Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain (
More info?)
They have a good trust relationship. The servers communicate fine on
the same side of the network. It's only when I bring it across the VPN
that the problem shows. Only for domain communication. All other
communications are fine.
> Did you check to see on both domains if you had a trustrelationship
> setup between them. Go to active directory domains and trust, and
> setup a trustrelationship between the two domains.
>
> "Lewis" wrote:
>
>> Here is the setup:
>>
>> Parent Domain Server (win 2000) in corporate office (10.0.1.X
>> network) Setting up new Child Domain server (win 2003) in remote
>> office (172.16.2.X network)
>> Remote office connected to corporate office through VPN (IPSec 3DES)
>> (Linksys VPN router to Cisco VPN concentrator)
>>
>>
>> From the remote network server, I can ping the corporate side
>> machines and DNS resolution is working for all servers throughout the
>> network.
>>
>> However, domain communications between the child and parent are not
>> functioning. The application log errors are "cannot bind to
>> ourcompany.org domain" and "Windows cannot query for the list of
>> group objects".
>>
>> I tested shares, and it seems that the child server can browse and
>> see the shares, but when I try to open a share I get "the share is
>> not accessible" and "the specified network name is no longer
>> available".
>>
>> Just to test, we put the child server on the same network as the
>> parent, and all worked perfectly, so at least we know the setup is
>> ok. It just doesn't communicate properly across the VPN.
>>
>> I know there is an issue of Netbios across VPN's, but I made sure to
>> setup Netbios over TCP/IP which should take care of that.
>>
>> Sniffer traces show traffic coming from and to each server on both
>> sides of the network, so communication itself is not an issue.
>>
>> I am missing something else, and I do not know where else to look.
>> Why would everything else work except inter-domain trust
>> communications?
>>
>> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>