Archived from groups: comp.infosystems.gis,alt.satellite.gps,comp.periphs.printers,rec.photo.digital (
More info?)
I just bought a HP 1055cm Plus. I settled on this model because of the
Paper handling (Multi-roll Feeder). Further opinions expressed below:
"Eric Peterson" <lastname_nospam@heritage.nv.gov> wrote in message
news:RaF2d.4393$Qv5.1301@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> I have to make a decision between an epson 9600 plotter (with network
card)
> in my office, or co-purchasing an hp 1055cm (with 2gb hard disk and
extended
> warrantee) with another office. Neither of our offices process so much
that
> there would be conflict in using the printer. I'm looking for any
thoughts
> or opinions on these printers.
>
> To help stir-up some ideas, here are my premature opinions:
>
> 1. Both options cost us about the same (full price of the epson or half
> price of the hp).
>
> 2. Our printing is mainly maps, but often involving satellite imagery, and
> occasional landscape photos, so sharp, clear, high resolution prints are
of
> some interest, though absolute color precision (such as in professional
> photography) is not a big deal.
IMHO Epson Plotter had better output than the HP
>
> 3. Since we are a small office without opportunities to upgrade, or even
> repair, expensive equipment often, reliability and durability are also a
> factor.
I haven't had the plotter long enough to comment on durability, but on
initial impression, the HP seems ruggedly built (Esp. compared to the HP
750C that it replaced)
>
> 4. One might think that since the hp is a more expensive printer, it
should
> be a better and more durable printer...?
>
????
> 5. We currently have an old, hp 755cm - its problems with detecting
> cartridge placement, and having printing errors 3/4 of the way through a
> poster-size print with no prior notification, has left a bad taste in my
> mouth about hp printers.
My 750C had problems running out of memory quite often (esp. on 36" wide
stuff). Haven't had any problems with the 1055 so far. And I'm using the
post script drivers
>
> 6. We are in Nevada, where the humidity is so low that our 755cm
cartridges
> frequently dry and clog - I've taken to keeping them in a humidified
> tupperware container between print jobs. Any similar experience with the
> 1055 cartridges or 9600 cartridges would be useful to hear about!
>
The 1055 uses separate replaceable printheads. According to the literature,
you should only have to replace the print heads until after 3-4 cartridges.
And these are BIG cartridges (Physical size about 3"x5".
> 7. The epson claims to alow cartridge replacement mid-print, the hp does
> not appear to make this claim. (One headache with our 755 has been
> cartridges running out mid-print)
Cartridges can be switched mid-print. I haven't had the oppurtunity to try
this yet, but I did remove and re-install a cartridge in mid print and it
didn't even hiccup!
>
> 8. The epson uses 7 colors (vs the hp 4) and has a higher resolution -
does
> this really translate to much difference in print sharpness or ink use
> efficiency?
From what I looked at, the Epson had better image quality. The printers I
have used with 6-7 colors does not translate into more efficient ink use
>
> 9. The hp adds a hard disk, does this really make much difference for
print
> jobs?
For really big jobs, for repeat jobs and for multiple copies
>
> 10. With the epson, we would probably just take the 1 year warrantee,
with
> the hp we would probably go with a 3 year warrantee... any warrantee
> experience with these printers would be good to know about.
It all depends on the VAR (provided that you are buying thru a VAR, If you
are not, I would recommend finding one. VARS have a lot more pull to get to
technical resources. And I actually got a better price through a VAR than
buying direct from HP.
>
> Thanks!
> -Eric
>
>
I hope all of this helps
Mark