Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Tom:
Patience is a virtue, I suppose, especially in this case.
The strange thing is, before I upgraded it worked allright.
Maybe I should have kept the previous version.
Is there a way to go back?
Harry.
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:u5upKNPeFHA.4016@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Harry,
>
> You're welcome. All I know is that a fix is in the works.
>
> Tom
>
> webster72n wrote:
> > Thank you, Tom.
> > Any idea when it will be corrected, if ever?
> >
> > Harry.
> >
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Harry,
This was an issue at one time in the previous version that was
ultimately resolved. I would recommend staying with the current
version. As you indicate, patience is a virtue.
Tom
webster72n wrote:
> Tom:
>
> Patience is a virtue, I suppose, especially in this case.
> The strange thing is, before I upgraded it worked allright.
> Maybe I should have kept the previous version.
> Is there a way to go back?
>
> Harry.
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsme.general (More info?)
Will do, Tom.
Thank you.
Harry.
"TomV" <t@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:uZKehPReFHA.544@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Harry,
>
> This was an issue at one time in the previous version that was
> ultimately resolved. I would recommend staying with the current
> version. As you indicate, patience is a virtue.
>
> Tom
>
> webster72n wrote:
> > Tom:
> >
> > Patience is a virtue, I suppose, especially in this case.
> > The strange thing is, before I upgraded it worked allright.
> > Maybe I should have kept the previous version.
> > Is there a way to go back?
> >
> > Harry.
> >
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.