Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > General Discussion > Why would anyone buy a Baron?

Why would anyone buy a Baron?

Forum Video Games : General Discussion Why would anyone buy a Baron?

Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

....As Peter brought to our attention with the Eclipse 500
http://www.eclipseaviation.com/500jet/overview.htm

The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000

A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210

(When you're talking a million, a $20 grand difference is not going break
the bank.)


The Baron: six seats, non pressurized, useful load 1,514 lbs, range 1,027
nm, 198 kt cruise speed, analogue instruments.

Eclipse 500: six seats, pressurized, useful load 2,250 lb, operates at
41,000 ft, range 1,280 nm, 375 kt cruise speed, Avio Avionics glass cockpit.

Panel:
http://www.eclipseaviation.com/ima [...] el_med.jpg


I don't see any contest here it does everything much better. So why would
anyone go to the factory and buy a new Baron?

Dallas

Reply to dallas
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Dallas" <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote in message
news:%%AQd.1470$kU3.1469@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> ...As Peter brought to our attention with the Eclipse 500
> http://www.eclipseaviation.com/500jet/overview.htm
>
> The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000
>
> A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210
>
> (When you're talking a million, a $20 grand difference is not going break
> the bank.)
>
>
> The Baron: six seats, non pressurized, useful load 1,514 lbs, range 1,027
> nm, 198 kt cruise speed, analogue instruments.
>
> Eclipse 500: six seats, pressurized, useful load 2,250 lb, operates at
> 41,000 ft, range 1,280 nm, 375 kt cruise speed, Avio Avionics glass
cockpit.
>
> Panel:
> http://www.eclipseaviation.com/ima [...] el_med.jpg
>
>
> I don't see any contest here it does everything much better. So why would
> anyone go to the factory and buy a new Baron?
>
> Dallas

Good point. I know a guy who owns an Eclipse (and a Falcon 900) - I'll see
if I can track him down and ask him the same question! What are the
relative maintenance cost dynamics like? (They will be "dynamic" for
sure!!)

Cheers,
Dave (Sydney)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Operating costs?

--
....Carl Frisk
Anger is a brief madness.
- Horace, 20 B.C.
http://www.carlfrisk.com


"Dallas" <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote in message news:%%AQd.1470$kU3.1469@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> ...As Peter brought to our attention with the Eclipse 500
> http://www.eclipseaviation.com/500jet/overview.htm
>
> The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000
>
> A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210
>
> (When you're talking a million, a $20 grand difference is not going break
> the bank.)
>
>
> The Baron: six seats, non pressurized, useful load 1,514 lbs, range 1,027
> nm, 198 kt cruise speed, analogue instruments.
>
> Eclipse 500: six seats, pressurized, useful load 2,250 lb, operates at
> 41,000 ft, range 1,280 nm, 375 kt cruise speed, Avio Avionics glass cockpit.
>
> Panel:
> http://www.eclipseaviation.com/ima [...] el_med.jpg
>
>
> I don't see any contest here it does everything much better. So why would
> anyone go to the factory and buy a new Baron?
>
> Dallas
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Dave E <i.am@my.wits.end.with.spam> wrote:

> Good point. I know a guy who owns an Eclipse

I cannot imagine that he is flying it yet. The aircraft is still in the
certification stages and the first one is still a year to a year and a half
from being delivered to its first customer.

--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Carl Frisk <c.frisk@REMOVE.verizon.net> wrote:

> Operating costs?

Supposedly will be cheaper with the Eclipse.

However, the cost of insurance, training, and recurring training might tip
the scales in the Baron's favors in the short term (until some safety
statistics start to emerge).

--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Dallas <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote:

> The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000
>
> A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210

The person about whom I was posting currently owns a beautiful 1999 Baron
and that is exactly his thinking.

Of course, it helps that he is the heir of the family who ran a very
successful, large electronics repair empire.

--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

barons are nice but too expensive,i would love to fly the eclipse 500
it's a jet at a lower cost,faster longer range and has a toilet.all
glass
cockpit way nice avionics,

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://forums.simradar.com
Visit www.simradar.com and try our Flight Simulation Search Engine!

Reply to destroyer
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Carl Frisk"
> Operating costs?

The Baron holds 194 US gals and has a range of 1,027 nm.

The Eclipse 500 holds 230 US gals and has a range of 1,280 nm.

If want to figure "mileage":

Baron: 5.3 nm/gal
Eclipse: 5.6 nm/gal

Eclipse wins.

(I don't know how much an engine overhaul costs..)

Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Dallas <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote:

> Eclipse wins.
>
> (I don't know how much an engine overhaul costs..)

Time between overhauls for these engines is much longer, in the order of
two to three times as long as a piston engine.


--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Dallas" <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote in
news:%%AQd.1470$kU3.1469@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

> ...As Peter brought to our attention with the Eclipse 500
> http://www.eclipseaviation.com/500jet/overview.htm
>
> The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000
>
> A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210
>
> (When you're talking a million, a $20 grand difference is not going
> break the bank.)
>
>
> The Baron: six seats, non pressurized, useful load 1,514 lbs, range
> 1,027 nm, 198 kt cruise speed, analogue instruments.
>
> Eclipse 500: six seats, pressurized, useful load 2,250 lb, operates at
> 41,000 ft, range 1,280 nm, 375 kt cruise speed, Avio Avionics glass
> cockpit.
>
> Panel:
> http://www.eclipseaviation.com/ima [...] anel_med.j
> pg
>
>
> I don't see any contest here it does everything much better. So why
> would anyone go to the factory and buy a new Baron?
>
> Dallas
>
>

Ratings.
I can get a twin engine ticket (after my IFR, of course) at a reasonable
cost. Then I have to build time so the insurance companies will start
answering my calls. Without a respectable amount of turbine time, I just
can't get insurance, even with a Ford Excursion full of cash.

--
e v e n S k y

Athlon 266Ghz
1 G Ram
GeForce FX5900XT
160G H-D
80G H-D
W2K, FS9
Wingman Strike force 3D

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"evenSky" <
> Ratings.

Yeah, I was thinking that.... but I was thinking just about the cost of
getting the rating not the insurance company. That's a good insight.

Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"pr" <nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:1bchccxshzyyg$.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...
> Dave E <i.am@my.wits.end.with.spam> wrote:
>
> > Good point. I know a guy who owns an Eclipse
>
> I cannot imagine that he is flying it yet. The aircraft is still in the
> certification stages and the first one is still a year to a year and a
half
> from being delivered to its first customer.

Yes, you are right - Peter has committed to a purchase and intends to use it
for those trips when the Falcon isn't viable. I wasn't aware that it was so
far off. It's been some months since we spoke. He has a fairly tough life
from what I can glean. As for me, I'm still chuffed that I can solo
circuits in the (rented) 152.

:-)

Cheers,
Dave (Sydney)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Why? "Getting insurance on a jet".


Dave BLevins


On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:39:07 GMT, "Dallas"
>
>I don't see any contest here it does everything much better. So why would
>anyone go to the factory and buy a new Baron?
>
>Dallas
>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

> Why? "Getting insurance on a jet".

For those of us totally out of the loop, what would the cost difference be
on this between a fully qualified/certified pilot and owner of a Baron vs.
the Eclipse? Inquiring minds want to know :)

Doug

Reply to user

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:39:07 +0000, Dallas wrote:



Here are a couple of reasons.

Average hourly cost for the Baron = $297
Average cost for a year for the Baron = $44560

Average hourly cost for the Eclipse = $1750
Average cost for a year for the Eclipse = $172000

None of the above costs have anything to do with the purchase
price for the aircraft.

Source is a Honeywell Aerospace study.


Part of the problem as I understand it, is that the FAA considers the
Baron to be a private aircraft but the Eclipse to fall under the rules of
a commercial Jet Aviation company.


Hagar

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Hagar" \
> Source is a Honeywell Aerospace study.

Is that study available on-line? I'm not challenging your creditability...
I'd like to have a reference like that.


Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:07:14 +0000, Dallas wrote:

>
> "Hagar" \
>> Source is a Honeywell Aerospace study.
>
> Is that study available on-line? I'm not challenging your
> creditability... I'd like to have a reference like that.
>
>
> Dallas

I just did a google search. It came from two places so it was not really
a side by side comparison. I noticed several like studies out there for
all kinds of planes so they seem to be plentiful.

The one that surprised me was for the Lear. Man, that little jet is
EXPENSIVE to fly by the hour.

Hagar

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Hagar"
> I noticed several like studies out there for
> all kinds of planes so they seem to be plentiful.

That's nice to know because I'm finding the last place you want to get your
comparison information is from the manufacturer's marketing departments.

Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Hagar <horrible@nowhere.com> wrote:

> Part of the problem as I understand it, is that the FAA considers the
> Baron to be a private aircraft but the Eclipse to fall under the rules of
> a commercial Jet Aviation company.

Not true. The Eclipse Aviation jet, if it ever becomes certified, will be
allowed to be flown under FAR (US Aviation regulations) Part 91, which is
the same set of less stringent rules that regulate Piper Cubs, C172s, and
other piston and turbine aircraft that are not flown for commercial or
military reasons in US airspace.

What you probably encountered in your Google search was the discussion that
this new line of "private" jets will be *also* very attractive for air taxi
companies. There is speculation that companies that utilize these jets
will be able to provide price-similar competition to the large air
carriers.

When flying specifically as an air taxi service, these jets *will* then be
subjected to the much more costly and rigorous FAR Part 135, which are a
separate set of rules requiring more routine aircraft inspections and pilot
examination.

--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Dave E <i.am@my.wits.end.with.spam> wrote:

> He has a fairly tough life from what I can glean.

LOL! I'd say. Stay in contact with him so that you can ride along in the
co-pilot seat of the Eclipse when he receives it. That's what I am trying
to do with the gentleman I met last fall. :)

> As for me, I'm still chuffed that I can solo circuits in the
> (rented) 152.

Congratulations! That is an accomplishment.


--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

a toilet.all glass


hmmm sounds a bit like a Hugh Heffner plane to me:-)

--
Quilljar
see http://client.webshots.com/album/194691959rhDQFi
Do not reply personally, all such emails go into my spam filter

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

A toilet? A toilet? WOW......that's the plane for me! Who cares about
fuel economy and overhaul costs if you have a toilet! Would probably be the
only one the wife would let me buy anyway.

Arthur

"DESTROYER" <DESTROYER@forums.simradar.com> wrote in message
news:1108583756.25785@forums.simradar.com...
> barons are nice but too expensive,i would love to fly the eclipse 500
> it's a jet at a lower cost,faster longer range and has a toilet.all
> glass
> cockpit way nice avionics,
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://forums.simradar.com
> Visit www.simradar.com and try our Flight Simulation Search Engine!

Reply to Arthur
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Arthur"
> A toilet? A toilet? WOW......that's the plane for me! Would probably be
the
> only one the wife would let me buy anyway.

What good would it do ya? You could never get her outta there... :-)

Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Dallas" wrote :
: The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000
:
: A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210
:
: (When you're talking a million, a $20 grand difference is not going break
: the bank.)
:
A fellow for whom I fix planes has a Baron and a King Air at my field.
Just the other day he and his wife zigged in for a quick flight to a half
dozen different fields in one afternoon (didn't ask why). Said he was
taking the Baron because it takes less time to preflight.

His jets are at the regional field down the road. I'll have to ask him about
the cost differential.

Dave

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

I don't know the specific numbers, but I can assure you that the
insurance companies are going to be *very* nervous about insuring these
light jets - at least one reason why is that things happen so much
faster in an aircraft that goes that fast, and they're gonna want to see
a bunch of relevant time and/or (emphasis being on "and" ) training in
"type".

That kind of speed makes for a very busy pilot - and since these
aircraft will almost always be flown on IFR flight plans (because jet
engines burn less Jet-A at high altitudes, and anything above 18,000
feet is by definition IFR airspace), the pilot's workload will be quite
high during the climb, descent, and approach phases of flight. (As
opposed to punching holes in the sky with a <250hp airplane 8^).)

In addition to the outright speed of the Eclipse (and other most light
jets), there is the challenge of learning to manage a jet engine
properly. They are much different beasts than piston-powered airplanes
-all jet pilots ( even turboprop'd ones) have to get used to a new
methodology of energy management, because jet engines do not react to
the pilot's power changes as a piston engine will - there is a lag time
involved, whereas in piston aircraft the response is more immediate for
a similar size of the airframe and number of engines. This is one of the
reasons why the US Air Force lost so many pilots transitioning from
pistons to jets in the 50's - it is a whole 'nuther kind of flying.

There are probably other reasons why the insurance companies want more
time. Give me a minute and they'll come to me 8^) .

Dave Blevins


On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:15:54 GMT, " -" <xvvvz@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Why? "Getting insurance on a jet".
>
>For those of us totally out of the loop, what would the cost difference be
>on this between a fully qualified/certified pilot and owner of a Baron vs.
>the Eclipse? Inquiring minds want to know :)
>
>Doug
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:42:17 GMT, David Ward wrote:

> Just the other day he and his wife zigged in for a quick flight to a half
> dozen different fields in one afternoon (didn't ask why).

Distributing drugs? ;)

Bill

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Bill Leaming"
> Distributing drugs? ;)

Hey, that's a profession that will really get your hours up.


Dallas

Reply to dallas
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:39:07 GMT, "Dallas"
<Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote:

>...As Peter brought to our attention with the Eclipse 500
>http://www.eclipseaviation.com/500jet/overview.htm
>
>The jet twin Eclipse 500 costs $1,175,000
>
>A new Baron 58 costs $1,154,210

That is a very well equipped Baron.
>
>(When you're talking a million, a $20 grand difference is not going break
>the bank.)

You are also talking about pilot qualifications and insurability.
I was talking about a TBM 700 and was quoted $25,000 a year, which is
actually cheaper per hull value than I pay now. Of course with no
turbine time they wanted *200* hours dual. Now that could have been
with a qualified copilot/instructor.

You can move into a light twin like the Baron far, far easier than
into a light jet. Also the industry hasn't figured out just quite what
to do with the light jets, but they are talking a minimum of 1500
hours.

>
>
>The Baron: six seats, non pressurized, useful load 1,514 lbs, range 1,027
>nm, 198 kt cruise speed, analogue instruments.

And you can start flying one as soon as you get the rating.
OTOH insurance will still be hard to get with under 600 to 700 hours
and probably 200 twin time.

With a high performance single, Call it a Bo, or cheap Bo, they still
specify 600 total time minimum, 25 in make and model, and there was
one other limitation in there for un-named pilots.

>
>Eclipse 500: six seats, pressurized, useful load 2,250 lb, operates at
>41,000 ft, range 1,280 nm, 375 kt cruise speed, Avio Avionics glass cockpit.
>
>Panel:
>http://www.eclipseaviation.com/images/jet_photos/Instrument_Panel_med.jpg
>
>
>I don't see any contest here it does everything much better. So why would
>anyone go to the factory and buy a new Baron?

See above.
Plus I'd bet insurance is going to be plain hard to get except for
professional pilots. By that I don't mean you need the commercial or
ATP, you need to be flying on some one's pay roll. That is showing up
even in the high performance singles and twins.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


>
>Dallas
>

Reply to Roger
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:21:41 -0500, Bill Leaming <n4gix@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:42:17 GMT, David Ward wrote:
>
>> Just the other day he and his wife zigged in for a quick flight to a half
>> dozen different fields in one afternoon (didn't ask why).
>
>Distributing drugs? ;)

Staying ahead of the bill collectors?

Roger

>
>Bill

Roger

Reply to Roger
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Roger"
> Also the industry hasn't figured out just quite what
> to do with the light jets, but they are talking a minimum of 1500
> hours.

Wow, that would make it just about impossible for Joe Schmo to own one of
these jets.

Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Bill Leaming" <n4gix@comcast.net> wrote in message news:17b5thqf9wf6f.1gsgi7mhxtd97.dlg@40tude.net...
: On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:42:17 GMT, David Ward wrote:
:
: > Just the other day he and his wife zigged in for a quick flight to a half
: > dozen different fields in one afternoon (didn't ask why).
:
: Distributing drugs? ;)
:
: Bill

Ya know, I may just have to ask. The fellers loaded - and I've no idea
from where the cash flows.

Dave

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:30:54 GMT, David Ward wrote:

> "Bill Leaming" <n4gix@comcast.net> wrote in message news:17b5thqf9wf6f.1gsgi7mhxtd97.dlg@40tude.net...
>: On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:42:17 GMT, David Ward wrote:

>: Distributing drugs? ;)
> Ya know, I may just have to ask. The fellers loaded - and I've no idea
> from where the cash flows.

Be careful, especially if his last name ends with a vowel... ;)

Bill

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:38:07 -0500, Bill Leaming <n4gix@comcast.net>
wrote:

>>: Distributing drugs? ;)
>> Ya know, I may just have to ask. The fellers loaded - and I've no idea
>> from where the cash flows.
>
>Be careful, especially if his last name ends with a vowel... ;)
>

Hi Bill

That bloke John Doe is not to be trusted. No sir! As far as I
understand the situation, he's wanted for all sorts of heinous crimes.

I also understand that his wife, Jane, is a nasty piece of work.

James

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:42:10 GMT, James Hodson wrote:
>>>: Distributing drugs? ;)
>>> Ya know, I may just have to ask. The fellers loaded - and I've no idea
>>> from where the cash flows.
>>
>>Be careful, especially if his last name ends with a vowel... ;)
> That bloke John Doe is not to be trusted. No sir! As far as I
> understand the situation, he's wanted for all sorts of heinous crimes.

Ha! Boy, your mention of "Doe" certainly spoiled that simile... I was
intending for folks to inference the nefarious members another gang
entirely... ;)

Bill

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Hi James Hodson,

LOL!

Ya can't get away with anything on this n/g! :-)

John
"James Hodson" <jUNDERSCOREhodson@ntlworld.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:sd3k11tiiagurn520403k6taemoapktlps@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:38:07 -0500, Bill Leaming <n4gix@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >>: Distributing drugs? ;)
> >> Ya know, I may just have to ask. The fellers loaded - and I've no idea
> >> from where the cash flows.
> >
> >Be careful, especially if his last name ends with a vowel... ;)
> >
>
> Hi Bill
>
> That bloke John Doe is not to be trusted. No sir! As far as I
> understand the situation, he's wanted for all sorts of heinous crimes.
>
> I also understand that his wife, Jane, is a nasty piece of work.
>
> James

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:32:00 +1000, "John Ward"
<johnrmward@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>Hi James Hodson,
>
> LOL!
>
> Ya can't get away with anything on this n/g! :-)

Hiyya John

I apologise for stealing your thunder :-)

James

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:19:13 -0500, Bill Leaming <n4gix@comcast.net>
wrote:

>Ha! Boy, your mention of "Doe" certainly spoiled that simile... I was
>intending for folks to inference the nefarious members another gang
>entirely... ;)

Stuff happens.

James

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Roger"
> BUT is better than a $3500 micro switch.

I'm pretty sure I read that 1 Beech King Air tire costs $3,000... does that
sound right?

Dallas

Reply to dallas
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Roger"
> What do you suppose it'd cost to replace the skin only forward of the
> firewall on a 1959 Debonair, or for that matter how about the nose
> gear strut.

Why didn't I think of that 15 years ago... if you manufactured replacement
parts for out of production aircraft you could be drinking champagne on your
Yacht off the coast of Phi Phi right now.

Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Dallas <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.Hotmail.Com> wrote:

> "Roger"
>> BUT is better than a $3500 micro switch.
>
> I'm pretty sure I read that 1 Beech King Air tire costs $3,000... does that
> sound right?

Maybe in yen they do, but in USD, more like $108 to $225. (depending on
manufacturer):

http://www.airsuppliers.com/Beech_ [...] _tires.htm

--
Peter













----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:28:15 -0500, Roger wrote:

>>As it turned out a complete actuator on seperator was replaced.
>>Cost: $4136.48 for part + 1.5 hour for labor or $112.5, Total :
>>$4248.98

> Total cost with labor and nearly two months down time. $5,000.
> BUT is better than a $3500 micro switch.
> OTOH factor in the liability, set up charges, certification....

Also the fact that they are also micro-manufacturing, so there's no
"economy of scale" factor that may be applied. Therefore the cost of the
engineering, certification, etc. must be amortized across a much smaller
marketplace.

Still though, Randy's point was that initially he was told the connecting
wire's insulation was chafed. They couldn't simply replace the wire?

Oh no, they replaced the entire acctuator assembly because now they said
the "wire was broken." His question still remains unanswered. If the wire
was truly "broken," why the accuator still working? Hmmm...

I suppose it's possible that the wire is moulded into the accuator housing
making it impossible to simply replace the wire. It's sort of like your
local garage telling you that they have to replace the starter because your
battery cable is chafed though...

Bill

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Bill Leaming wrote:
> of like your local garage telling you that they have to replace the
> starter because your battery cable is chafed though...
>

Except the local garage would also replace the alternator, battery, add some
$5 anti-corrosive felt thingies to the battery terminals, and recommend you
replace your shocks because a tire is wearing uneven, etc.....

Reminds me of the old TV repair scums that would sell you 8 tubes (valves :)
for your 12 tube set, because the filiment burnt out in 1...

Reply to crash
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"CRaSH"
> Reminds me of the old TV repair scums that would sell you 8 tubes (valves
:)
> for your 12 tube set, because the filiment burnt out in 1...

Jeez... you are an old codger!!!


:-)

Dallas

Reply to dallas
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Bill Leaming"
> Oh no, they replaced the entire actuator assembly because now they said
> the "wire was broken."

So I guess they never heard of a soldering iron and heat-shrink tubing?


Dallas

Reply to dallas

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Also Sprach Dallas <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.hotmail.com>:
> "Bill Leaming"
>> Oh no, they replaced the entire actuator assembly because now they said
>> the "wire was broken."

> So I guess they never heard of a soldering iron and heat-shrink tubing?

You should never create in-line soldered connections in aircraft wiring
harnesses. They tend to crack due to vibration. A properly supported
crimp would have been fine, though.

Dan

--
Love is like a bottle of gin, but a bottle of gin is NOT like love.

-- The Magnetic Fields

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

And with certain types of wiring used on various sensors, splicing the wire
can result in improper gauge readings due to the change in
resistance/capacitance/impedance.


"Marshall Banana" <dan@angband.org> wrote in message
news:38p4duF5qjfjpU1@individual.net...
> Also Sprach Dallas <Cybnorm@spam_me_not.hotmail.com>:
> > "Bill Leaming"
> >> Oh no, they replaced the entire actuator assembly because now they said
> >> the "wire was broken."
>
> > So I guess they never heard of a soldering iron and heat-shrink tubing?
>
> You should never create in-line soldered connections in aircraft wiring
> harnesses. They tend to crack due to vibration. A properly supported
> crimp would have been fine, though.
>
> Dan
>
> --
> Love is like a bottle of gin, but a bottle of gin is NOT like love.
>
> -- The Magnetic Fields

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Also Sprach Bill Leaming <n4gix@comcast.net>:

>> Total cost with labor and nearly two months down time. $5,000.
>> BUT is better than a $3500 micro switch.
>> OTOH factor in the liability, set up charges, certification....

> Also the fact that they are also micro-manufacturing, so there's no
> "economy of scale" factor that may be applied. Therefore the cost of the
> engineering, certification, etc. must be amortized across a much smaller
> marketplace.

Funny story about spendy airplane parts. I was helping out with some
maintainance on a Cessna 310. This particular model year has a fuel
circulator pump that does nothing but transfer fuel from the front of the
tank to the rear, to ensure that the fuel pickup does not become uncovered
during a steep decent. (This was actually not original equipment, but
added to comply with an Airworthiness Directive) The pump had failed, and
needed to be replaced. Cessna wanted $550 for the pump. Looking at it,
it was pretty obvious that it was nothing but a regular old automotive
Facet brand interuptor pump, that you could get at any parts store for $40
or so, except that it was 28 volts. The owner ended up ordering a pump
from Aircraft Spruce, for somewhere around $60. When it arrived, it had a
big old label on it saying "FOR AUTOMOTIVE USE ONLY. THE MANUFACTURER DOES
NOT RECOMMEND USAGE IN AIRCRAFT APPLICATIONS." Obviously, the owner
decided to pony up the $$$ to buy the Cessna pump. When that pump
arrived, we noticed that it seemed to be identical to the automotive
part. The Cessna part label was not quite fully adhered at the corner, so
we carefully peeled the label back and found it was covering the
original label, stating "THE MANUFACTURER DOES NOT RECOMMEND USAGE IN
AIRCRAFT APPLICATIONS."

http://www.angband.org/~dan/P1010027.JPG
http://www.angband.org/~dan/P10100261.JPG

--
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.

-- Douglas Adams

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

"Lakeview Bill"
> > You should never create in-line soldered connections in aircraft wiring
> > harnesses. They tend to crack due to vibration. A properly supported
> > crimp would have been fine, though.

Ok... twist it into a pigtail, solder it.. then twist a wire nut over it.
:-)

I would have done the job for $25 bucks - and $300 travel expenses. :-)

Dallas

Reply to dallas
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

Dallas wrote:

> "CRaSH"
>
>>Reminds me of the old TV repair scums that would sell you 8 tubes (valves
>
> :)
>
>>for your 12 tube set, because the filiment burnt out in 1...
>
>
> Jeez... you are an old codger!!!
>
>
> :-)
>
> Dallas
>
>


Dalli, I thought I was a yungun here but I remember my mom giving me a
burned out tube to take to the repair shop, getting a new one, bringing
it home and plugging it in. I don't know, maybe it was that West
Virginia was behind the times. :)


--

boB

U.S. Army Aviation (retired)
Central Texas - 5NM West of Gray Army Airfield (KGRK)

Reply to Bob
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (More info?)

 

boB wrote:


>
> Dalli, I thought I was a yungun here but I remember my mom giving me a
> burned out tube to take to the repair shop, getting a new one, bringing
> it home and plugging it in. I don't know, maybe it was that West
> Virginia was behind the times. :)
>

How in the hell did I remember that....... I wish my short term memory
was that good. :(



--

boB

U.S. Army Aviation (retired)
Central Texas - 5NM West of Gray Army Airfield (KGRK)

Reply to Bob
Register or log in to remove.
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > General Discussion > Why would anyone buy a Baron?
Go to:

There are 2033 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Diablo 3
By DM186, 9 hours ago:

That kinda sound normal. When I play Shogun 2 total war. When I am on the campain map I...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts