Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Cheers, Tom.
Still get the repeated "3 additional protections possible", but the overall
total is down 2. When this happened last year it took them months to correct
it.........so I find it very depressing that it's started again.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
A question about the update process.
I've got SS&D set to look for updates every time it starts. It does the "search
for updates" thing on every start, but then (whether it finds updates or not)
goes directly to the main menu, with the "Check for Problems," "Recovery" and
"Search for Updates" buttons. What I'd really like it to do is, if there are
updates, go to the download screen. Even always starting at the download
screen, even if there were no updates, would be good.
Have I missed a setting somewhere which would do this?
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Hi, Shane,
This update didn't fix the immunize issue on WinME. I took a look at
the Spybot forum and didn't see any information offered on a fix. I'm
curious to hear what Dapper Dan has to say from the earlier thread about
a change in the settings that might correct this.
Tom
Shane wrote:
> Cheers, Tom.
>
> Still get the repeated "3 additional protections possible", but the overall
> total is down 2. When this happened last year it took them months to correct
> it.........so I find it very depressing that it's started again.
>
>
> Shane
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Bill,
I don't believe so. It seems to be the way it functions at present.
Tom
Bill Leary wrote:
> A question about the update process.
>
> I've got SS&D set to look for updates every time it starts. It does the "search
> for updates" thing on every start, but then (whether it finds updates or not)
> goes directly to the main menu, with the "Check for Problems," "Recovery" and
> "Search for Updates" buttons. What I'd really like it to do is, if there are
> updates, go to the download screen. Even always starting at the download
> screen, even if there were no updates, would be good.
>
> Have I missed a setting somewhere which would do this?
>
> - Bill
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Seems to be an issue with Me.........the update works fine on the XP box.
What I have noticed is that the download speeds are really, painfully, slow.
I have tried EON Australia and See-Cure Europe, so far.........the Aussie
site used to zip right through. I guess there are a lot of folks dl'ding.
Heirloom, old and watched 2 hours of the
Eagles tonight........cool.
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:uio1kt9ZFHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Shane,
>
> This update didn't fix the immunize issue on WinME. I took a look at
> the Spybot forum and didn't see any information offered on a fix. I'm
> curious to hear what Dapper Dan has to say from the earlier thread about a
> change in the settings that might correct this.
>
> Tom
>
> Shane wrote:
>> Cheers, Tom.
>>
>> Still get the repeated "3 additional protections possible", but the
>> overall
>> total is down 2. When this happened last year it took them months to
>> correct
>> it.........so I find it very depressing that it's started again.
>>
>>
>> Shane
>>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news54njZ%23ZFHA.3364@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I don't believe so. It seems to be the way it functions at present.
Thanks. I'm pleased that I didn't just miss some obvious switch.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
It was a false alarm Tom. The supposed fix did not work. See my
response to Shane in the previous thread.
Dan
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:uio1kt9ZFHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Shane,
>
> This update didn't fix the immunize issue on WinME. I took a look
at
> the Spybot forum and didn't see any information offered on a fix.
I'm
> curious to hear what Dapper Dan has to say from the earlier thread
about
> a change in the settings that might correct this.
>
> Tom
>
> Shane wrote:
> > Cheers, Tom.
> >
> > Still get the repeated "3 additional protections possible", but
the overall
> > total is down 2. When this happened last year it took them months
to correct
> > it.........so I find it very depressing that it's started again.
> >
> >
> > Shane
> >
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Hi, Dan,
I saw your response about unchecking the items in the ignore list. I
had done that right after installing Spybot 1.4, and it didn't affect
what was occurring with the 3 immunization items. I'm sure it'll get
sorted out eventually.
Thanks,
Tom
Dapper Dan wrote:
> It was a false alarm Tom. The supposed fix did not work. See my
> response to Shane in the previous thread.
>
> Dan
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
What hadn't occurred to me (as one who routinely upgrades a previous
installation rather than uninstall it), and that Dan's post prompted me to
check, is the wisdom of checking one's Ignore Product settings after
updates, as "Deselect All" is not retained as a user preference!
That was probably naive of me to assume otherwise.
Shane
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:%23Bx$mwFaFHA.3488@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Dan,
>
> I saw your response about unchecking the items in the ignore list. I had
> done that right after installing Spybot 1.4, and it didn't affect what was
> occurring with the 3 immunization items. I'm sure it'll get sorted out
> eventually.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> Dapper Dan wrote:
>> It was a false alarm Tom. The supposed fix did not work. See my
>> response to Shane in the previous thread.
>>
>> Dan
>>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.