are another story!
i have to agree with the norton haters here!
i read somewhere "dont quote me" that norton sucks up a ridiculous amount of system ram. i wish i could remember the exact number but it was enough for both eyes. 8O
also when i first began working for teh company i do know the main computer we use here had a FULL uinstall of norton antivirus with everything from all the lil utilities to "norton system go back".
total boot time was around 20 mins. there was a time they had no tech here and would power it on and walk away until it was on.
since i threw that norton crap out the window (except "go back" due to OS complications and back ups) the computer runs fine with no lattencies or crazy boot times.
what a hog!
So far AVG has not failed me. However, Norton recently failed not on me, but on one of my friends, allowing his pc to be so overloaded with trojans in one go, that now the pc, even when reformatted, is so unreliable it can be classed as an artform.
Mcafee is a pile of useless donkey crap.
Norton is a pile of useless ram eating donkey crap.
Simple.
Get a free one, theyre just as good anyways, and you can get as many different free A/V programs as you want, as long as only one of 'em is running in the background.
I have manually deleted more viruses than Mcafee has 'deleted'. Within a few days of getting the internet connection with a new and up to date Mcafee program, we got a tonne of viruses. Not only that but I had to manually delete em.
No way am I ever paying for a AV program again.
What on earth makes people pay for programs that are crap, when they could be getting great programs for free.
Clamav + clamwin + AVG + spybot S&D + adaware + *BSD + Linux + Unix ++
| Quote : i have to agree with the norton haters here!
|
Second here.
Norton is crap, and it even gets worst if you try to uninstall it since the d@mn thing is too intrusive with Windows files. I had a horrible experience trying to uninstall Norton 2004 from a friends comp and believe me, it was one hell of a experience since the damn thing corrupted the windows registry and some other important stuff in the windows kernel. I ended up formatting the whole HD which took my work even longer.
As I said before, F-Secure is really a good antivirus program. Just give it a try here:
http://esd.element5.com/demoreg.html?productid=300042689&languageid=1
| Quote : 9-Inch: Ohh, i almost forgot. here's a review of the best antivirus programs available and as you all can see, BitDefender is the best.
|
I really don't know how reliable that source is, but definately F-Secure works for me.
| Quote : i have to agree with the norton haters here!
|
Second here.
Norton is crap, and it even gets worst if you try to uninstall it since the d@mn thing is too intrusive with Windows files. I had a horrible experience trying to uninstall Norton 2004 from a friends comp and believe me, it was one hell of a experience since the damn thing corrupted the windows registry and some other important stuff in the windows kernel. I ended up formatting the whole HD which took my work even longer.
As I said before, F-Secure is really a good antivirus program. Just give it a try here:
http://esd.element5.com/demoreg.html?productid=300042689&languageid=1
| Quote : 9-Inch: Ohh, i almost forgot. here's a review of the best antivirus programs available and as you all can see, BitDefender is the best.
|
I really don't know how reliable that source is, but definately F-Secure works for me.
The fact is, that uber-trojans straight from the programmer's desktop will get by any anti-virus for a fair amount of time unless publicly released. Virus writers also have what's known as packers/binders that will change the tiny pieces of data in a file that virus programs read, which essentially turns any old virus into an undetectable. an anti-virus is only as good as the definitions, and kaspersky by far has the best...
| Quote : i have to agree with the norton haters here!
|
Second here.
Norton is crap, and it even gets worst if you try to uninstall it since the d@mn thing is too intrusive with Windows files. I had a horrible experience trying to uninstall Norton 2004 from a friends comp and believe me, it was one hell of a experience since the damn thing corrupted the windows registry and some other important stuff in the windows kernel. I ended up formatting the whole HD which took my work even longer.
As I said before, F-Secure is really a good antivirus program. Just give it a try here:
http://esd.element5.com/demoreg.html?productid=300042689&languageid=1
| Quote : 9-Inch: Ohh, i almost forgot. here's a review of the best antivirus programs available and as you all can see, BitDefender is the best.
|
I really don't know how reliable that source is, but definately F-Secure works for me.
like i said above, I cant even remove NORTON SYSTEM GO BACK! with out losing everything on the computer. if it werent for important work files on this rig id strip it down faster than adriana lima!
| Quote : The fact is, that uber-trojans straight from the programmer's desktop will get by any anti-virus for a fair amount of time unless publicly released. Virus writers also have what's known as packers/binders that will change the tiny pieces of data in a file that virus programs read, which essentially turns any old virus into an undetectable. an anti-virus is only as good as the definitions, and kaspersky by far has the best...
|
OK, I got it.
Well, to my previous experience, F-Secure does have good file definitions and they upload them 2 or 4 times in a day (depends on new threats).
Some time ago I used AVG 6.0 and I really liked it because it's not a system resource hog, but once it finds viruses "on the fly" (while you're using internet) it can't delete them. That was something really weird since you know your AV is working but it can't delete, heal or rename those viruses once it finds them; also, virus definitions in AVG are not that good and that was the final reason why a change this AV program :?
I've had crap experiences with AVG. It didn't pick anything up (I was certainly infected) when I scanned. The program had a crap interface that..yes, did not allow me to delete the viruses.
This is exacly the problem. We all have experience with maybe 2-3 AVS systems and that's it. So our level of recommendation clout is minimal.
TOMS: Fire up a test of the top 10 AVS programs and then run some benchies for us. Compare: performance, speed, advanced setup, cost, up-to-date definitions etc.
I bet there's a CLEAR winner in this category. And loser (oh yea, we already know Norton wins that one)
They could all be a lot better if they tried to do so. The fact is, the only check a very, very small portion of a file for a signature. You can alter that with a Hex editor. =/
As for speed, you shouldn't be playing Doom and scanning C: at the same time, so who cares? A fast AV is usually a reckless one. BTW, Computer Associates has an AV on newegg.com for $4 and I've tested it and am very impressed
Hi everyone:
Well, I'm new to this forum but I'd like to share my previous experiences with antivirus software:
We all know Norton is a bad performer and it consumes alot of system resources. AVG is a good performing antivirus and it's free, no other antivirus software would beat that but it has a strange behaviour once it finds viruses, specially if you P2P a lot it does find them but "sometimes" it doesn't delete them the way you'd like.
That's all I wanted to say.
| Quote : I also like F-Secure, but since I've knowed BitDefender's ability to find viruses I won't change anymore. Once you know BitDefender, you'll get in love with it.
|
theres loads of reviews like this and they all come up with different answers. depends when it was done and how it was tested the last one i read it was Norton at the top lol.
i use avg very good and doesnt bloat the system. i would use norton corporate edition since thats reported to be much better than plain norton.
I've had way to much free time on many cleans and tried various products, and like most other programs you have to know how to work each program to get what it is capable of, and yes some are still lacking. Up until around 2003 Norton was Ok, then they really fell behind and I couldn't recomend them anymore. But for those of you still using it, before you run a scan go into what is excluded and remove everything, because most of the problems write themselves into the exclude's. Similar rules for most of the other products. And most cannot clean a proccess if it is running, so safemode then scan etc....
Norton has always worked fine for me. Then again, I use the corporate version and i know the "uninstall password" lolz
| Quote : I also like F-Secure, but since I've knowed BitDefender's ability to find viruses I won't change anymore. Once you know BitDefender, you'll get in love with it.
|
theres loads of reviews like this and they all come up with different answers. depends when it was done and how it was tested the last one i read it was Norton at the top lol.
i use avg very good and doesnt bloat the system. i would use norton corporate edition since thats reported to be much better than plain norton.
It is..it comes with my IBM school image. TAKES NO RESOURCES AT ALL WHO WOULD BELIEVE THAT
im using Symantec (norton same thing) Anvitivur Corporate - server and client setup and i must say its the quickest AV iv seen in ages.
Hm, that ranking site of AV's put ALL AV'S AT 5/5 FOR EFFECTIVENESS OMFGWTFBBQ
Action man is a cock
bloody sheep
my fav one? ... my brain. I dont run virus software.
I find it much easier to watch where I go online, keep windows updated, dont click on stuff "just to make it go away", and use a router between the net and my PCs.
much cheaper too. Dont have to deal with updates, installing the stuff, uninstalling the stuff when it doesnt work.. etc.
Kaspersky & E-Trust
| Quote : my fav one? ... my brain. I dont run virus software.
|
i did this for bout 4 years, and never had a problem i still dont have a problem but after chipping out 1300 quid on a pc i feel safer having a AV.
NOD32 is the best anti-virus application, i use it for more than 6 months and i never had problems
p.s.
norton anti-virus is the worst antivirus application i ever had!
| Quote :
|
huh okay.. something to be said for peace of mind though.
I was thinking about this idea:
Why not try the effectiveness of our antivirus programs??
WARNING: DO NOT TRY TO OPEN THIS WEBSITE IF YOU'RE RUNNING YOUR SYSTEM WITHOUT AN ANTIVIRUS.
Just open this website which is full of viruses, malware, spyware, etc. and try downloading any file:
www.andr.net
I was kind of fearful to open that site, but after thinking it HARD
, I did it.
My antivirus (BitDefender) stopped all of them (3 in total) immediately and I'm not using a firewall. Once I downloaded one of those files, the antivirus asked me what I wanted to do so I clicked "delete file" which it did whit no fuss.
What a nice exercise sexbomb. Some might say it's a stupid idea, but now I see the benefits of having a good antivirus solution.
Norton is the best AV hands down.
I'm currently using F-Secure antivirus 2006 which it found 2 potential viruses even before downloading the files. After downloading a file, I chose to "delete" and it did it with no problems at all.
Let's see what the AVG guys have to say about that.
| Quote : None of these.... read on.....
|
I must agree with DBnimble. Symantec corprate version is very good. But I also run a second AV/Utility program called SystemSuite made by Vcom. That there is a great program.
I hqd so,e proble,s with ,y keyboqrd, but I think it's solved noz,
greetw
Hi. I just uninstalled norton Av 2005. checking out different free AV's I read 'bout Avira Antivirus Personal Edition, and Avast! antivirus. Of them, I installed avira. I've been running it for a while, and I do feel my computer more responsive than with norton.
How good is avira?
There are 1952 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
