Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (
More info?)
I know there are some like that but I like to keep my opinions mainly to
myself, although you must admit there are many who like to bash Microsoft
just because they are who they are.
As for the superiority of NTFS over FAT32 I don't know just that I thought
it gave a better cluster size so not wasting as much space, sorry but I'm
not into the inner workings of the OS, like tonight when I came back on
here and couldn't go anywhere, even though I was supposed to be connected
tried a reboot of the router didn't work, couldn't even shutdown no
problem just did a cold reboot and everything working OK again <vbg> after
all they are only machines and things go wrong especially when you've got
me in front of them <vbg>
Joan
Shane wrote:
> What I don't like Joan, is the no. who won't hear a word said against
> Microsoft, like what's good for MS is good for the world, who repeat
> parrot-fashion and ad-nauseum that NTFS is superior to FAT32, and
> jump down the throat of anyone who has activation problems, assuming
> them to be pirates. Half of 'em are MVPs! You've also got a certain
> Microsoft employee who practices pro-microsoft censorship (and tells
> lies such as the XP cd contains all the necessary tools for repairing
> XP).
>
>
> Shane