tks~
performance
sempron is slightly higher than celeron (non-oc)
oc-performance
sempron could outperform p4-630/amd64 3K+/sempron3400+
when they are oc to 2.xG (300Mhz+ FSB) in overall performance
platform
945p is an ideal choice for Intel, while, a Oced Sempron is better than a normalP4-630, it seems that there is no need buy a Celeron then upgrade a P4-6series cpu later, only 8series is acceptable.but a value platform has only a small chance to upgrade a mid/high-end dual core 8series CPU,right?
intel chipset has the superior compatibility and runs stable...it's appealing.
PT880Pro have a AGP8x plus PCiE4x and Duo DDR1/2 at the same time, that's wonderful, but the stability is doubtful.
we have nF4-x and C51 ,KT890 for the S754 CPUs, but nil powerful successor(e6 amd64)....ya, agree that S754 is going to "dead" and s939 sempron might came out in Q1-2006. if there was a low end Sempron939 now, we could easily catch the answer ~
also single channel DDR1 with S754 is a spot
all in all, there is a little bit confused when making the decision....
well, for the integrated 6200TC in C51, do you think it could totally defeat a dated MX440 or Ti4200?